• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Marvel Cosmology Downgrade

Status
Not open for further replies.
The actual question here is why he's supporting these actions deserving warranted criticism.
I meant that his criticism towards you has largely seemed warranted.

Anyway, can you two stop being ongoing bothers who take any opportunity to attack and waste other people's time, and try to shape up your behaviours and attitudes instead, please? You are not currently contributing anything positive to this community as far as I can tell.
 
Anyway, can you two stop being ongoing bothers who take any opportunity to attack and waste other people's time, and try to shape up your behaviours and attitudes instead, please? You are not currently contributing anything positive to this community as far as I can tell
I am not contributing anything positive? The entire Post-Flashpoint DC street tiers were 9-B before I came in.

And when have I attacked you? I have been trying to stay civil and respectful towards you this whole time. You say I am being passive-aggressive, but you are being direct-aggressive. There's nothing about our attitude, we have been calm this entire time, and disagreeing with you and Deagon is not wasting any time, especially since you aren't even reading my posts and blindly believing Deagon. By this logic I could just as easily say you are wasting my time. Deagon himself has only stated I was debunked, and taking his word for it would be explicit bias. I don't believe I have been debunked, and I have asked certain questions which neither of you have answered. Due to this, I believe I have a right to continue.

Moreover, large verses like this needs 3+ staff members' approval to my knowledge.
 
It's remarkable how an already messy thread becomes an additional tier of derailed as soon as these two show up.
It wouldn't have gotten derailed if you guys hadn't constantly said we are stonewalling/derailing and also calling us bothers. At the beginning I was completely focusing on the Macroverse/Microverse, it wasn't until you started attacking us(that is, you derailed) the thread got derailed.
 
It wouldn't have gotten derailed if you guys hadn't constantly said we are stonewalling/derailing and also calling us bothers
You've got it backwards. Us calling out the behavior that caused the derailing is not derailing. You both came in here with extremely bad arguments and stonewalling despite being proven wrong. Here we are 3 pages later, and neither of you have conceded despite being debunked.

Frankly, the staff and knowledgeable members of the forum do not have the time and resources to babysit every thread that you two derail with bad faith arguing. You are both fresh off a ban for vote manipulation and trying to get me banned for exposing it. If you are committed to making your presence on this forum as problematic and argumentative as possible, then perhaps the staff needs to consider barring your participation in comic book discussions, since it so routinely leads to pages of nonsense.
 
Well, you are relentlessly wasting enormous amounts of my time in multiple threads at the same time, by being completely unreasonable, time which I need to use to handle my ongoing maintenance tasks for this community as a whole, while helping to take the opportunity to gang up on me with other members who have grudges against me.

Anyway, Qawsedf234 seemed to agree with my reasoning for why the infinite-dimensional nexuses are multiversal rather than being confined by single universes, and it doesn't make any logical sense for them to be confined in such a manner in the first place as they lead to anywhere within the multiverse, and it doesn't make any sense to upgrade all powerful superheroes and supervillains to High 1-B, so can we please leave that discussion behind us and try to get something productive done here?
 
Last edited:
You've got it backwards. Us calling out the behavior that caused the derailing is not derailing. You both came in here with extremely bad arguments and stonewalling despite being proven wrong. Here we are 3 pages later, and neither of you have conceded despite being debunked.

Frankly, the staff and knowledgeable members of the forum do not have the time and resources to babysit every thread that you two derail with bad faith arguing. You are both fresh off a ban for vote manipulation and trying to get me banned for exposing it. If you are committed to making your presence on this forum as problematic and argumentative as possible, then perhaps the staff needs to consider barring your participation in comic book discussions, since it so routinely leads to pages of nonsense.
Strongly agreed.
 
Well, you are relentlessly wasting enormous amounts of my time in multiple threads at the same time, by being completely unreasonable, time which I need to use to handle my ongoing maintenance tasks for this community as a whole, while helping to take the opportunity to gang up on me with other members who have grudges against me.

Anyway, Qawsedf234 seemed to agree with my reasoning for why the infinite-dimensional nexuses are multiversal rather than being confined by single universes, and it doesn't make any logical sense for them to be confined in such a manner in the first place, and it doesn't make any sense to upgrade all ppwerful superheroes and supervillains to High 1-B, so can we please leave that discussion behind us and try to get something productive done here?
Yes, we can't allow characters who are 2-C that even 2-C is too large for scale to that.
 
I see. Did anyone mention this scan?
main-qimg-b629060db5f647f1098bcadeee17da4e
@Immortalgodd already had a say on it.

