Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tell me without telling me you haven't read the op completely and just nitpicking.I disagree. Nothing here implies an extradimensional space. Countless doesn't necessarily equate to something being infinite, it could mean too many to be counted.
The Silver sea's time flow being independent of the bubbles doesn't add up to your conclusion that the silver sea is a separate bigger(extradimensional space) space continuum. Just because the silver sea's time flow is independent does not necessarily mean it is a extradimensional space.
This would just really mean that the Silver Sea is a separate but really large space continuum.
Not really as having multiple infinite multiverses is still the same as having infinite universes. Here the size actually goes beyond thatSince if we're abusing this "infinite bigger than infinite is higher dimension!" you would bump a fuckton of verses where even 2 infinite multiverses would be qualified as one as lo
I'd be surprised if he said he read something, it's harder to find a structure that isn't infinite in size in MGK.Tell me without telling me you haven't read the op completely and just nitpicking.
Thank you for helping out, Elizhaa.Like ActuallySpaceMan, I can see 5D being fine; the wording fits the whole "subset" thing in our tiering system.
For 6-D, I don't think the evidence is enough. I remember DontTalkDT and Ultima Reality explaining why such cases would not necessarily be higher-dimensional.
Using DontTalk's explanations, assuming the bubbles are 5-D, doesn't make the silver sea 6-D from the math.
I updated the OP thread content and also quoted @Elizhaa to take a look at it (added new context/evidence). So let's wait till he reviews them again.Anyway, should we go with Elizhaa's conclusions here then, in lack of better options?
Anyway, should we go with Elizhaa's conclusions here then, in lack of better options?
Okay.I updated the OP thread content and also quoted @Elizhaa to take a look at it (added new context/evidence). So let's wait till he reviews them again.
I apologize for not including them at the start.
OFF Topic. If you want to share something, then do it in the verse thread...Also this is unrelated but Yoshinori Shizuma (MGK illustrator) stated this in his/her twitter account:
Translations:
Source and Yoshinori offical twitter account"The art book is a collection of records, so I made an illustration with that kind of nuance. In the work, an item called "Sosei Arial" that contains the memories of Anos appears, and with that as a hint, the worldview that stores memories and records in physical things is expanded. The image is that each black box around you has a record of the story embedded in it, and Anos sits on top of that story. If you look closely, you can see the silhouette of someone wearing a hood in the background, but the space is surrounded by statues of the races that appear in the work: demons, humans, spirits, gods, and dragon men. It's a mysterious space with a box of records floating in it."
Might aswell get a fluent japanese translator to translate the statement properly because I'm pretty sure that this might give anos something, as far as I know Artbook & statement from author/illustrator can be used for feat as long as it cannon like this one.
ps: if y'all already knew ab this and it a useless statement then feel free to ignore this lol
My bad, should I remove the post and repost it in the verse thread?OFF Topic. If you want to share something, then do it in the verse thread...
I would say yes. Thanks.My bad, should I remove the post and repost it in the verse thread?
The first evidence sounds to be a range limitation. I am curious if you have the scans; though, on this point currently, I don’t see 6-D being valid unless there are more valid elaborations on how the silver sea has everything as something insignificant subset of itself. I won’t continue further since you said you would leave the point for another thread.Hey, Elizhaa! How are you doing? Are you fine? I don't want to take your time much, but I added new info and a new scan in my OP thread (under the 1-C category).
I will copy it for you here and review it, tho! Thanks for you being here. Also, if you don't mind, can you ping Ultima and DT to view it as well, tho?
Here is the new explanation and the scans are already in my OP thread (new ones). Hopes, you enjoy it!
Also, another note: This does not scale to the whole Silver Sea, only to Silver bubbles being 6D. So Anos will still have 99+ layers of hax.
The cosmology is still infinitely larger, and I will do the next CRT after silver bubbles 6D is accepted.
I will give my argument and scan for thisThe 6-D silver bubble points seem weak to me. I am also curious if you have the evidences, but I will leave my thoughts first. If I recall correctly, chief gods' higher-dimensional existence are accepted as 4-D scaling from 4-D worlds; if they were accepted from transcending the world accurately, they would have been 5-D or Low 1-C already.
You're keep repeating what I've already, said twice. That's one of the reasons why I stopped because of the great disadvantages I'm having right now. Everyone knows that this site ignores the skepticism of Continuum Hypothesis, or accepting GCH to be precisely.they would not be separate things, we interpret them as separate things but an infinite universe does not occupy more space than 2.
i'm pretty sure the wiki assumes gch and thus |R| = Aleph-1. Even if it didn't the requirement would just exclude the real number definition and keep it as Aleph-1.
Same reply as above, being larger than N doesn't always means R being reached. Well, I don't think this opinion of mine matter since this wikia Tiering System completely ignores the skepticism of Continuum Hypothesis.
