Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Chara's DETERMINATION and murderous intent pushed them to the extreme peak of a human soul. The souls Flowey absorbed weren't genocidal in the same way, and were sort of working against him anyways. Besides, as mentioned before Chara has a much better feat, by completely destroying "the game" in such a way that only they can reset it, minus literally a clean reinstall of the game or messing with the files.Isn’t omega flowey stronger than chara since he has 6 souls while chara has 1
Yes, and Omega Flowey describes himself as a God while and after flaunting his control over the gameworld to Frisk, and states the whole world is also his own, so, again, that does indicate he held enough dominion over it to qualify as Low 2-C. Base Flowey describing his DETERMINATION powers in similar terms doesn't matter when the context of the two statements is much different: Flowey before absorbing the six SOULs mostly controlled the gameworld by resetting it and then taking a different course of action than the one he took in the previous iteration of the Underground, and that's what "reshaping the world" and "playing God" were in reference to, things that obviously weren't as direct as what Omega Flowey does.No offense but this is biased, being a god accounts for nothing, being a god of something doesn't mean the god can one-shot the thing it's god over, it can maybe and not even necessarily mean the god has powers related to it. O. Flowey has that, base Flowey already had that and O. Flowey has that but better, that is the unbiased way to take him being a god.
Sure, but the existence of multiple interpretations doesn't really make all of them equally valid, especially when you put some of them under any amount of scrutiny. So, I don't know what your point is there.He implies so in a slightly less clear manner than him being unable to kill everyone given the wording; If you want to disagree that this is what he implied on regards to the Monsters then ok, but you should at least be able to see it as a reasonable interpretation.
He really doesn't, at least not as directly as you're making it out to be. All he states is that he needs Frisk's SOUL to complete himself and then talks about how he will show "the real meaning of this world" to Humans and Monsters. Given Asriel's dialogue later on in the Pacifist Route, that tidbit was likely referring to how he was planning to destroy the world, since that was his main goal before Asriel's original personality took over.On top of not having done it yet he says that he can't yet because he needs more power, if he'll use that for more than it.
I never said that Flowey was Low 2-C solely for affecting every Monster in the Underground. You talked about him being supposedly unable to kill the Monsters as an anti-feat contradicting Tier 2, and I pointed out that he already performed a comparable feat in this state anyway, which discredits the former. That's about it. The very fact that Flowey already had power exceeding that of every Monster in the Underground put together six times over should already settle this branch of the discussion, in my view.On top of not having done it yet he says that he can't yet because he needs more power, if he'll use that for more than it. O.Flowey being capable of affecting all of Monters with his power means nothing in regards to him being Low 2-C, ignoring how he missed someone there.
He lacked the power to do what he wanted, yes, and "what he wanted," in this case, was to destroy the whole world of Undertale, again given what Asriel says in the dialogue of his boss fight. Sure, you may say that is in itself already proves that Flowey isn't Low 2-C, but I am already arguing that individual SAVE Files can function as alternate timelines down there, so saying this would be kind of a moot point on its own, at this stage.You missed what I said. With a Human SOUL being able to cross the barrier O.Flowey having 6 should made him able to do the same, and yet you argued that his "current power isn't enough to break through the Barrier and extend his dominion over the outside world", to which I say that he could do the latter if he wanted to and that you made would now need to have the headcanon of him not wanting to pass through the barrier but destroy it also to make sense of it. All that when in reality, he simply lacked the power to do what he wanted. Heck if he can control gameworld itself in a way that is = to one-shotting it like you claim then he should by all means to able to destroy that thing too.
You seem to keep missing my point, in that regard. I am not saying Flowey is Low 2-C solely because he changed the text of the game; that much is just supporting context. The primary reasoning is that he describes himself as having full dominion over the gameworld (Which I am arguing is a Low 2-C structure, as said above), and that he can destroy SAVE Files. So, this is mostly a bunch of strawman arguments.Look if you have a comicbook and a character inside that can move its pages to go back and forward and that changes up time in the whole universe inside then good for that, if destroying the timeline inside the comic destroys the comic too then good for that too, but it doesn't mean that controlling random aspects of the comic makes the character Low 2-C, that is nonsense, a headcanon and has no evidence backing it up too. Destroying the timeline could have been so powerful than it destroyed the comic too, and even if they were much the same thing affecting some tiny aspects of it would not be as powerful as destroying all of it, changing present things shown on sight and texts is insignificant next to destroying everyone that is the thing.
