Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is incorrect for a multidude of reasons that both Planck and Ultima already explained. You dont even need a 2-A cosmology in this case.As for why it is not tier 1, we do not give tier 1 for simply having a timeline of 12-18 universes. That's only 2-C. Tier 1 comes at a level of infinity that goes beyond uncountable infinite number of Low 2-C structures, i.e. 2-A. There are no infinite number of 2-A multiverses here.
I see your still refusing to refute huh? If this rejected soooo many times and it’s soooo wrong. Why can’t you easily debunk it?What? Why would any new arguments be presented for information from the Daizenshuu that is old and brings nothing new to the table. And yes, I am still against the universes being infinite and 2-C due to the same reasons. Please drop this topic. A universe is not 2-C and nobody is getting infinite speed.
I’m not wasting my time reading old threads with old opinions. You agree with low 2-C in those thread so they’re outdated. Stop flashing your incompetence and please properly refute my arguments. The entire point of this thread is to have a fresh new understanding of the cosmology. Pretend those old threads don’t exist. I don’t have all day for you to say the same thing over and over again with no basis whatsoever.Please see the old threads for why the above notion is wrong. As for why it is not tier 1, we do not give tier 1 for simply having a timeline of 12-18 universes. That's only 2-C. Tier 1 comes at a level of infinity that goes beyond uncountable infinite number of Low 2-C structures, i.e. 2-A. There are no infinite number of 2-A multiverses here.
You know what, maybe I should cut you some slack, you are sick after all. So I won’t blame you if you make more illogical claims.Because that's all what's required for a CRT of this level. Idk why this isn't in Fun and Games, honestly.
^Pardon the intrusion, but I think what Kukui said is right about the Low 1-C stuff. No in between.
Same with Zamasu
And Planck already explained it more than one time
Not to mention aside from DDM no one actually read the points in the blog
Well, a downgrade to 3-A seems very excessive to me.Not going to respond anymore after this, but this needs to be reiterated. People need to stop looking to old threads as a means of trying to automatically reject this, the upgrade has a new basis to be discussed. 2-C isn't possible anymore under these circumstances. It's either the verse gets downgraded to 3-A for the universes being shared space-times, or they are separate space-times and it brings the verse to Low 1-C.
Pick one or the other, and defend the choice you pick.
There's a very simple answer to this question. Because it's already been done so many times. And that's why a discussion rule exists.I see your still refusing to refute huh? If this rejected soooo many times and it’s soooo wrong. Why can’t you easily debunk it?
Which brings me to this. You can't expect other people to waste their time when all you do is bring up old information and warp it to create a "new" outlook.I’m not wasting my time reading old threads with old opinions.
Yes, but AKM seems to be invested in the topic. I don't want to run him over, especially when he is sick.Ant, the other staff have good enough judgement to make decisions on this thread...
Oh to just clarify, im not saying the verse should be downgraded, but rather, people who disagree with Low 1-C would need to downgrade the verse to 3-A as that would be the only way to actually disagree with the upgrades.Well, a downgrade to 3-A seems very excessive to me.
^You can disagree with 2-C universes, and the infinite speed part, but the Low 1-C upgrade is irrefutable if you agree that each universe is at least Low 2-C.
It is pretty hard to keep civil in this thread cause you know, i'm not trying to be a jerk but because AKM using word like cherry-picking and wank to refute the thread, even though DDM mostly refuse he give a reasonable thing with his commentA small reminder to everyone to keep this civil.
i know i'm not a staff and you could ban me for this but let me be blunt Ant, he sick and you close this thread, and then tell me when he get well again and you unlock the thread, or the thread being ignored, people forget it and fading into darkness and pretend this never happendAgain, AKM is very sick right now. We should close this thread for a week or so and continue when he feels better. I definitely don't want him to overstrain himself.
In short, yes I disagree with 2-C and infinite speed because nothing new is brought here. And as for the latter, I don't think that's enough for the cosmology to be anywhere in tier 1, tier 1 requires a lot more than just "12 universes in a timeline" as I already pointed out.You can disagree with 2-C universes, and the infinite speed part, but the Low 1-C upgrade is irrefutable if you agree that each universe is at least Low 2-C.
All you did was drop three fat fallacies AKM.There's a very simple answer to this question. Because it's already been done so many times. And that's why a discussion rule exists.
Which brings me to this. You can't expect other people to waste their time when all you do is bring up old information and warp it to create a "new" outlook.
Discussion rules exist for a reason, especially to avoid cases like these where people are so hellbent on not giving up that they will keep brining up old and discussed material and make it a battle of attrition to force their revisions. Because they can tire out the opposing party by demanding exhausting threads one after another forcing them to discuss the same thing. As per the rule, I have half a mind to simply close this thread because you are not dropping the topic.
Drop it, or this thread gets closed.
What more is missing from the thread's reasoning for Tier 1 if I may ask?In short, yes I disagree with 2-C and infinite speed because nothing new is brought here. And as for the latter, I don't think that's enough for the cosmology to be anywhere in tier 1, tier 1 requires a lot more than just "12 universes in a timeline" as I already pointed out.
timeline encompassing timelines, 3 spatial dimensions + 2 temporal dimensions, Low 1-C.tier 1 requires a lot more than just "12 universes in a timeline" as I already pointed out.
?Can anyone answer my question?
He asked why you used the WoV stuff if you already pointed out that it's a mis translation
^^^^^^^I do have to ask one thing
@Zamasu_Chan why are you using the infinite void thing for The World of Void when you admit in the same line it’s a mistranslation? Is there any point in putting that in the blog?
I didn’t want people to question why it wasn’t in there.^^^^^^^
Question.
Is the first point that the separate universes are different space times?
I just need clarification before I answer.
Yes.Question.
Is the first point that the separate universes are different space times?
I just need clarification before I answer.
Yeah, that's in the blog.I'm not staff so I'm only gonna say this. Fu's new universe being stated a legitimate space-time multiple times should be enough proof for atleast Heroes that universes are indeed separate space-times.