- 825
- 109
I'm talking about the Manga, and he didn't even show it being referred to as a planet or anything in that scan. I explained to you the meaning of the text, this is very straightforward.Dragonmasterxyz said:
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Kingdom Hearts Series: The Tier 2 stuff
- Thread starter Bobsican
- Start date
- Status
- 32,343
- 20,268
Because it is referred and shown to be a planet elsewhere. There's nothing to argue, it's simple.
You're just ignoring context at this point.
You're just ignoring context at this point.
- 825
- 109
That quite literally is only refering to the planet Sora and co visit, not worlds=planets. It's being metaphorical. And hold on, if you want to use that scan to try and prove them only being planets, whatever is inside the world IS THE WORLD.
- 825
- 109
I explained to you why this is metaphorical. I didn't ignore context, I acknowledged it but said the interpretation is in the way I told you. Telling me this isn't contributing anything Matt.Matthew Schroeder said:
- 825
- 109
Proof on the world thing btw
https://media.discordapp.net/attach...shot_20190605-154238.jpg?width=248&height=406
https://media.discordapp.net/attach...shot_20190605-154238.jpg?width=248&height=406
- 33,405
- 8,417
Well for one thing, the Castle Oblivion feat was rejected iirc and I am sure we have no evidence of those being real stars.
- 32,343
- 20,268
You didn't explain a thing, you just claimed it without providing citations. You haven't done it at all.
- 825
- 109
Where did it get rejected? Also, why do we assume otherwise? Castle Oblivion has a statement of infinite size regardless from what I can remember.
- 32,343
- 20,268
It was never accepted. Infinite is just a hyperbole.
- 33,405
- 8,417
Also from Ever regarding said feat.
"Marluxia's 4-A "feat" was debunked months ago. Vague sparkling white lights in the background =/= stars, especially when they blink in and out and move at incredibly rapid speeds."
"Marluxia's 4-A "feat" was debunked months ago. Vague sparkling white lights in the background =/= stars, especially when they blink in and out and move at incredibly rapid speeds."
- 825
- 109
Matt, I explained why this is metaphoric, you're asking me to prove a negative at this point.
- 825
- 109
Do you have any reason? It's literally stated MFTL+ characters couldn't even clear all of the floors of Castle Oblivion.Matthew Schroeder said:
- 825
- 109
Doesn't dismiss the Terranort feat regardless.Dragonmasterxyz said:
- 33,405
- 8,417
So each world contain the heart of the world. I mean...that doesn't mean the worlds are universes. The Planet is the World and the heart of said world is located in the planet. We've seen this. The door to the heart of the world is in the planet. Nothing contradicts it being a planet.
- 32,343
- 20,268
Because of the castle's magical properties not because it is physically that big. Also MFTL+ Flight feats didn't exist in Chains of Memories when that game was written.
And I still haven't seen any explanation. You just say things without proof or reason.
It's simply, all I'm asking is [Citation Needed]
And I still haven't seen any explanation. You just say things without proof or reason.
It's simply, all I'm asking is [Citation Needed]
- 825
- 109
I've made my stance clear. This is getting very frustrating to continue doing this when one of the mods continues to label everything I say as wrong. Anyone else wants to argue on the thread, they can, I'm out.
- 33,405
- 8,417
This starry sky stuff reminds me that the Hades feat from Kid Icarus doesn't look legit.
- 825
- 109
I was fine with Dragon's replies but it's annoying when everything else I say is either a headcanon or "just wrong" when I reply to Matt. Would like to but no thanks.Bobsican said:
- 32,343
- 20,268
muh starry sky can get wanked a lot in cases where it ain't consistent
- 12,523
- 3,490
I agree with Dragon and Matt. I'm just not seeing 2-B when worlds being referred to as planets completely goes against that notion.
Bobsican
He/Him- 21,387
- 6,142
- Thread starter
- #144
If everything gets rejected, nope.MYHERO said:
But there´s still the Sleeping Worlds stuff that hasn´t been respectively debunked (as everyone agreed on Riku´s statement being reliable into the "normal" Worlds also having their own flow of time), and it´s to be noted that there are more votes in favor of the upgrade than against.
- 33,405
- 8,417
Once again, having a different time flow doesn't prove that they are different universes.
- 33,405
- 8,417
You are missing size for one thing. Being a universe has nothing to do with time flow. There is a reason as to why 3-A exists and why Universe level = Destroying all matter in the universe.
- 32,343
- 20,268
Space-Time on a universal scale.
- 32,343
- 20,268
nah dawgMYHERO said:
- 12,523
- 3,490
@Bobiscan Different flows of time can just be space-time behaving erratically in some areas.
@MYHERO Where do you even get Low 2-C from?
@MYHERO Where do you even get Low 2-C from?
Bobsican
He/Him- 21,387
- 6,142
- Thread starter
- #155
Not exactly, it ended up as while I was writing the OP to just be either 2-C or more likely 2-B if the "Worlds" were accepted as universes, rather than Low 2-C, I was not actually developing the proof (or rather the scans to be exact) when I told you, hence the variation.MYHERO said:
- 1,280
- 1,123
I want to see the supposed scan where it is stated that worlds exist on their own time axes. If it is legit, then I can see 2-C/2-B being acceptable, even with the worlds simply being planet-sized.
- Status