Except that, again, Flowey's SAVE File leads to its own altered version of the gameworld that exists concurrently with the normal one, and Flowey himself refers to Frisk's world as "your old SAVE File," so those things pretty obviously contain more than information within themselves.Containing the progress yes, but what is progress in context? Same as when saving progress in a video editor on a file; the file isn't its own video, it doesn't have its length of time and the things shown to us (likewise a SAVE file doesn't have time or space like the timeline), the file from the video editor is just used to set how the video itself will be organized and this info is much less than the video itself. Translating the analogy Undertale is at least the video and maybe even the video editor too, meaning that a SAVE file doesn't even do what we used it for but it just leads to Undertale itself using it for it. With and without that, destroying 1 and making many of them aren't feats that matter Tier 2 wise.
Yes, and Omega Flowey describes himself as a God while and after flaunting his control over the gameworld to Frisk, and states the whole world is also his own, so, again, that does indicate he held enough dominion over it to qualify as Low 2-C. Base Flowey describing his DETERMINATION powers in similar terms doesn't matter when the context of the two statements is much different: Flowey before absorbing the six SOULs mostly controlled the gameworld by resetting it and then taking a different course of action than the one he took in the previous iteration of the Underground, and that's what "reshaping the world" and "playing God" were in reference to, things that obviously weren't as direct as what Omega Flowey does.
If you accept one interpretation of what he says as him being unable to kill even the monsters then that is a big point as it goes against him being Low 2-C in that state.Sure, but the existence of multiple interpretations doesn't really make all of them equally valid, especially when you put some of them under any amount of scrutiny. So, I don't know what your point is there.
That is contradictory, I said O. Flowey said to lack power, you say he really doesn't, but then you inform how he wanted to destroy the world, thing he would be able to do if he was Low 2-C. You're also wrong on the way you portray that;He really doesn't, at least not as directly as you're making it out to be. All he states is that he needs Frisk's SOUL to complete himself and then talks about how he will show "the real meaning of this world" to Humans and Monsters. Given Asriel's dialogue later on in the Pacifist Route, that tidbit was likely referring to how he was planning to destroy the world, since that was his main goal before Asriel's original personality took over.
Looking back at that bit idk why I worded that that way or what I meant at the time. Yes you never said that Flowey was Low 2-C solely for affecting every Monster in the Underground, but I still asked for proof of that feat being = in power to one-shotting all of them and not just hax. Needing a lot of power=/=having the power to one-shot every target of the hax, I bet some small and weak kid unable to one-shot an adult would need also describe the ability to rip their soul as hard work and stuff.I never said that Flowey was Low 2-C solely for affecting every Monster in the Underground. You talked about him being supposedly unable to kill the Monsters as an anti-feat contradicting Tier 2, and I pointed out that he already performed a comparable feat in this state anyway, which discredits the former. That's about it. The very fact that Flowey already had power exceeding that of every Monster in the Underground put together six times over should already settle this branch of the discussion, in my view.
Ok, I'll see to it.He lacked the power to do what he wanted, yes, and "what he wanted," in this case, was to destroy the whole world of Undertale, again given what Asriel says in the dialogue of his boss fight. Sure, you may say that is in itself already proves that Flowey isn't Low 2-C, but I am already arguing that individual SAVE Files can function as alternate timelines down there, so saying this would be kind of a moot point on its own, at this stage.
