- 18,625
- 18,681
@Elizhaa @Maverick_Zero_X @Celestial_Pegasus @Dereck03 @LephyrTheRevanchist
Please evaluate this when you have time.
Please evaluate this when you have time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think that's how that worksHe also said that he is best at destruction which implies that in terms of destruction he is even beyond omnipotent/almighty.
And that was all disproven the moment he didn't instantly kill Garou, he was actually getting stronger since he's met his match, proving more that it lies in the infinite potential part rather then already having infinite power.Not currently discussing it, but there were many instances where they implied his power. Such as there were a canon statement about infinite strength/power.
Isn’t “The statement can be taken as Tier 0” positive or am I tripping?Why it is my burden to prove negative?
Alright, let me demonstrate it for you.
The statement is “no limits' fallacy." This fallacy occurs when someone claims (in our case, Anos was claiming this) that the sword has no limits or boundaries, and can do absolutely anything without exception or limitation.
There are many things that I need to address:
- All his feats that are demonstrated as far till volume 4 are hax feats and not AP feats
- So simply saying (there are no anti-feats) does not counter the fact that it has no relevance to begin with)
- If you interpret the statement literally, it cannot be restricted because doing so would contradict its inherent nature. For instance, if something is considered to be at "tier 0," it must be capable of destroying itself, or else the statement becomes meaningless.
Unless you mean garuo is H3-A no.Not currently discussing it, but there were many instances where they implied his power. Such as there were a canon statement about infinite strength/power.
Are you implying that only high 3-A is infinite and the rest upper ones are not?Isn’t “The statement can be taken as Tier 0” positive or am I tripping?
Dread is talking about growing their power infinitely.Unless you mean garuo is H3-A no.
I think it's mostly just to be correct on using just the 4 volume feat. Like people know that the sword have feat proving this statement later but since as of now it doesn't, it should not count.Dread, you keep saying “until volume 4”, are you aware of a feat later on for this statement that will prove it right or wrong?
because if you’re doing this when you know the rating will come back in a few more volumes, you’re literally wasting everyone’s time and this is the most spiteful lame thing that I’ve seen on this wiki in the last 2 years.
Love that you ignored the entire rest of the message. Is this reportable?Are you implying that only high 3-A is infinite and the rest upper ones are not?
I am not really here entertaining with this topic.
I'm sorry but I won't waste my time in a spite thread like this, if WN Anos had the same proof and everything he proved about venuzdonoa was true that IT could destroy all things in creation. LN Anos has the same statement as WN Anos so there is no problem in assuming that venuzdonoa can destroy Militia world which is where it is located right now not counting the "Silver Sea".@Elizhaa @Maverick_Zero_X @Celestial_Pegasus @Dereck03 @LephyrTheRevanchist
Please evaluate this when you have time.
Obviously but since it is not translated officially which will go against VSBW standards. We only have raw and machine translated ones, and they will be denied here.Dread, you keep saying “until volume 4”, are you aware of a feat later on for this statement that will prove it right or wrong?
No. She means he has infinite power while I think he has infinite potentialDread is talking about growing their power infinitely.
Saitama has infinite potential not infinite power
In matter of fact, we never gave high 3-A for this statement. But I will take it as disagreement and will count it.I'm sorry but I won't waste my time in a thread of spite like this, if WN Anos had the same proof and everything he proved about venuzdonoa was true that IT could destroy all things in creation. LN Anos has the same statement as WN Anos so there is no problem in assuming that venuzdonoa can destroy Militia world which is where it is located right now not counting the "Silver Sea".
If we “know” the statement to be true, then this thread is a complete waste of staff time.I think it's mostly just to be correct on using just the 4 volume feat. Like people know that the sword have feat proving this statement later but since as of now it doesn't, it should not count.
There were explicit canon evidence of him having infinite strength.No. She means he has infinite power while I think he has infinite potential
noIs this reportable?
But… she’s stonewalling
Dread, for ****'s sake, stop being wilfully obtuse.Are you implying that only high 3-A is infinite and the rest upper ones are not?
I am not really here entertaining with this topic.
But… she’s stonewalling
Waste of time.Obviously but since it is not translated officially which will go against VSBW standards. We only have raw and machine translated ones, and they will be denied here.
Again, my purpose is to remove the rating till those feats are actual translated officially.
We indeed gave H3-A rating for that statement and was accepted as such.In matter of fact, we never gave high 3-A for this statement. But I will take it as disagreement and will count it.
No kidding, she responded to the first sentence of my message then said I won’t entertain this further
Yeah, there are many feats later that shows it scales to the cosmology so if the cosmology is tier 1 it will get the same rating. but as we don't know what tier cosmology is currently so it can be High 3ADread, you keep saying “until volume 4”, are you aware of a feat later on for this statement that will prove it right or wrong?
because if you’re doing this when you know the rating will come back in a few more volumes, you’re literally wasting everyone’s time and this is the most spiteful lame thing that I’ve seen on this wiki in the last 2 years.
What in the goddamn **** is this bullshit. Everything with infinite mass is High 3-A, as the glass has still infinite KG due to it having still desnity over an infinite volume.
Are you trying to tell me that destroying an universe with finite size and weight is more impressive than destroying anything with infinite volume?
If u have enough proof she is doing it on purpose then yes you can report.No kidding, she responded to the first sentence of my message then said I won’t entertain this further
Which is removed later. Dereck, you are sharing the most outdated profile in the history.
I don't want to entertain him if he is asking me to prove that tier 0 is infiniteIf u have enough proof she is doing it on purpose then yes you can report.
It went to shit from the first comment I’d we’re being honestThis thread went to shit the moment somebody decided to use the glass analogy and got mixed up between damage and destroy ngl
I agree with this. What if its like EE?damn, looks like no one wants to bring up the possibility for it being hax. oh well
That’s not what I saidI don't want to entertain him if he is asking me to prove that tier 0 is infinite
Bruh... it was not removed, it was upgraded over the years, H3-A became 2-B when the Silver Sea was introduced and then when timelines were proved the 3-A rating and High3-A became L2-C.Which is removed later. Dereck, you are sharing the most outdated profile in the history.
You could show the updated WN one which is found in my profile
ImmortalDread/Anos
vsbattles.fandom.com
Hasty, mind showing me any AP feats that are officially translated and being verified as farWaste of time.
absolute waste of time.
you are wilfully wasting staff time arguing for something you don’t believe and know not to be true.
Doesn't venuzdonoa have ee? Could make sense why it can "destroy" anything but still pretty sure hax once it gets to an infinite level starts to be rateddamn, looks like no one wants to bring up the possibility for it being hax. oh well