• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Jubileus and Aesir upgrade?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, the only reason the merging feat in DMC was accepted as Possibly Low 2-C was because of evidence that both the time and space of the dimensions were being affected. I think what Kep is saying is that they are still within the same space-time continuum, and that only the space is being affected, which is just very far beyond baseline 3-A. As far as I understand, the fact that affecting space-only across the same time-space continuum in a merging feat is just 3-A, however, evidence that they are in different time-space continuum's or that the merging would affect both space and time would upgrade the feat to Low 2-C.
 
The later is the case here, as both Aesir and full power Jubileus has the power to completely recreate space-time
 
I see. Kepe seemed to be doubtful, so I think we should get his response.
 
Kepekley23 said:
Yeah, Aesir is very likely Low 2-C, but because of another feat entirely - the fact that he implied he'd reset space and time. The feat in the OP, however, is just 3-A.
 
Ah, I see. I've misunderstood.
 
well he had two posts that contradict each other so I wanna hear the direct opinion
 
I think this thread should be closed until Weekly's thread, considering the feat proposed isn't Low 2-C, only 3-A, and the Low 2-C feat worth of discussion will be almost certainly more controversial.
 
This is the thread for the actual Low 2-C feat, i already discussed it earlier in the thread and everyone agreed
 
It already has, the destruction and recreation of space-time that both me and Kep already brought up
 
so if jubileus at full power were to be upped to low 2-C would her weakend form stay at high 4-C? because its implied that jubileus would be able to merge the majority of the trinity but not entirly so would that put her weakend at somewhere between 3-C - possibly 3-A?
 
So, as I'm not really filled in on Bayonetta's lore, who would this Low 2-C feat scale to in-verse?
 
As of right now it would only scale to Aesir, Full power Jubileus, and Full Power Sheba, but im going to be making a thread soon that would give scaling to end game bayonetta 2 Bayonetta and full power Rodin
 
jubileus because her feat is the one were discussing, aesir because he created the eyes and is said of being capable of pulling off the same feat and is potentally stronger than jubileus, and Queen Sheba because shes considered jubileus' equal
 
WeeklyBattles said:
As of right now it would only scale to Aesir, Full power Jubileus, and Full Power Sheba, but im going to be making a thread soon that would give scaling to end game bayonetta 2 Bayonetta and full power Rodi
Interesting, I would like to see how Bayo would scale to this, good luck with the CRT
 
well considering bayo did hold her own against aesir and was able to harm him it is possible to scale the two and because the in game lore says a holder of one of the eyes of the world would be granted the power of creation and could change history. Plus when you think about it when bayo held her own against aesir she didnt have the left eye but I dont know if holding you own against a potentally low 2-C character would count as a low 2-C feat
 
WeeklyBattles said:
I'd rather we wait until i make the revision to discuss their scaling
I agree talk about the current upgrade to these characters in this thread, worry about the scaling in another thread
 
They are definitely at least 3-A. That much is undeniable from the innumerable quotes stating the Trinity would be fused into one and that a new universe/reality/world would be created, with the old one destroyed in the process.

About the Low 2-C rating however, from what I recall of Bayonetta, the context of the whole "a new history will be created" or "time will begin again" statements are less that space and time would be resetted, but more about the fact that all traces and all relics left behind by the past, would be destroyed, and that the new universe would have its own history, and its own era. The "memories of time" is a theme across both games:

For example, the Journal's Echoes notes about the Eyes of the World and this concept:

Since the Eyes of the World, as stated above, possess the power to view the past, the present and the future.

So this statement?

  • "They both possessed an "Eye," said to have the power to create history, that they used to oversee the world."
This is nothing more than a reference to the memories of time. We know the context is the same because of the following statements:

  • "Long since erased from the records of time, there once existed two European clans who served as overseers of history for the powers that be: The Umbra Witches, dwellers of the darkness, and the Lumen Sages, controllers of light."
  • "Long have two eyes, one light and one dark, watched over the world and its history."
"History" is used interchangeably with the past and its relics in this context. We saw from the above excerpt how the Eyes could oversee history; they had the power to see the future, the past, and the present, and record them. This is the context of "creating" and "giving rise to a new history". This is even more evident when you look at the full quote for the latter statement:

This statement by Balder also further establishes the context:

History refers to the relics and memories of time. Bayonetta 2 just continues:

Loptr states:

Which is followed by:

Which further suggests that the context of the universal recreation was making a universe where history would be molded by him, as opposed to a literal spacetime reset.

So, ultimately, I agree with them being upgraded to "At least 3-A", and even "At least 3-A, possibly higher", with Bayonetta scaling as well. However, I currently don't agree with Low 2-C.
 
It's never stated they would destroy and recreate time in those literal words, nor any synonyms. Only that time would "begin anew", that the world would have a new history, and etc.

While it's reasonable to assume at a first glance that these statements mean time and space would be literally resetted, I made arguments explaining why I believe the context disproves that interpretation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top