- 8,382
- 1,750
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I´m sure we do, it´s just unquantificable and so "ignored" by default, which is a bit different, but it leads to basically the same result, so...Dragonmasterxyz said:From Ever;
"(...)We don't rate destroying space-time on a less than universal scale as Tier 2. Destroying planets, even if they have separate flows of time, is still just destroying planets."
This. It doesn't matter if the worlds have different times.Dragonmasterxyz said:>Says he's sure we do.
>Immediately noted that we don't by default.
If we don't we don't. We don't give someone a Tier 2 rating for destroying space time on a less than universal scale.
Ever and I disagree with the 3-A scaling to everyone.Bobsican said:What about this?Bobsican said:There´s also the 3-A stuff everyone already scales to, if we slap the time thing to it, yeah, at least the Low 2-C rating could be achieved.
Not exactly what I meant, I guess I´ll have to explain:DarkDragonMedeus said:Something about "Transcending Time" iirc, but the statement sounds too vague.
I can see that now that you mention it...ShadowWarrior1999 said:Uh, that doesn't prove the space-time continuum was going to be destroyed.
He also meantions "World" a bit earlier oDragonmasterxyz said:No it doesn't. Xehanort's statements in terms of KH would have meant everything. The world in this context would be universe unlike the word "world" in the other things we noted.
Quoting for emphasisBobsican said:But also implies that all the timelines will be merged into a single one, which is tier 2 as far I´m aware. (note that "Worlds" having their own time axis was accepted, combine that with the current 3-A reasoning and Low 2-C isn´t that far...)
Also, wasn´t the World of Light denied being an universe by our standards or something like that?
1 & 2: Matt actually tried to take the cosmology explanation in the KH Manga (which has been already stated to not be canon), which takes "Worlds" as simply pocket dimensions, or something like that.Imaginym said:Apologies.... Which Pocket Dimension is this referring to? Also, what is Matt's "arguably headcanon based on an explicitly non canon derivative work at face value"?
Even if the pocket reality stuff is denied, it still leads to tier 2 obviously, either Low 2-C or 2-B depending on how this goes, once again.Bobsican said:By the way, according to the Pocket Reality Manipulation page:
"If the pocket reality is of comparable size to a universe, and has its own timeline, this would simply be a Low 2-C feat according to the tiering system."
- Universe sized per the accepted 3-A stuff? Check
- Accepted to have timeline? - Check
If we go and accept Matt´s arguably headcanon based on an explicitly non canon derivative work at face value, Low 2-C should still be obtained in the end anyways.