• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Maou Gakuin Misleading Hax Revisions - Part 1/3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sheila Grandsley turning into what she apparently was 'just an embodiment of' (a spirit sword), it being a pivotal point in the story that turned the tides in a near defeat confrontation with Lay and Anos against Melheis' battle tactics..

Great War Tree in Volume 4 being one who is the spirit that gives knowledge and wisdom for surviving the Great War... -sounds literal to me-

The reveal of Misa being Avos Dilhevia likely just would NOT exist..

that's some of the more verbatim examples
Does not really mean anything. They would be AE Type 1 iff they were the abstractions themselves, yet they are not, they are its embodiments. The statement is talking about spirits in generaI:
Spirits are strange creatures. Their existence is said to come to be from the hearts of others. Legends, folklore, rumors, desires, fears, aspirations... They are the realization and embodiment of all of the above. One’s extreme fear of fire has the potential to birth fire spirits, and a rise in religious faith can birth water spirits.
“I’m aware. Spirits are the realization of rumors, folklore, and legends—the embodiment of hopes, fears, and desires.
That was also the reason she had been able to transform into her true form, a form similar to the adamantine sword. A spirit’s true form was the embodiment of their rumor or legend, and at the core of that was the heart.
Yeah, this makes it clear that they are the embodiment of abstractions, not abstractions themselves.
 
Does not really mean anything. They would be AE Type 1 iff they were the abstractions themselves, yet they are not, they are its embodiments. The statement is talking about spirits in generaI:



Yeah, this makes it clear that they are the embodiment of abstractions, not abstractions themselves.
I do not have extensive knowledges of MGK aside from Anime, but from neutral standpoint, this argument, i think you nitpicking the definition of texts without actually analyzing contexts. Realization, embodiment or representation of abstraction can well mean you are the abstraction itself. The standard isn't as rigid as you must have only statement like: character A is the abstraction itself blah blah blah

Anyway i remain neutral on this whole AE1 part to see the arguments from both sides before voting
 
Last edited:
Embodiment doesn't inherently assert that you're merely the tangible form of a particular abstraction. It can also mean you're the visible form of that abstraction, which grammatically, doesn't necessarily imply you're materially constructed.

I believe you're hyper-focusing on the usage of Embodiment for Type 2 Abstract Existence, without realizing the nuance in that usage. It's not saying if a sentence contains this specific word, it falls under Type 2. It's just that Embodiment, as a word, can mean an ideal or quality has been given tangible form, not that it can only mean that.
 
Does not really mean anything. They would be AE Type 1 iff they were the abstractions themselves, yet they are not, they are its embodiments. The statement is talking about spirits in generaI:



Yeah, this makes it clear that they are the embodiment of abstractions, not abstractions themselves.
what forms the spirit is the very lore of origin

1ZSFbmD.png

and how they remain as lore even if source is destroyed and reform their source
ZdIHgSL.png


end of the lore = their end , or going against the lore = their end
the great war ended so the lore of a great war tree who helped human in great war also ended , so the tree ceased to exist

8XioKB3.png


even spirit's can die referring to the fact that their lore is being eaten
m4BFGP2.png


so they are the lore itself ,which is their abstraction
legend and rumors are the continuation of the origin lore , which can change as they spreads
like a spirit born from the lore of it being longest snake , it rumors got so exaggerated that it became able to wrap the world 333 times
RcbACwc.png
 
Does not really mean anything. They would be AE Type 1 iff they were the abstractions themselves, yet they are not, they are its embodiments. The statement is talking about spirits in generaI:



Yeah, this makes it clear that they are the embodiment of abstractions, not abstractions themselves.
You do realize embody means, to be an expression of smth right?
 
Embodiment doesn't inherently assert that you're merely the tangible form of a particular abstraction. It can also mean you're the visible form of that abstraction, which grammatically, doesn't necessarily imply you're materially constructed.

I believe you're hyper-focusing on the usage of Embodiment for Type 2 Abstract Existence, without realizing the nuance in that usage. It's not saying if a sentence contains this specific word, it falls under Type 2. It's just that Embodiment, as a word, can mean an ideal or quality has been given tangible form, not that it can only mean that.
Yeah, even looking at it from another perspective, here we have the raw.
精霊というのは奇妙な生き物だ。その存在は、数多無数の者の心から生み出されると言われている。伝承や伝説、噂、願望、恐怖、希望……それらが具象・具現化したものが精霊なのだ。
And if we ask ChatGPT the translation is
Spirits are strange creatures. Their existence is said to be born from the hearts of countless beings. Legends, myths, rumors, desires, fears, hopes... these are the things that manifest and take form as spirits.
It is MTL so it should not be used without translator verification, but you can see what I mean.
 
what forms the spirit is the very lore of origin

1ZSFbmD.png

and how they remain as lore even if source is destroyed and reform their source
ZdIHgSL.png


end of the lore = their end , or going against the lore = their end
the great war ended so the lore of a great war tree who helped human in great war also ended , so the tree ceased to exist

8XioKB3.png


even spirit's can die referring to the fact that their lore is being eaten
m4BFGP2.png


so they are the lore itself ,which is their abstraction
legend and rumors are the continuation of the origin lore , which can change as they spreads
like a spirit born from the lore of it being longest snake , it rumors got so exaggerated that it became able to wrap the world 333 times
RcbACwc.png
Another evidence is that it is said that memories (which includes anything from which the spirit is done) form the source of the Spirit.

 
Yeah, even looking at it from another perspective, here we have the raw.

And if we ask ChatGPT the translation is

It is MTL so it should not be used without translator verification, but you can see what I mean.
A question, say theoretically speaking they win with their argument. The spirits would still have type 1 due to source, the ss the previous person sent already showed that they're born from a source created from a legend or rumor. So how does this go anywhere exactly?
 