I find it's difficult to argue here since I disagree with the previous 2-A Bubble Worlds CRT, I disagree with the Tiering System standards, and I don't like arguing against raw scans that too much replying on machine translators where their credibility become seriously questioned. So I'll stop here.
Oh yeah it does? I don't understand how you could say that after asserting that there is no strict cardinal between countable and uncountable sets. Multiple infinite multiverses being equal to one occur because of bijection, I'm making a scenario if a verse treats them as superior to one. That means there's no such thing as above the 2-A baseline because after 2-A (which is infinite) you go straight to the Low 1-C if this standard is getting abused.Not really as having multiple infinite multiverses is still the same as having infinite universes. Here the size actually goes beyond that
I will try to reply later. I am kinda busyThe first evidence sounds to be a range limitation. I am curious if you have the scans; though, on this point currently, I don’t see 6-D being valid unless there are more valid elaborations on how the silver sea has everything as something insignificant subset of itself. I won’t continue further since you said you would leave the point for another thread.
The 6-D silver bubble points seem weak to me. I am also curious if you have the evidences, but I will leave my thoughts first. If I recall correctly, chief gods' higher-dimensional existence are accepted as 4-D scaling from 4-D worlds; if they were accepted from transcending the world accurately, they would have been 5-D or Low 1-C already.
Kinda busy. I will try to reply later. If you have some arguments drop it.
The first evidence sounds to be a range limitation. I am curious if you have the scans; though, on this point currently, I don’t see 6-D being valid unless there are more valid elaborations on how the silver sea has everything as something insignificant subset of itself. I won’t continue further since you said you would leave the point for another thread.
The 6-D silver bubble points seem weak to me. I am also curious if you have the evidences, but I will leave my thoughts first. If I recall correctly, chief gods' higher-dimensional existence are accepted as 4-D scaling from 4-D worlds; if they were accepted from transcending the world accurately, they would have been 5-D or Low 1-C already.
Reality>fiction difference is not the only way to get higher dimensionality. Look at Gurren Laggan. So stop if you don't have patience to read whole thing. What you just said is nitpicking. Wait for staffs to comment. I am not gonna bother even if you reply. I will wait for Eliza to take a look. You just picked 3 lines and ignored the whole context.Can't believe I read all that but
Here are the important quotes
"The dimensions of power are too different" has nothing to do with ontological dimensions
And "this would exceed the world's limit" also has nothing to do with ontological difference.
And "the power of everything is in another dimension" also has zero to do with ontological differences
And "Eques tries to crush me with a force that seems to exceed the upper limits of order." Has absolutely nothing to do with ontological differences.
Just bunch of flowery quotes that has nothing to do with R>F
Also where are you seeing uncountable infinite realities?
Don't care if you reply or not. GL has string universes IIRC.Reality>fiction difference is not the only way to get higher dimensionality. Look at Gurren Laggan. So stop if you don't have patience to read whole thing. What you just said is nitpicking. Wait for staffs to comment. I am not gonna bother even if you reply. I will wait for Eliza to take a look. You just picked 3 lines and ignored the whole context.
when valentine's day comes round this forum's gonna be horny as hell bro for the past week or so i've seen like 3 confessions of loveDread is my crush, Dread is my future wife, Dread is my life itself so I neutral to agree with the upgrade.im having fun reading all the heated arguments lmfao
I love flirting with random women so you might aswell see me go all out on valentine day anyways Im gonna change my opinion from Neutral-Agree to fully agree with 5D-6D.when valentine's day comes round this forum's gonna be horny as hell bro for the past week or so i've seen like 3 confessions of love
Meh, kinda already knew this kinda stuff would barely get accepted but lemme just say it's not flowery language or metaphors, they're all literal.Don't care if you reply or not. GL has string universes IIRC.
And I read the whole thing and still there is nothing here is R>F or ontological.
R>F is not the only way there are others but you have failed to provide those
for now they agreed with 5D and are neutral to disagree with 6DWhats the current staff voting?
One staff agreed on 5D bubble other staff has no reason just said from his belief he is disgreed and around 20+ people agreed with 5D Upgrade and neutral on 6D and pain and 2-3 disgree because they don't understand how the verse cosmology worksWhats the current staff voting?
30+ I assume, I did not upgrade the voting tally because I got confused lol ;-;One staff agreed on 5D bubble other staff has no reason just said from his belief he is disgreed and around 20+ people agreed with 5D Upgrade and neutral on 6D and pain and 2-3 disgree because they don't understand how the verse cosmology works
Now we are just arguing for 6D scale..
What do you mean?No wonder it got easily upgraded....
5 pages = easily upgradedNo wonder it got easily upgraded....
5 pages full of "agree" or "neutral" votes so yeah5 pages = easily upgraded
tbh, only the first page till ya, let's not comment.5 pages full of "agree" or "neutral" votes so yeah