You have described this supporting context as part of the reasons to his AP, you shouldn't have. In fact as supporting context like this wouldn't even be on anyone's AP on cases like this I don't even see the point to bring it up to the discussion. You can make a thread to add in the tiering system how "full dominion over" something gives a tier over it, there exists things like controlling at the same level as destroying but Flowey isn't doing this to the thing and is only messing up tiny aspects out of hundreds of them, maybe even infinite of them as the timeline is. I'll see to the SAVE File stuff, again.You seem to keep missing my point, in that regard. I am not saying Flowey is Low 2-C solely because he changed the text of the game; that much is just supporting context. The primary reasoning is that he describes himself as having full dominion over the gameworld (Which I am arguing is a Low 2-C structure, as said above), and that he can destroy SAVE Files. So, this is mostly a bunch of strawman arguments.
Then you believe what you do based on a clear headcanon,Except that, again, Flowey's SAVE File leads to its own altered version of the gameworld that exists concurrently with the normal one, and Flowey himself refers to Frisk's world as "your old SAVE File," so those things pretty obviously contain more than information within themselves.
"Now, ENOUGH messing around! It's time to purge this timeline once and for all!"Asriel stops holding back when going 100%, the Hyper Goner was before it, thus, it wasn't his true power. It can be assumed that the Hyper Goner was unknown properties Asriel didn't expect Frisk to survive (Absorption, EE, something related to the lore on that attack's shape, we don't know, we know it was just a very strong attack while still not him at 100% and that is good enough).
When having infinity used it needs proof of it not being hyperbolic, that's the standard thing to think of it, it couldn't even mean that something being infinite is as in High 3-A but that it's "high" & if it wanted to could go higher, or it keeps becoming stronger over time. You would need a whole other thread to change the standards of the wiki.
He sure does, but if you have a character that says "Now I'm gonna destroy the universe", snaps his fingers, removes everything nearby via it, with we knowing the universe is still there, and then the character punches the floor and destroys the universe, then would it be intelligent or unintelligent to say that the snapping destroyed the universe? It would be unintelligent, because the character sure did unleash that right after saying it would destroy the universe, but if the universe is still there then the universe is still there, and if later something else destroys the universe then that something else is what destroys the universe. Do you understand this? Please see the blog linked above again."Now, ENOUGH messing around! It's time to purge this timeline once and for all!"
^ Asriel says this right before unleashing Hyper Goner.
It's pretty obvious judging by context that he's actually trying to kill Frisk with this attack so that he can "purge the timeline"
Imagine for a moment the Hyper Goner is ranked Low 2-C; would any of the following sentences be needed to be written on the AP of Asriel's profile when talking about the Hyper Goner?; "it was trying to kill Frisk", "its intended purpose was to murder Frisk", "it should be noted how Asriel was serious on the attack, not expecting Frisk to survive it". They wouldn't, the why of it being that because they don't matter. It doesn't matter how strong of an attack an attack is if it isn't Low 2-C, because "being strong" isn't part of a reason for something to be Low 2-C. If it fits into one's headcanon of why it would be Low 2-C then cool for it, but fitting into an idea=/=being a real reason.When Frisk takes a hit from Hyper Goner, their HP is reduced to 1, but subsequent hits don't affect them at all, and Asriel is later shown to be genuinely surprised that Frisk survived his attack.
He was destroying everything and then reset it. We know this much.(i.e., perform a True Reset, based on Flowey's post-game monologue).
I fail to this why all this stuff that everybody already knows matters at all. Yes Asriel before using his full power wasn't using his full power. I did see this before as talking for the sake of talking and it could be that I'm not wrong on it.Sure, he still wasn't using every bit of his power, but it goes to show that Asriel wasn't being remotely serious up until this point.
Also consider that at the beginning of the fight, Asriel says this:
"I don't care about destroying this world anymore. After I defeat you and gain total control over the timeline... I just want to reset everything."
Asriel could have annihilated Frisk at any point, which makes sense when Flowey with zero SOULs is already strong enough to (almost) one-shot Frisk. Instead, he chose to monologue about how he will force Frisk to play with him forever, then attempt to kill them, which barely failed because of their Determination. He definitely wasn't planning on using his full power.
Went over this in the last comment I made, I didn't need to but I did.Also, no offense, but I'm kind of disappointed in you for refusing to explain why Asriel's first form's infinite stats are hyperbolic.