By the way, it seems the OP became NEP after creating the thread with Astral's arguments, so I'm asking him now to update the tally. I completely disagree with the thread based on my arguments and also on the part of the spirits given the evidence that others have provided here, be sure to put in the OP the arguments that were already dropped, such as Invulnerability and Immortality Type 1.

I ask the others present here to express their votes after having read the arguments of both sides to be added to the tally.
 
I ask the others present here to express their votes after having read the arguments of both sides to be added to the tally.
Just gonna ask this, Has the regeneration/immortally regarding spirits been discussed so far? (Mainly 1 and 3)
 
Just gonna ask this, Has the regeneration/immortally regarding spirits been discussed so far? (Mainly 1 and 3)
Just to mention that I'm sleepy right now so I might go to sleep after this so forgive my writing.
Regeneration yes, although seeing the OP's arguments in reality there was not much to refute, since they can regenerate from their source (concept) but being dependent on their lore. OP mentioned something about there not being a specific section on the page about half spirits, that will be handled later.

And immortality, the argument was already given but now I'm too sleepy to see all those scans that were sent and arguments, so I'll leave that part to someone else to expose it.
 
Also, reading the OP is a headache, all cluttered and without sections.

Anyway that's all from my side.
 
Just gonna ask this, Has the regeneration/immortally regarding spirits been discussed so far? (Mainly 1 and 3)
Well, spirits can live forever as long as their rumors, memories, legends or whatever the spirit is made of remains in existence, I just don't know if that's enough for Immo 1, for now, I don't think there is anything for Immo 3.
 
Last edited:
Well, spirits can live forever as long as their rumors, memories, legends or whatever the spirit is made of remains in existence, I just don't know if that's enough for Immo 1, for now, I don't think there is anything for Immo 3.
this can be immortality type 3 ig, as long as lore exists them fading away isn't a problem

MJq8DzJ.png

and can revive over and over again
 
I see "Spirit" is just abstract existence type 1 - information aspect type 1, surely "source of spirit" is abstract existence type 1 - information aspect type 2 because Source of Spirit governs Spirit
 
I agree with the HGR removal, I still have to read the second part of volume 4 but the first one is already finished. Also, those scans lack a lot of context.


First Nosgalia talks about if he is destroyed, the world will fall apart, it will not stand. Then he talks about the power of the goddess that can destroy it, yes, that is correct. But the statement of the world does it before, also maybe he can destroy it, he refers to destroying it completely, because he can regenerate her source with 10%, but she does not say that she can regenerate from the "complete destruction of her source". It would have been fine for me, if they had not made that the source can be divided, corroded, etc. That statement that it can regenerate its source, for me, speaks to the state in which Anos left it, that is, at 10%.

Also, why are they so sure that Nostalgia can fully return after its destruction, if Nosgalia himself got angry that Anos could control the power of the goddess (Negation his regeneration). He didn't even know that he could control her power anymore. So it's strange that they keep claiming that she regenerates even if her source is completely destroyed.


Although that is also the only claim they use, don't they have a mention or feat that regenerates from its completely destroyed source?

I was planning to continue reading the novel, so my knowledge is little.
 
OP really needs to make a TLDR of proposed removals.

For now I'll just follow until then.
 
I agree with the HGR removal, I still have to read the second part of volume 4 but the first one is already finished. Also, those scans lack a lot of context.



First Nosgalia talks about if he is destroyed, the world will fall apart, it will not stand. Then he talks about the power of the goddess that can destroy it, yes, that is correct. But the statement of the world does it before, also maybe he can destroy it, he refers to destroying it completely, because he can regenerate her source with 10%, but she does not say that she can regenerate from the "complete destruction of her source". It would have been fine for me, if they had not made that the source can be divided, corroded, etc. That statement that it can regenerate its source, for me, speaks to the state in which Anos left it, that is, at 10%.

Also, why are they so sure that Nostalgia can fully return after its destruction, if Nosgalia himself got angry that Anos could control the power of the goddess (Negation his regeneration). He didn't even know that he could control her power anymore. So it's strange that they keep claiming that she regenerates even if her source is completely destroyed.



Although that is also the only claim they use, don't they have a mention or feat that regenerates from its completely destroyed source?

I was planning to continue reading the novel, so my knowledge is little.
Didn't knew Nosgalia being addressed as her before 😭.

Beside everything is already been refuted by dereck.
 
at this point it's retreading old ground that makes no sense for the story if you take it away 😭 it's so.. is all that can be done is repeat???
 
Seems like the boys are already handling this well but I'll go over everything.
Abstract Existence (Type 1; Information, Stories, Emotions, Beliefs; Spirits are strange creatures, their existence is said to be akin to magic itself. Their existence is said to come from the hearts of others. Legends, folklore, rumors, fears, beliefs, aspirations, Spirits are the realization and embodiment of these)
Mind you, the wording itself says "embodiment and realization", and so does the scan, so what's the Type 1 for?

Additionally, from other Volumes:

“Type 2: Embodies an abstraction, and can be resurrected or regenerate indefinitely thanks to it. Destroying the abstraction is required to permanently kill those characters, but they can still be affected without directly altering it.„

So, yes, the Type 1 should be changed to Type 2 unless there's something hinting they are not merely embodiments of them, but those abstract things themselves.

