Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Also, how does one apply NLF… in-verse?
Anos actually implied this. This is the whole scan meaning, they can nuke everything.Anos didn’t say that Venuzboner can absolutely nuke anything but itself and if you’re not called Venuzboner it’s wraps, he thought plain and simple “it can destroy infinite things”
What's your suggestion for the replacement of High 3-A ?Introduction
My premise is to remove high 3-A as it is absolutely not supported by any feats and it is definition of NLF statement.
Anos Voldigoad
Anos Voldigoad (アノス・ヴォルディゴード, Anosu Vorudigōdo) is the reincarnation of the man who was feared as the Demon King of Tyranny 2,000 years ago and is the main protagonist of Maou Gakuin no Futekigousha. As the war between humans and demons raged on, Anos eventually grew tired of the constant...vsbattles.fandom.com
High 3-A:
There is absolutely no feat that supports this, and we no longer take NLF statements into account. Because you can simply argue for tier 0 for this statement.
Unknown rating till volume 6 or volume 8 are dropped where they demonstrated large AP feats.What's your suggestion for the replacement of High 3-A ?
No, the argument still stands because these statements alone can be used for AP if there's no anti-feats.Please, drop with the argument of (he never showed any contradicted feats) while all feats he presented has absolutely nothing to do with AP
Thanks for your opinion, this is what I am trying to say.I feel like if it has been shown to do this, or can be proven in some way, shape, or form, then it should stay. but if it has been shown to be countered by anything in its description, or its effects is based solely on hax, then it should probably be removed.
Idk who Phoenx is tbh.Why it sounds from Phoenx rn, but ay I don't assume anything
Anos actually implied this. This is the whole scan meaning, they can nuke everything.
The statement alone was not even referring to AP kind at all.No, the argument still stands because these statements alone can be used for AP if there's no anti-feats.
It should not be taken literal, I never claimed it should not be taken seriously.And since you've yet to prove your claim that "Anos' statement shouldn't be taken seriously" you have no reason to deny this argument.
You never brought any evidence to the table that the sword could do anything either?Dread you are not bringing any evidence to the table, or addressing anyone's arguments.
Which comments you have dropped and I did not respond to?I ask that you wait for staff to come to this thread if you aren't going to respond with anything of value.
This is my point, all AP feats that have been shown are way later in the story, volume 6 to volume 11.The writing itself makes it clear that Venezuela can destroy things that are infinite and it’s as simple as that.
Why are you deciding that Anos’s knowledge on his crutch is faulty? I’ve shown you that it isn’t a NLF, so what’s left for you to disagree with?This is my point, all AP feats that have been shown are way later in the story, volume 6 to volume 11.
This profile is only till volume 4.
Why no one is understanding this?
Because it is neitherWhy are you deciding that Anos’s knowledge on his crutch is faulty? I’ve shown you that it isn’t a NLF, so what’s left for you to disagree with?
Note: Please remember that character and narrative statements tend to use flowery language and exaggerate to certain degrees. Without any further context to clarify, statements such as characters being “beyond space-time”, having "Infinite power" or especially omnipotent statements are not enough to suggest upgrades. When reviewing a statement for potential upgrades, be sure to keep this in mind.
In matter of fact, it was only Hax feats.it's also possible that it isn't NLF, and really can do those things, but just through hax. but what do I know?
FRABetter nuke the verse
In destruction Anos did said he is truly the best and that can't be overlooked.
Let me explain why this is wrong..
It is from Anos's perspective
- If the source of the statement is reliable?
It has never been demonstrated even near to universe feats. (till volume 4)
- If the statement conflicts with the story or feats of the character?
Neither
- If the statement is only valid in the context of its setting, or if it holds up in comparison with other settings?
.
I mean if the best feat at that time is obly destroying mountain by exemple, how this feat could mean hugh3-A? An infinite sized glass is not high3-A in tier. (Isn't this whole logic used for the dimmension thing in first ? Infinite feat without context mean nothing)There is a difference between Hyperbole and NLF.
Hyperboles do exist inherently in stories, because they are actual literary technique used in literature to exaggerate something. However, none of what is in these scans are hyperboles at all. They are direct, narrative statements meant to be taken literally.
NLF is a fallacy that people use to argue against people who wank statements or feats to their highest interpretation. NLF statements do not exist inherently in a story. It isn't a literary technique or anything, it's a argumentative fallacy.
Saying that the statements in these scans are inherently invoking no-limits-fallacy is insane.
One again, Dread.
If the sword has effortlessly destroyed everything it's tried to destroy without any problems, then there is no anti feats against it being High 3-A.
What I'm saying is, even if there's no High 3-A feats, there's also no feats that actually debunk the High 3-A statements because it hasn't ever struggled to destroy anything it's been faced with.
No need. it's pretty clear that the statement is not NLF and it can be used.Send which AP feats that the sword has demonstrated near to this level in LN version
Where? Mind showing me the statement that is found in LN version till volume 4?In destruction Anos did said he is truly the best and that can't be overlooked.
So baseless claim? GotchuNo need. it's pretty clear that the statement is not NLF and it can be used.
I agree with Planck and phoenks here.
It's in volume 2Where? Mind showing me the statement that is found in LN version till volume 4?
Exactly ^^I mean if the best feat at that time is obly destroying mountain by exemple, how this feat could mean hugh3-A? An infinite sized glass is not high3-A in tier. (Isn't this whole logic used for the dimmension thing in first ? Infinite feat without context mean nothing)
Show meIt's in volume 2
Pls respond I triedSnip.
You can see hereShow me
“I am by no means almighty, and there’s no telling what impossibilities beyond our imaginations may appear in the future. In fact, the only thing in this world I can truly say I’m the best at is destruction.”
1. Anos knows his sword extremely well. He falls into option 2 of the page..
but still not completely believable. He is stated to be invincible. In truth, he is only invincible in comparison to whatever this wizard could dish out. A low fantasy "indestructible" is our city-block level.
He has absolutely no anti-feats in terms of hax, this became tiring how many times should I address this?2. Conflict = contradict. As you might recall, Venezuela has no anti-feats, and isn’t an outlier to Anos being fodder as it’s a separate weapon.
Look at the second point3. It has been shown to be valid in its setting kek, it’s destroyed all foes it met.
It does not support anything regarding high 3-A rating.You can see here
The ****.An infinite sized glass is not high3-A in tier.
Has he literally never used Venezuela to stab anyone? I don’t get what you’re getting at.He has absolutely no anti-feats in terms of hax, this became tiring how many times should I address this?
Why would hax feats even relate to AP feats? They are not related and can't be used to scale each other.
Look at the second point
This can show Anos know how much destruction he has and that's why he said venzudonor to be infinite.It does not support anything regarding high 3-A rating.
Stabbing anyone? Why is this even relevant.Has he literally never used Venezuela to stab anyone? I don’t get what you’re getting at.
It's an exemple that the feat of "how infinite it is" doesn't mean high 3-A. An infinite sized glass with 1mm of tickness is not high 3-A yet it still infinite in size.The ****.
Neither high 3-A, you are proving my point.“but still not completely believable. He is stated to be invincible. In truth, he is only invincible in comparison to whatever this wizard could dish out. A low fantasy "indestructible" is our city-block level.”
Yes ImmortalDread, in our tiering system, being able to destroy anything is not immediately Tier 0, this is a fact.