Dreams folded inside dreams is vague,
Each universe a thought within a larger thought and each containing smaller thought within itself is probably talking about the Microverse (which even silver surfer said he has experience about the worlds within world phenomenon) as shown here (saying even atoms may contain an endless cosmos).
 
@Immortalgodd already had a say on it.

Dreams folded inside dreams is vague,
Each universe a thought within a larger thought and each containing smaller thought within itself is probably talking about the Microverse (which even silver surfer said he has experience about the worlds within world phenomenon) as shown here (saying even atoms may contain an endless cosmos).
Indeed. The scan was a settled matter on page 3. It only got dragged out this far due to stonewalling.
 
@Immortalgodd already had a say on it.

Dreams folded inside dreams is vague,
Each universe a thought within a larger thought and each containing smaller thought within itself is probably talking about the Microverse (which even silver surfer said he has experience about the worlds within world phenomenon) as shown here (saying even atoms may contain an endless cosmos).
Qualitative superiority, and endless universe contained within an atom, is that by definition. Tho, however, the issue was so derailed that I feel I can't even comment properly on the microverse and macroverse, because it didn't let conclude on the Multiverse part.
 
I was asked to give input here. I don't know much about high tier Marvel. But I will be moderating the thread. Guys, please maintain a civility and don't get heated. You can always take a step back and come back later. And the thread is already 9 pages long so it will help if no more derailing takes place.
 
Anyway, I really hope that you will be very careful to not allow overly extreme upgrades that do not make logical sense with the context of the setting as a whole, as I have to leave and perform other tasks now.

@Deagonx @Eficiente @Firestorm808 @Elizio33 @Qawsedf234

I would greatly appreciate your help with keeping this revision from not going completely out of control please. Our Marvel Comics statistics have increasingly gone completely to hell since Impress left.
Sorry. I haven't had the time to do a lot of the scan sourcing and such.
 
Qualitative superiority, and endless universe contained within an atom, is that by definition. Tho, however, the issue was so derailed that I feel I can't even comment properly on the microverse and macroverse, because it didn't let conclude on the Multiverse part.
Dreams folded inside dreams is vague nothing about qualitative superiority, if it said dreams dreaming the world and another dream dreaming that world I'd agree but dreams folded inside dreams doesn't mean anything and a possible endless universe within an atom also isn't transcendence if isn't stated to be from a higher dimensional perspective, for all we know those sub-atomic universes still exist inside of the 3-D reality.
 
Dreams folded inside dreams is vague nothing about qualitative superiority, if it said dreams dreaming the world and another dream dreaming that world I'd agree but dreams folded inside dreams doesn't mean anything and a possible endless universe within an atom also isn't transcendence if isn't stated to be from a higher dimensional perspective, for all we know those sub-atomic universes still exist inside of the 3-D reality.
In fact, if I'm just going to do something like scientific dream interpretation, I can make a sampling. As in the movie "inception", dreams are layered. The bottom layer does not affect the top layer. A single top layer spoils all the bottom layer under it. So, like dream sampling, layered superiority can be found, in short, an endless layered transition. :)
 
I addressed those arguments in my last large reply.
Dreams folded inside dreams is vague,
I don't see how it is. It literally means dreams are folded inside larger dreams, and these are universes. It's explicitly stating each universe is viewed as a dream by a larger universe, and that larger universe itself is a dream to an even larger universe. It's a very blatant scan.
Each universe a thought within a larger thought and each containing smaller thought within itself is probably talking about the Microverse (which even silver surfer said he has experience about the worlds within world phenomenon) as shown here (saying even atoms may contain an endless cosmos).
The issue with that scan is that it's ancient(I believe around 1968) and came before it was revealed universes cannot exist within atoms(that is, when the misconception was prevalent)

image.png


So Dormammu couldn't have been referring to the Microverse(also the fact he said "worlds within worlds" and not "a world within a world"). The Microverse being parallel is not debatable.

Guidebook confirmation-

image.png


Not just that, but before Dormammu said that, it was revealed that the Microverse existed outside the entire Multiverse, and it explicitly mentions the Microverse being different from the equiverse-

image.png

Okay. So can we leave that argumentation behind us as well then, please?
Screenshot_20210727-005750.jpg
 
But if the official Marvel guidebook currently considers the Microverse as a parallel universe that is simply accessed by shrinking, then there is no qualitative superiority involved at all.

Also, even if there were, we always use the ground layer for each settings to gauge tiers by, or we would end up with tier 1 regular citizens such as Aunt May. We even have general rules for this if I remember correctly.
 
Last edited:
I'll try to compile

Working on the blog now.