It also needs to be clarified which type of Information is being talked about here. As for me, I only see Type 1 Information here.
It seems some people just do not know how not to contradict themselves. Right below this, you posted scans and talked about half spirits and spiritosis. Spiritosis is literally the existence of a spirit disappearing because their rumors are about to die out. The disappearance of their abstraction leads to their own disappearance. That's all the damning evidence one needs. The general definition for AE also says they're embodiments of abstractions. This topic was literally gone over when fujiwara was trying to pull her antics, saying something is an embodiment of something does not make it type 2. The use of realization in conjunction should literally clue one into that fact.
next is immortality and regeneration Immortality & Regeneration (Types 1, 3, 4 & 8 up-to High-godly; A spirit can't die as long as their rumors persist. Even if killed they shall continue to rise again as long as the rumors which form them remain. Spirits will continue to resurrect even if their source is destroyed as long as their lore remains)
Uh, so, where's the "Eternal Life" part that's supposed to be the qualifier for Type 1? This is not some bullshit where you remain as long as something else remains, at least not necessarily, and is just Type 8. Unless the supporters can provide solid proof that said "Rumors and Lore" continue to exist eternally, and iff that is always the case, the Type 1 needs to say bye-bye.
And, of course, after looking into what I said above in the Novel, I found a few related things, that is, the Spirit part of Half Spirits is indeed dependent on Rumors, Desires, and Hope, and if those are extinguished from the minds of others, the Spirit part of the Half-Spirit dies as well. The same should apply to Spirits, except that there's no "Half" part, the Spirit Physiology is their entire existence, and thus even more dependent on those rumors
How about you show where their lifespan is said to be limited? "Spirits will continue to live, rise again so long as their rumors remain", they will live forever so long as those rumors exist and even if their entire existence is destroyed they shall still come back. Rumors on the other hand continuing to exist eternally or not has nothing to do with their life span. Type 1 AE & immortal beings will still cease to exist/live if their fundamental aspect is wiped out.
Additionally, I can see Type 8 even without scans (Note on that: ADD SCANS), the wording itself says "Even if they're killed, they shall continue to rise again", yeah, that's Type 4, sure, but where is the Type 3?
You went through the blog and just so happened to miss the part that says spirits consume their source when they utilize spirit magic and the consumed portion is replenished recovered from said rumors? Besides, godly regeneration is still resurrection
Abstract Existence (Type 1; Law, Fate, Concept Type 1; Gods are order itself and nothing more, they are the absolute existence for all who live in the world, they are the laws and concepts of the world and both life and death are governed by the order)
So.... what exactly here makes them Type 1 Concepts? They govern the world, sure thing, but that's Type 2
, it doesn't show their independence from it.
One word, "Jerga". Jerga, the concept of human hatred against demons will continue to exist even if all of humanity is wiped out and he is an order second to that of the Gods in other words, his existence is below theirs.
To quote another scan itself,"If thou destroys me, the World shall be unable to maintain its current form, and it will slowly fall apart. , yeah... this doesn't sound like Type 1 at all. Without a Type 1 Concept, the objects should never exist to begin with, past, present and future (since by default, Type 1 Concepts encompass all of Time). The fact that the world would "slowly" fall apart means it won't instantly cease to exist, which makes it a problem for Order to be Type 1 to begin with.
You simply don't understand how concepts are treated on site. Unless a concept is responsible over general reality, the state of that reality has nothing to do with its classification. "Reality" in the CM page is referring to the object(s) participating under the scope of the concept. The concept of circles is type 1 if affecting it affects all circular things and it cannot be affected by affecting all circular things, it is type 2 if affecting it affects all things under it but it can similarly be affected by affecting the object it governs and it is type 3 if affecting it only affects something specific in something circular.
With that said, Nosgalia is the heavenly father God whose order governs other orders, his order is responsible for maintaining order. Killing/destroying a God only disrupts order, it doesn't destroy it. Killing Nosgalia would cause the order of order to be disrupted which in turn will cause all other orders to not be maintained. With order not being maintained and all things not functioning as they should, the world will begin to collapse. Get your facts straight.
For instance, if it was Type 1, the World would have fallen apart instantly, ceasing to exist from all of Time. Obviously, that didn't happen nor was stated here. So this has to say Bye-bye too.
Time has nothing to do with the classification of a concept neither does the amount of time it takes the object to cease. Fact remains it will cease to exist.
Immortality & Regeneration (Types 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 8 up-to High-Godly; Gods are eternal and immortal beings, can survive having their hearts destroyed and being decapitated. Can easily resurrect and regenerate their bodies after being destroyed. Gods are nothing, they're immortal and thus not living, existing solely as the logic of the world. Gods are capable of regenerating from source (concept) destruction)
Gods are not eternal, stop the wank. The description links two contradictory scans; However, given that the "They are not eternal" is from a Volume that came after the other ones, it's fine to take that scan as the more solid one, leading to Gods losing their Immortality Type 1 via the following lines:

Gods aren't eternal. They disappeared and were newly reborn according to Order, and the one who created them was this god, the Heavenly Father.
Reading comprehension problem I guess as you are unable to deduce the meaning of that sentence. "They disappeared and were newly reborn according to Order", the intention is directly in front of you, they're life span is infinite however, if order should ordain a god to die, in compliance of that, they will die as gods are orderly beings and cannot go against order. Only a few gods have ever managed to go against their order.
Nosgalia as the god responsible for birthing gods can normally only birth keepers who are merely guardians of order because that's what his own order permits. Creating more gods would only serve to disrupt order.
The fact that this scan, which was supposed to likely be for giving them Type 4, outright contradicted their Type 1, yet the scan seems to intentionally not have highlighted the "Gods aren't eternal" part, and only highlighted the thing that the characters could gain something from....
still reading comprehension leaving the chat
Of course, this is not the only reason for the removal, as at another instance, it's also outright stated that they don't even have an Infinite life span, just a really long one:

So yeah, their Type 1 goes bye-bye and Longevity enters the chat.
Not touching as this was debunked and is from a tl error
Moving on, what exactly makes them have High Godly level of Regeneration (or Resurrection) here, exactly? Stop hiding the factual scan statements behind those vague descriptions; Gods cannot generate from complete source destruction, the scan itself that's linked to that part says otherwise;

(If it weren't for Venuzdonoa, you would have easily regenerated your source. Choosing to leech off Eldmed's body and source was your mistake. Within him, you can survive with only ten percent of your source. The remaining ten percent will prevent the collapse of order."

I had destroyed his source in a way that allowed only ten percent or so to be recovered through source regeneration magic. This meant that Agronemt couldn't restore his source to its perfect state.)