None of this matters to the case of something being hyperbolic that you go against there, if some guy says legit things meant to be taken as 100% facts all the time then this doesn't matter if they one day say a hyperbole. On the risk of being rude I'll say that that example is on the level of intelligence as believing those stats aren't hyperbolic and could be used to make the character High Universe level.We know that CHECK stats are a reliable way of scaling monsters to each other for various reasons, and using CHECK stats, we can tell that Undyne, a well-trained warrior, is far stronger than Monster Kid, an untrained child. In turn, Asgore and Toriel are even stronger than Undyne, owing to their status as Boss Monsters. All of these people still pale in comparison to a monster that has absorbed one human SOUL, which is already so strong that nearly every monster SOUL currently existing would need to combine to be able to rival its power.
Asriel, at the time of fighting Frisk, is a monster that has achieved similar power to seven human SOULs: the combined SOULs of all but one monster, plus the six human SOULs collected by Asgore. As we know from statements by Flowey and Undyne, a monster with seven human SOULs' worth of power is straight-up a god. They can break the barrier by themselves, but more importantly, they have enough power to literally end the entire world. Even a monster with a single human SOUL is strong enough to be easily capable of killing humans and shrugging off their attacks- however, they are still subject to the weaknesses of any other monster, which is how Asriel died even with Chara's SOUL.
Not saying that it necessary has to given the other takes I gave but it absolutely can be referring to Gaster, you took the liberty to interpret "don't exist" as "not existing in on one's whole timeline" and not "from the present moment forward", there is no reason for it. And besides it ignores the depressing meaning the kid's likely going for; the world isn't the same without you, but in the grand scheme of things it may as well be and what difference does it make to not be there, regardless of do mattering.It can't be talking about Gaster. He created the technology used in Core which is being used till this day. That doesn't fit with Goner Kid's line, a "a world where you don't exist and everything goes the same without you"
Again, you took the liberty to interpret he would go nonexistent for some reason, nothing goes against you "going into a place, not finding someone, and in other occasion doing the same and finding someone", who said anything about the NPC doing nonexistent of all things when that small process to find him is something taken right of real life. He's just not there at the time. You do find him while other players didn't and he pretty much says "Imagine you didn't find me, what about it? Scary thought", as pretty much "Why do I matter?/Why do we matter?", fitting to how he can be said to not matter as his encounter is unlikely to happen and doesn't change anything, therefore giving him the right on what he says and we dealing with Undertale being meta.I also disagree with the line being about encounter probability. Undertake is meta, but there's absolutely nothing that suggests an NPC goes nonexistent if we don't encounter them/their event is triggered
Unfortunately saying that there are multiple timelines in Undertale (as in the game Chara destroyed) is headcanon based on the info given. 2 more likely takes go like this;I'll give you that this may be in universe speculation but there's rarely a time where you put a line like this and have it not mean anything in terms of the overall worldbuilding. I think this statement combined with the fact that there are variations in the game according to FUN values is supposed to point to there being multiple timelines
I have no idea why you take this not only literally but with 1 possible interpretation despite it having many that fit with everything and don't contradict solid lore and proven statements going against the idea of Undertale having many timelines, simply put that doesn't make sense. Don't take it in a vacuum, the context of all the takes make them far more likely and you don't seem to want to to face them for some reason; Him talking about Gaster for example, can you tell me to the face that "Imagine a world where you don't exist" would objectively be a stretchy way for some kid on a non-formal conversation to start referring to Gaster's case? It's perfectly legit, all takes are headcanons as this "statement" is just a vague thought given by some character, but your headcanon on the matter is one you claim has to apply in an overly ambitious manner, when it plain simply isn't a fact that changes the context of the world-building and certain feats & ambitions of characters as we know them. That's crazy. It's just meant to make us think what he meant by it with all reasonale takes going as "it's possible" while at the end of the day it was just some kid giving a thought.The fact that he calls it a "world where you don't exist" seems much more like alternate worlds than the kid making some statement about you not finding him. Your interpretation honestly sounds more like a headcanon to me and a streach
Honestly I think UT having one timeline would be better narrative wise, but this statement points to multiple timelines when taken as a point of world building.