Thank you, but we already reached a common staff conclusion regarding universal sizes in a previous content revision thread, so I would greatly appreciate if you do not bring up that issue again.

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Marvel_Comics?so=search#The_Size_of_the_Marvel_Universe

If this is going to become a problem, we will need to instate a discussion rule.
 
But if the official Marvel guidebook currently considers the Microverse as a parallel universe that is simply accessed by shrinking, then there is no qualitative superiority involved at all.
That's the point, Sama-D wasn't referring to the Microverse. That's what I have been saying this whole time. So do you agree with me?
Also, even if there were, we always use the ground layer for each settings to gauge tiers by, or we would end up with tier 1 regular citizens such as Aunt May. We even have rules for this if I remember correctly.
Idk what the ground layer is.
 
@Transcending

You said High 1-B because of inf universe viewing lower one as a dream right? Then where does regular universe in Marvel exist in chain?
 
That's the point, Sama-D wasn't referring to the Microverse. That's what I have been saying this whole time. So do you agree with me?
Agree with what exactly? I do not agree about qualitative superiority to a parallel universe, even if there has been a retcon.
Idk what the ground layer is.
The 3-dimensional universes for the main setting where the comic book stories take place.
 
Agree with what exactly? I do not agree about qualitative superiority to a parallel universe, even if there has been a retcon.
I agree that parallel universes don't have QS, but Sama-D was explicitly referring to universes within universes and directly mentioned QS(dreams and thoughts). So my argument is that he wasn't referring to the Microverse in the first place.
 
I agree that parallel universes don't have QS, but Sama-D was explicitly referring to universes within universes and directly mentioned QS(dreams and thoughts). So my argument is that he wasn't referring to the Microverse in the first place.
Then what is he referring to?
 
It goes downwards from the Macroverse, that much I can certain. I am not sure if it goes upwards or downwards from the equiverse however.
Higher planes exist above Marcoverse, Microverse and regular multiverse/quantum realities. so, it's pretty clear dream universes exist in a plane lower than baseline layer.
Normal universes
That means normal humans in alt universes infinitely transcend humans in another universe if it's about multiverse? Bruh.
 
Higher planes exist above Marcoverse, Microverse and regular multiverse/quantum realities. so, it's pretty clear dream universes exist in a plane lower than baseline layer.
I am not sure what you mean by layer?
That means normal humans in alt universes infinitely transcend humans in another universe if it's about multiverse? Bruh.
Wdym? Do you mean if normal humans in a universe infinitely transcend a parallel universe? In that case, no.
 
In fact, if I'm just going to do something like scientific dream interpretation, I can make a sampling. As in the movie "inception", dreams are layered. The bottom layer does not affect the top layer. A single top layer spoils all the bottom layer under it. So, like dream sampling, layered superiority can be found, in short, an endless layered transition. :)
I addressed those arguments in my last large reply.

I don't see how it is. It literally means dreams are folded inside larger dreams, and these are universes. It's explicitly stating each universe is viewed as a dream by a larger universe, and that larger universe itself is a dream to an even larger universe. It's a very blatant scan.

The issue with that scan is that it's ancient(I believe around 1968) and came before it was revealed universes cannot exist within atoms(that is, when the misconception was prevalent)

image.png


So Dormammu couldn't have been referring to the Microverse(also the fact he said "worlds within worlds" and not "a world within a world"). The Microverse being parallel is not debatable.

Guidebook confirmation-

image.png


Not just that, but before Dormammu said that, it was revealed that the Microverse existed outside the entire Multiverse, and it explicitly mentions the Microverse being different from the equiverse-

image.png


Screenshot_20210727-005750.jpg
Will reply later, currently in class.
 
I am not sure what you mean by layer?
3D world/man's universe
Wdym? Do you mean if normal humans in a universe infinitely transcend a parallel universe? In that case, no.
Then there is no QS between the universes. if there is an actual reality>fiction transcendence between universes/ what you said as viewing as dreams, then beings in higher universes must transcend over lower universes. (which you said exist parellely)

We already know there is no QS between parallel universes in Marvel Multiverse. (literary commen sense)
 
3D world/man's
The higher planes that exist above the Macroverse also exists above the 3D world.
Then there is no QS between the universes. if there is an actual reality>fiction transcendence between universes/ what you said as viewing as dreams, then beings in higher universes must transcend over lower universes. (which you said exist parellely)
Not exactly I said. I said the Microverse exists parallel to the equiverse, "normal" universes other than the Microverse do exists layered. There are other parallel universes too of course, but also layered ones.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top