So yes, they can survive with only ten percent of their source, but nothing says they can 'survive and regenerate from complete source destruction'.

And no, the "Source Regenerating Magic" would not do the trick here since its clear that said Magic is Agronemt (unless proven otherwise), which cannot even be used if the source has disappeared/been completely destroyed.

The spell normally couldn't be used by one whose source had disappeared, but I'd prepared beforehand by using Rivide to send Agronemt into the future.

Source
umm...
Additionally, to begin with, Agronemt is an Origin Magic, one restricted to usage by only Demon Royalty, Gods shouldn't be able to use it since they aren't Demon Royalty, UNLESS PROVEN OTHERWISE by the supporters.
Excuse me but what? When did gods ever use Agronemt?
Basically, the summary of the scans for their regeneration is:

If the Source of a God is completely destroyed, it will result in the World's order collapsing. Therefore, Anos only destroyed part of the source, just so much that said God (and Order) would be kept alive (and prevented from collapsing) and allow them to slowly recover their source, proving they cannot regenerate if their source is completely destroyed. Regeneration from Partial Destruction is, however, still possible.
The above summary about only a part of the source being destroyed, and the fact that they cannot regenerate from complete source destruction, is fully backed by by the same scan as the one that was used to grant it regeneration, EXCEPT, that this time, we'll actually get to see the full contents of the scan rather then a small part of it cropped for manipulating the rating:





source






If Gods could truly regenerate from Complete Source Destruction (Which itself is baffling even as a mere thought since the World cannot exist without Order (Gods), then the above (Self Destruction) wouldn't even be a problem for them either, yet it is forbidden; Why? Because the World and Order will be destroyed.




This thus negates all claimed instances of "Sources were completely destroyed", which should now be put as "It is flowery language, it is not completely destroyed", unless of course, it's proven otherwise completely, such as via the World being destroyed as a by-product.

So before someone starts yapping "Prove your summary", know and read (and don't manipulate) the very novel you yourself support first, rather then having others to read it for you. It's clear that they cannot regenerate from complete source destruction, because Anos only made it sure to break their source "just enough to allow for a slow recovery", the JUST ENOUGH by itself indicates that the source was not completely destroyed.

Additionally, stepping aside from the context of the scans being used on the page, let's look at other supporting proof that resurrecting from Complete Source Destruction is impossible (unless extremely specific conditions are met).

Destruction of Source means Death, true death, to be precise; the "Only Exception" to that fact is Hero Kanon, and even he was only an exception due to having seven sources instead of one, which allowed him to restore his other six Sources if even one of them is still left. In other words, even Kanon cannot come back from complete destruction of his source (all of them):

Hero Kanon, his holy sword in hand, was running towards them, closing a distance of approximately ten kilometers.




One cannot live if their source is destroyed. Not even Ingall would have an effect. The only exception to this was Hero Kanon. He was capable of resurrecting over and over again. The reason was simple—unlike normal people with a single source, Kanon possessed seven. As long as one of those sources remained, the remaining six could be restored.

So yeah, the HGR will say bye-bye and instead, Overtime (Because it is a "Slow Recovery") Mid Godly Regeneration (MGK MGR) should be welcomed with open hands. Because as per standards, not regenerating from complete destruction of a fundamental aspect and only partial destruction is nowhere even near High Godly levels of Regeneration.
Wtf? Kanon whose regen is fodder? Anos also made this same statement when he has Agronemt to come back from source destruction so wakanda kindergarten argument is this?
The boys are already cooking this so I'll prepare something else. Gods can regen from complete source destruction, immediately should they choose to do so even in one of tha scans used, Anos literally says the God he just killed could revive right now which is why he left Shin to protect Reno.
"Why isn't self-destruction permitted for the Gods?" Wtf? because they are orderly beings and cannot go against order. Their purpose is to maintain their order so why would they disrupt it by destroying themselves? Even contradicting orders like birth & abortion, creation & destruction do not attack each other.

In the selection trial where the selected battle against each other with their selection gods, gods who are destroyed during the trial (source and all) are not allowed to regenerate until after the trial is over meaning once it ends they will regenerate.
So it seems. The songfire spell targeting Midhaze was similar to Lanrez. It’s much stronger than when I last saw it, so the pope must have used Egred to resurrect even more followers this time.”

Gods that perish in the Selection Trial can’t be resurrected until the trial ends. Casting Egred should require the God of Gospel’s power.”

I destroyed that god already.
I continued beating Gard Aske into him—into his abdomen, into his throat, into his face. The pope flew backwards, smashing through several pillars before hitting the wall and coming to a stop. Doldread, the God of Gospel, rotted away and perished.
Additionally, nothing here suggests Type 5, so unless provided evidence, it should be removed completely as well.
Militia: Gods are immortal and thus are not even living.
They aren't undead and are clearly alive still she says they aren't living. Means life and death do not apply to them. No other immortality type suits the context and given she's the creator god whose order is also the concept of life, why da hell would life and death apply to her and she says it's the same for other gods.
Limited Invulnerability (For their source; The source (concept) of a god is indestructible even against weapons made specially to permanently kill them like Shin Reglia's <Gneodoros>)
Even if the Statistics Amplification one was not a joke (though I doubt it), this must be, because while the description says "Their source is indestructible even against weapons made specially to permanently kill them like Shin's sword", the scan proves completely otherwise;





The scans and description are so contradictory this time to each other that I can't even think of it as anything other than a joke....

And it gets even funnier if one sees the full scan... because the sheer amount of phrases that contradict the description is insane:





So here you go... contradictory, right?

Oh, and before someone starts yapping "But didn't Nosgalia revive after his source was cut?", yes, he did, but when did that mean his source was "Completely erased"? Mind you, cutting an apple in half doesn't mean the Apple is erased, it just means its turned into smaller divided parts.

This is backed up by the fact the scan also says the dividing would continue "without end, until his source cannot be divided further", in other words, an Infinitesimal small part of the original, yet still existing and
being there, not Complete destruction.
I would've made a thread for layered immortality and invulnerability if we had created more profiles for gods.
In one of the scans you chose to ignore, Shin is shown permanently killing divine hounds, the lowest ranking gods, with his sword. In volume 6 its said he could destroy a keeper.
Eldmed’s question purposely avoided the true matter at hand: that if push came to shove, Shin could always kill a Keeper of Time to shoot Ceris forward in time himself. With no idea which Shin was Shin and which was a Keeper, Ceris had no means of defending himself. Even if he did, the Conflagration King most likely had another card up his sleeve. That was what his words were implying, anyway.
Keepers are middle ranking amongst the gods. Against Gods, the hidden arts of his weapon cannot negate their immortality nor their sources invulnerability. Hidden arts unleash the true power hidden within a weapon.
Baseline immortality (divine hounds. Killed by base Gneodoros)< keepers immortality (requires hidden arts to kill) < Gods immortality (cannot be killed even by Gneodoros hidden arts).
A source simply by being cut will be destroyed (on the same blog) those with CM resistance survive but a Gods source cannot be destroyed because it is indestructible. Gneodoros hidden arts still cutting it means nothing as it still didn't destroy him.
That's it Merry Christmas and Advance Happy New Year
same to you
If Gods can regenerate from their source, why is self-destruction not an option? That leads me to believe that they cannot do so, at least by themselves. If they can regenerate from their complete source destruction, Anos also has no reason to break them enough just enough to allow a slow recovery.
Wtf? because they are orderly beings and cannot go against order. Their purpose is to maintain their order so why would they disrupt it by destroying themselves? Even contradicting orders like birth & abortion, creation & destruction do not attack each other.
 
Seems like the boys are already handling this well but I'll go over everything.

It seems some people just do not know how not to contradict themselves. Right below this, you posted scans and talked about half spirits and spiritosis. Spiritosis is literally the existence of a spirit disappearing because their rumors are about to die out. The disappearance of their abstraction leads to their own disappearance. That's all the damning evidence one needs. The general definition for AE also says they're embodiments of abstractions. This topic was literally gone over when fujiwara was trying to pull her antics, saying something is an embodiment of something does not make it type 2. The use of realization in conjunction should literally clue one into that fact.

How about you show where their lifespan is said to be limited? "Spirits will continue to live, rise again so long as their rumors remain", they will live forever so long as those rumors exist and even if their entire existence is destroyed they shall still come back. Rumors on the other hand continuing to exist eternally or not has nothing to do with their life span. Type 1 AE & immortal beings will still cease to exist/live if their fundamental aspect is wiped out.

You went through the blog and just so happened to miss the part that says spirits consume their source when they utilize spirit magic and the consumed portion is replenished recovered from said rumors? Besides, godly regeneration is still resurrection

One word, "Jerga". Jerga, the concept of human hatred against demons will continue to exist even if all of humanity is wiped out and he is an order second to that of the Gods in other words, his existence is below theirs.

You simply don't understand how concepts are treated on site. Unless a concept is responsible over general reality, the state of that reality has nothing to do with its classification. "Reality" in the CM page is referring to the object(s) participating under the scope of the concept. The concept of circles is type 1 if affecting it affects all circular things and it cannot be affected by affecting all circular things, it is type 2 if affecting it affects all things under it but it can similarly be affected by affecting the object it governs and it is type 3 if affecting it only affects something specific in something circular.
With that said, Nosgalia is the heavenly father God whose order governs other orders, his order is responsible for maintaining order. Killing/destroying a God only disrupts order, it doesn't destroy it. Killing Nosgalia would cause the order of order to be disrupted which in turn will cause all other orders to not be maintained. With order not being maintained and all things not functioning as they should, the world will begin to collapse. Get your facts straight.

Time has nothing to do with the classification of a concept neither does the amount of time it takes the object to cease. Fact remains it will cease to exist.

Reading comprehension problem I guess as you are unable to deduce the meaning of that sentence. "They disappeared and were newly reborn according to Order", the intention is directly in front of you, they're life span is infinite however, if order should ordain a god to die, in compliance of that, they will die as gods are orderly beings and cannot go against order. Only a few gods have ever managed to go against their order.
Nosgalia as the god responsible for birthing gods can normally only birth keepers who are merely guardians of order because that's what his own order permits. Creating more gods would only serve to disrupt order.

still reading comprehension leaving the chat

Not touching as this was debunked and is from a tl error

umm...

Excuse me but what? When did gods ever use Agronemt?

Wtf? Kanon whose regen is fodder? Anos also made this same statement when he has Agronemt to come back from source destruction so wakanda kindergarten argument is this?
The boys are already cooking this so I'll prepare something else. Gods can regen from complete source destruction, immediately should they choose to do so even in one of tha scans used, Anos literally says the God he just killed could revive right now which is why he left Shin to protect Reno.
"Why isn't self-destruction permitted for the Gods?" Wtf? because they are orderly beings and cannot go against order. Their purpose is to maintain their order so why would they disrupt it by destroying themselves? Even contradicting orders like birth & abortion, creation & destruction do not attack each other.

In the selection trial where the selected battle against each other with their selection gods, gods who are destroyed during the trial (source and all) are not allowed to regenerate until after the trial is over meaning once it ends they will regenerate.



Militia: Gods are immortal and thus are not even living.
They aren't undead and are clearly alive still she says they aren't living. Means life and death do not apply to them. No other immortality type suits the context and given she's the creator god whose order is also the concept of life, why da hell would life and death apply to her and she says it's the same for other gods.

I would've made a thread for layered immortality and invulnerability if we had created more profiles for gods.
In one of the scans you chose to ignore, Shin is shown permanently killing divine hounds, the lowest ranking gods, with his sword. In volume 6 its said he could destroy a keeper.

Keepers are middle ranking amongst the gods. Against Gods, the hidden arts of his weapon cannot negate their immortality nor their sources invulnerability. Hidden arts unleash the true power hidden within a weapon.
Baseline immortality (divine hounds. Killed by base Gneodoros)< keepers immortality (requires hidden arts to kill) < Gods immortality (cannot be killed even by Gneodoros hidden arts).
A source simply by being cut will be destroyed (on the same blog) those with CM resistance survive but a Gods source cannot be destroyed because it is indestructible. Gneodoros hidden arts still cutting it means nothing as it still didn't destroy him.

same to you

Wtf? because they are orderly beings and cannot go against order. Their purpose is to maintain their order so why would they disrupt it by destroying themselves? Even contradicting orders like birth & abortion, creation & destruction do not attack each other.
Bro made my debunk look like a child's play, anyway, I take this as you disagree with the thread as whole.

So since OP haven't update the tally, Can someone make the tally in the comments?
 
Disagree: Me, Satoshi, Dog, Dereck, Tatsumi, Elde, Rozan, Wesker, (I think) Vietthai, DarkDragonMedeus, BreezeHM, Eseseso (switched to disagreeing with the op after reading the rebuttal from Dereck)


Not sure what to put for: Alipheese, DarkSoul, Deceived

Agree: AstralTrinity, Robo, TempestDragon, EikichiSensei


If anyone else wants to bother to correct me.. then aye, better say so, did it off the top of my head and I'm tired right now.. 😭
 
Last edited:
Only exception to Humans, not gods, satoshi addressed this already.
Sure, the statement was in a chapter talking about humans, but Anos never said the only exception rule only applied to humans. That argument seems a bit shaky considering it was talking about Anos and Kanon fighting in the ancient era 2000 years ago, the same era when Anos used to destroy a ton of normal Gods.
Dude, how many times do I have to tell you? Venuzdonoa negated Nosgalia's regen, if Anos had destroyed his source with Vebdoz, he would have regenerated, but when he did it with Venuzdonoa he said that Nosgalia would have regenerated its source if Venuzdonoa had not destroyed it, which means that if Anos had not revived it with Agronemt, Nosgalia would have been permanently destroyed because of Venuzdonoa.
Except, sure, Vebzud is a source destroying magic, but what guarantees that it can destroy a god;s source completely when Gods have an exceptional, aka infinite, source? What says it can destroy their source completely when even a God-slaying sword from Shin could only cut their source tiII an infiniteIy smaII part is Ieft? There are so many things here that need be proven.
They would have regenerated if it was not Venuzdnoa because then their source would not have been destroyed completely to begin with. That case is cIear from the Shin vs Nosgalia fight.
And nah, Anos did not use Venuzdonoa to leave 10% of Nosgalia' source, Anos destroyed it completely that is seen because the world is about to be destroyed, if he had not destroyed it completely and only left 10% the world would not have suffered that,
I never said Anos did not destroy it, I said he regenerated it himseIf after he destroyed it with Venuzdnoa. That I IiteraIIy confirmed at the end of my comment:
but in the first case with Venuzdnoa, it destroyed him tiII nothing remained, thus why he couId not regenerate at aII, triggering the destruction of the world:
Anos regenerated the source to 10% of its current power, so Nosgalia would not continue attacking the students and allowing him to recover slowly as the world continued to depend on Nosgalia.
That does not even go against anything what I said.
My point was that Venuzdnoa did not destroy them in a way that they cannot regenerate at all, the only such statement was that it prevented them from regenerating beyond 10 percent of their source. If Gods could regenerate from complete source destruction, that means they should be able to regenerate at Ieast that 10 percent by themselves after being reduced to nothingness. Which Nosgalia did not, Anos had to do it himself via Agronemt.
Addressed.
Not really, other then misunderstanding my whole point, you did not address anything that was actuaIIy my point, as expIained above.
Nah, we even see that the god of traces had his source destroyed and yet Anos said it was a temporary solution and that he would return and that god is one of a lower category than Nosgalia. So yeah, they can regenerate.
God of traces is a unique case since his immortaIity is indepedent on the Iand of traces:
A black snake mark appeared on Revalschned’s body, rampaging fiercely as ittried to consume him. It was a curse that caused one’s magic to fly out ofcontrol, driving the subject to death. Just as expected, the god’s magic ran wild,rapidly decaying his body. I grabbed the magic circle with my right arm and forcefully yanked it out of his body along with his source.

Once his source was out of his body, I crushed it in my hand. The God of Traces’ body immediately rotted away, turning into air.

Of course, it was only a temporary solution. He wouldn’t die just from that.
“I’ve witnessed the whole scheme now. In order to destroy you, I have to destroy the land of traces first,” I said.
That would also explain why the god of traces would recover just Iike that when regeneration from even partial destruction of source, aka the source being torn/cut but not erased, is difficuIt for a normal God
“The light of restoration heals wounds.
”Arcana tried to use the Keeper of Restoration’s power, but the wounds shehad received were slow to heal.“
To be more precise, Nojiaz consumes the source. Even a god will struggle to recover when their source has been torn into.
”Consuming the source, huh? It almost sounded like a dragon’s womb. But he hadn’t shown any sign of using Azept.
Before you say, its not an exception, this would Iike to say otherwise:
“You godless fool! You think you can destroy god?! That’s sacrilege! This god isn’t the same as a keeper! Your mortal self cannot destroy my Selection God, the symbol of holiness itself, without the power of another deity!”
With my mauve Magic Eyes, I gazed at the god within him and clenched my hand, squeezing the source in my palm. The tremendous magic surrounding Gazel disappeared.
“What...? The power of my god...disappeared... My god is fading... That can’t be. Stop! Stop it! Stop it right now, you heretic!”
I crushed the source of the god completely. Its power vanished without a trace.
“Ah... Ah... My deity... The symbol of holiness... Aaaaaah!”
I picked up the Divine Spear that had fallen to the floor and crushed that too, destroying Beheus, God of Piercing.
“It’s gone... My deity... My god... How...?”
“Holy knight crawling on the ground, it’s my turn to teach you.” I looked down at Gazel, who was kneeling with a lifeless look in his eyes.
“This is how the Demon King of the surface fights without relying on a god.”
Anos was obviously not using venuzdnoa here, he did it with his bare hand, crushing his source completely, directly, and the God, who should have regenerated according to how you treat them, never did so.
In fact, even Arcana, who could recover from partial source destruction by using the light of restoration, described her soon-to-happen complete source destruction as a salvation for herself:
Arcana gripped the sheath in her left hand and held the hilt in her right.
“But I was wrong. That’s why this defeat at your hands is punishment for my sins, and above all, it is my salvation.”
She clenched her right hand.
“Goodbye. May you emerge victorious.” Quietly, she mustered her strength and moved to draw Levyngilma.
However, before the Sword of the Almighty could erase her source, I grabbed her right hand and stopped her. Arcana looked at me curiously.
AND WHY IGNORE THIS?
And let me get ahead of you as I foresee your nitpick saying that Anos did not destroy his source but Aske, we have this scan, by Anos destroying Aske with vebdoz, he would be destroying the source, the pure concept of Jerga, but this one is able to regenerate after that, since Vebdoz is for destroying sources specifically.
Except, according to your own scan, Anos said So your source cannot be touched, so him destroying Aske is contradictory, and so is him destroying Jerga;s source. In fact, its cIearIy shown that Anos destroyed the Aske-formed body, but did that effect aske itseIf? Nope, Aske was just chiIIing in the sky:
With that, I crushed his Aske-formed body with my source-destroying fingertips.
Light scattered as his form dispersed into mist, but more light from Azesion fell from the sky, reforming Jerga’s body.“
Hmm. So your source can’t be touched.”
“Then you understand. This body of mine is made up of Jerga magic—afragment of this world’s order that cannot be destroyed.”
So this wouldn’t be as easy, then. That was no surprise.
“Time is up,” Jerga said, before calling to the people through Aske. His voice echoed in the hearts of everyone affected by the spell.
“Hear me, citizens of Azesion. The deepest darkness has engulfed the continent of Azesion. After two thousand years, the Demon King of Tyranny has returned to this land. But fear not. Pray with hope—pray for our legendary Hero. His return shall once more be the light that banishes the darkness.”
When Diego had said he’d sown the seeds two thousand years ago, he had probably been referring to this very legend—a legend that had been passed down through the ever-increasing human population.
The light of Aske in the sky glowed brighter than the sun itself. Its radiance was being siphoned from all across Azesion.
In fact, the act of Iight faIIing from the sky, aka from Aske in the sky, proves that Aske itseIf was not destroyed at that moment, onIy the body that was formed from its Iight, aka the aske-formed body, was.
But why should they self-destruct? They go according to order so that is not an option, but in case they are destroyed by someone else, they are able to regenerate, bruh.
Stop trying to find the fifth leg of the cat. I'm just going to ignore your argument if so.
Ignoring the whole point of the argument again. Self-destruction can be done to destroy the enemy in the surrounding area, but Gods cannot do it. Because if their source was destroyed via seIf-destruction, it wouId no Ionger remain and order would be destroyed. So order makes that ruIe as a safety measure to make sure nothing happens to it, simpIe as that. Thats the simpIe scenario one can deduce from the why does that ruIe exist?

Your argument addresses that they cannot seIf-destruct because its a ruIe, but it does not answer why that ruIe exists, nor can it in that way negate the hypotheticaI reason I presented.
 
Didn't knew Nosgalia being addressed as her before 😭.

Beside everything is already been refuted by dereck.
Please re-read again. He just says it's because of the sword, but Nosgalia says they can't destroy it because the world would fall apart, then he gets angry because Anos controls the goddess's power (Negation his regeneration). Plus the incredible lack of context there is.

Also, why are they so sure that Nostalgia can fully return after its destruction, if Nosgalia himself got angry that Anos could control the power of the goddess (Negation his regeneration). He didn't even know that he could control her power anymore. So it's strange that they keep claiming that she regenerates even if her source is completely destroyed.

 
If I had a nickel for everytime source destruction was to be done to a god and they were able to regenerate in series not being completely destroyed as a whole (order), I'd probably be a millionaire.

But this repeating and forcefully going in circles is not letting the nickels flow.
 
Wtf? because they are orderly beings and cannot go against order. Their purpose is to maintain their order so why would they disrupt it by destroying themselves? Even contradicting orders like birth & abortion, creation & destruction do not attack each other.
Ignoring the whole point of the argument again. Self-destruction can be done to destroy the enemy in the surrounding area, but Gods cannot do it. Because if their source was destroyed via seIf-destruction, it wouId no Ionger remain and order would be destroyed. So order makes that ruIe as a safety measure to make sure nothing happens to it, simpIe as that. Thats the simpIe scenario one can deduce from the why does that ruIe exist?

Your argument addresses that they cannot seIf-destruct because its a ruIe, but it does not answer why that ruIe exists, nor can it in that way negate the hypotheticaI reason I presented.
 
now hold on a second guys, i'm a neutral guy but what??, why are we using the argument that: this guy don't self-destruct, thus his regen if false??, if i'm not wrong, your argument is in order to prove characters have regen, they need to self-destruct and regen themselves to prove that have regen??, like seriously, what kind of argument is that
 
what forms the spirit is the very lore of origin
The scan says they are born from it, not that they are the Iore itseIf as an abstraction.
and how they remain as lore even if source is destroyed and reform their source
ZdIHgSL.png
This is simpIy reIiant immortaIity, the same as how an embodiment of an abstraction can regenerate/resurrect as Iong as the abstraction itseIf exists, that is IiteraIIy the definition of type 2 AE. Nothing says they exist as the Iore in abstract form, bruh.
end of the lore = their end , or going against the lore = their end
the great war ended so the lore of a great war tree who helped human in great war also ended , so the tree ceased to exist

8XioKB3.png
Which in fact proves that the Iores/rumors are not eternaI, thus removing the whole spirits are type 1 immortaI and backs up my argument regarding that.
even spirit's can die referring to the fact that their lore is being eaten
m4BFGP2.png
Which is nothing exceptionaI for a type 2 abstract. They are reIiant on the abstraction, so of course, destroying the abstraction wiII kiII the embodiment as weII.
so they are the lore itself ,which is their abstraction
Not reaIIy. Your concIusion does not follow the premise of the scans, which just show the reIiancy of a spirit, the embodiment, to the Iore, the abstraction.
legend and rumors are the continuation of the origin lore , which can change as they spreads
like a spirit born from the lore of it being longest snake , it rumors got so exaggerated that it became able to wrap the world 333 times
RcbACwc.png
Yeah, which just proves my point. The snake is the physicaI embodiment, the Iore is the thoughts/rumors that exist in the mind. The abstraction is a mentaI thing, existing as rumors/Iegends in the hearts and minds of peopIe, but the spirits are the physicaI form that exist in the worId.

So far, aII the scans you sent just enhance the fact that they are the embodiment and reIiant on the abstraction, not the abstraction itseIf.
 
now hold on a second guys, i'm a neutral guy but what??, why are we using the argument that: this guy don't self-destruct, thus his regen if false??, if i'm not wrong, your argument is in order to prove characters have regen, they need to self-destruct and regen themselves to prove that have regen??, like seriously, what kind of argument is that
non-points out the wazoo I guess
 
Before you say, its not an exception, this would Iike to say otherwise:

Anos was obviously not using venuzdnoa here, he did it with his bare hand, crushing his source completely, directly, and the God, who should have regenerated according to how you treat them, never did so.
In fact, even Arcana, who could recover from partial source destruction by using the light of restoration, described her soon-to-happen complete source destruction as a salvation for herself:



Except, according to your own scan, Anos said So your source cannot be touched, so him destroying Aske is contradictory, and so is him destroying Jerga;s source. In fact, its cIearIy shown that Anos destroyed the Aske-formed body, but did that effect aske itseIf? Nope, Aske was just chiIIing in the sky:

In fact, the act of Iight faIIing from the sky, aka from Aske in the sky, proves that Aske itseIf was not destroyed at that moment, onIy the body that was formed from its Iight, aka the aske-formed body, was.

Ignoring the whole point of the argument again. Self-destruction can be done to destroy the enemy in the surrounding area, but Gods cannot do it. Because if their source was destroyed via seIf-destruction, it wouId no Ionger remain and order would be destroyed. So order makes that ruIe as a safety measure to make sure nothing happens to it, simpIe as that. Thats the simpIe scenario one can deduce from the why does that ruIe exist?

Your argument addresses that they cannot seIf-destruct because its a ruIe, but it does not answer why that ruIe exists, nor can it in that way negate the hypotheticaI reason I presented.
Read the scan properly. Anos destroyed them while his Mauve eyes are active.
“You godless fool! You think you can destroy god?! That’s sacrilege! This god isn’t the same as a keeper! Your mortal self cannot destroy my Selection God, the symbol of holiness itself, without the power of another deity!”

With my mauve Magic Eyes, I gazed at the god within him and clenched my hand, squeezing the source in my palm. The tremendous magic surrounding Gazel disappeared.

“What...? The power of my god...disappeared... My god is fading... That can’t be. Stop! Stop it! Stop it right now, you heretic!”

I crushed the source of the god completely. Its power vanished without a trace.

“Ah... Ah... My deity... The symbol of holiness... Aaaaaah!” I picked up the Divine Spear that had fallen to the floor and crushed that too, destroying Beheus, God of Piercing.

“It’s gone... My deity... My god... How...?”

“Holy knight crawling on the ground, it’s my turn to teach you.” I looked down at Gazel, who was kneeling with a lifeless look in his eyes.

“This is how the Demon King of the surface fights without relying on God"
And Mauve magic eyes can negate the gods power.

“Hmm. The Sword of the Almighty appears to be real, at least,” I said.



Ahid glared at me, clenching his hand around the broken sword of snow.



Arcana, meanwhile, gazed into my mauve Magic Eyes.



“ The Sword of Divine Snow had no effect because of his Magic Eyes. Though they resemble the Magic Eyes of Destruction, they are not the same. They are the reason the undestroyable god was reduced to nothing.”



“You sure are looking deep into my abyss. Why don’t you just take his place rather than sending him messages? No matter how much power you give him, he’s no match if he doesn’t know how to use it.”
 
Last edited:
now hold on a second guys, i'm a neutral guy but what??, why are we using the argument that: this guy don't self-destruct, thus his regen if false??, if i'm not wrong, your argument is in order to prove characters have regen, they need to self-destruct and regen themselves to prove that have regen??, like seriously, what kind of argument is that
Its basicaIIy, Iets say, a guy can instantIy regenerate from having his physicaI body destroyed. Then he is facing a strong enemy and is in an extremeIy dire situation, and he can defeat it by seIf-destructing and reIeasing a tons shit of energy/expIosion/whatever. Why would he not seIf-destruct knowing he can just come back from said seIf-destruction?
The onIy way to expIain it is that he cannot instantIy regenerate from seIf-destruction to begin with!
 
Its basicaIIy, Iets say, a guy can instantIy regenerate from having his physicaI body destroyed. Then he is facing a strong enemy and is in an extremeIy dire situation, and he can defeat it by seIf-destructing and reIeasing a tons shit of energy/expIosion/whatever. Why would he not seIf-destruct knowing he can just come back from said seIf-destruction?
The onIy way to expIain it is that he cannot instantIy regenerate from seIf-destruction to begin with!
the fact you are bringing up this like it's an actual point against those who disagree is something everybody should be asking 'why' about, actually... this is so bad
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top