• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

half 2-C is against the standards and should be eliminated

Status
Not open for further replies.
omegabronic said:
nope, because of these two https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Heavy_King
vsbattles.fandom.com

Time Eater

The Time Eater is one of the primary antagonists in Sonic Generations, acting as the final boss of the game. After Dr. Eggman was defeated once again and his interstellar amusement park was destroyed,[1] he discovered the Time Eater. After learning of it's abilities, Dr. Eggman then used it to...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com

only one that would really get that is blaze since she only eer fought 2-Cs and 2-B

but alas
Click to expand...
Tbh they would be via scaling from the Super Forms
 
Antvasima said:
Can somebody explain what neens to be evaluated here please?
Click to expand...
TL;DR, two characters busting two timelines as 2-C can't be halved to get Low 2-C, it'd still be 2-C but unquantifiably below baseline as per our current standards for Tier 2 in general, given that we have a strict policy against getting higher into Tier 2 with multipliers and because of how Tier 2 and above work where even causing miniscule damage to a Tier 2/1 structure would still cause you to be Tier 2/1 but unquantifiably below baseline because division doesn't work there anymore due to their nature, so Beerus and co. will be rated as "At most 2-C".

Any other verse following the logic of still being at "At least Low 2-C" because of this (At least Low 2-C per character since two characters of equal strength caused a 2-C feat), Sonic at the moment, would also thus be upgraded as a result.
 
Antvasima said:
Can somebody explain what neens to be evaluated here please?
Click to expand...
KLOL506 said:
TL;DR, two characters busting two timelines as 2-C can't be halved to get Low 2-C, it'd still be 2-C but unquantifiably below baseline as per our current standards for Tier 2 in general, given that we have a strict policy against getting higher into Tier 2 with multipliers and because of how Tier 2 and above work where even causing miniscule damage to a Tier 2/1 structure would still cause you to be Tier 2/1 but unquantifiably below baseline because division doesn't work there anymore due to their nature, so Beerus and co. will be rated as "At most 2-C".

Any other verse following the logic of still being at "At least Low 2-C" because of this (At least Low 2-C per character since two characters of equal strength caused a 2-C feat), Sonic at the moment, would also thus be upgraded as a result.
Click to expand...
Thank you. 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

@DontTalkDT @Executor_N0 @Ultima_Reality

What do you think about this?
 
KLOL506 said:
TL;DR, two characters busting two timelines as 2-C can't be halved to get Low 2-C, it'd still be 2-C but unquantifiably below baseline as per our current standards for Tier 2 in general, given that we have a strict policy against getting higher into Tier 2 with multipliers and because of how Tier 2 and above work where even causing miniscule damage to a Tier 2/1 structure would still cause you to be Tier 2/1 but unquantifiably below baseline because division doesn't work there anymore due to their nature, so Beerus and co. will be rated as "At most 2-C".

Any other verse following the logic of still being at "At least Low 2-C" because of this (At least Low 2-C per character since two characters of equal strength caused a 2-C feat), Sonic at the moment, would also thus be upgraded as a result.
Click to expand...
I guess at most 2-C is fine.
 
KLOL506 said:
TL;DR, two characters busting two timelines as 2-C can't be halved to get Low 2-C, it'd still be 2-C but unquantifiably below baseline as per our current standards for Tier 2 in general, given that we have a strict policy against getting higher into Tier 2 with multipliers and because of how Tier 2 and above work where even causing miniscule damage to a Tier 2/1 structure would still cause you to be Tier 2/1 but unquantifiably below baseline because division doesn't work there anymore due to their nature, so Beerus and co. will be rated as "At most 2-C".

Any other verse following the logic of still being at "At least Low 2-C" because of this (At least Low 2-C per character since two characters of equal strength caused a 2-C feat), Sonic at the moment, would also thus be upgraded as a result.
Click to expand...
Would someone who downscales from multipliers to someone above baseline 2-C still be 2-C?
 
That's what I said, chip damaging a 2-C character would still be 2-C even if "At most" might be needed. Though I mentioned that combined might of two characters being needed to perform a baseline 2-C feat was what I considered an unknown degree above baseline Low 2-C. I'll wait for when Ultima is ready to tackle his side, but it may also include group efforts to also be within the "At most 2-C" department as opposed to Low 2-C.

Also, to answer omega's question, normally the upscaling Low 2-C to 2-C isn't allowed with the exception that there actually was a 2-C feat being downscaled. Where as downscaling from a 2-C feat being at least half of that is currently accepted. However, it is possible it might just be 2-C with "At most" added. But we're waiting for that revision first.
 
DarkDragonMedeus said:
That's what I said, chip damaging a 2-C character would still be 2-C even if "At most" might be needed.
Click to expand...
That is correct.

DarkDragonMedeus said:
Though I mentioned that combined might of two characters being needed to perform a baseline 2-C feat was what I considered an unknown degree above baseline Low 2-C.
Click to expand...
Not anymore, standards make it unquantifiably below baseline 2-C, but still 2-C nonetheless.

DarkDragonMedeus said:
I'll wait for when Ultima is ready to tackle his side, but it may also include group efforts to also be within the "At most 2-C" department as opposed to Low 2-C.
Click to expand...
Best to just wait then, he's recuperating from COVID but still not yet ready to get back to work.

DarkDragonMedeus said:
Also, to answer omega's question, normally the upscaling Low 2-C to 2-C isn't allowed with the exception that there actually was a 2-C feat being downscaled. Where as downscaling from a 2-C feat being at least half of that is currently accepted. However, it is possible it might just be 2-C with "At most" added. But we're waiting for that revision first.
Click to expand...
The "At most 2-C" part at the moment needs no sitewide revision with the current standards. Ultima's upcoming Tier 2 CRT is a whole other beast completely unrelated to this, it was just merely something I wanted people to keep in mind as a general thing.
 
Last edited:
DarkDragonMedeus said:
That's what I said, chip damaging a 2-C character would still be 2-C even if "At most" might be needed. Though I mentioned that combined might of two characters being needed to perform a baseline 2-C feat was what I considered an unknown degree above baseline Low 2-C. I'll wait for when Ultima is ready to tackle his side, but it may also include group efforts to also be within the "At most 2-C" department as opposed to Low 2-C.

Also, to answer omega's question, normally the upscaling Low 2-C to 2-C isn't allowed with the exception that there actually was a 2-C feat being downscaled. Where as downscaling from a 2-C feat being at least half of that is currently accepted. However, it is possible it might just be 2-C with "At most" added. But we're waiting for that revision first.
Click to expand...
This thing reeks of being afraid of making Beerus 2-C 👽
 
KLOL506 said:
Funny. DBGT gets the full 2-C package treatment.

DBS is stuck with fodder BS.
Click to expand...
I mean, SSJ4FP Goku and SSJ4 Vegeta could scale to 1/10th of a 3-Universe 2-C, while Beerus level people are 1/2 of 2-Universe 2-C, so Beerus lvl people would be above SSJ4FP Goku.

Okay, that's kinda sad, yeah DBS is getting left in the ******* dust.
 
Eseseso said:
I mean, SSJ4FP Goku and SSJ4 Vegeta could scale to 1/10th of a 3-Universe 2-C, while Beerus level people are 1/2 of 2-Universe 2-C, so Beerus lvl people would be above SSJ4FP Goku.

Okay, that's kinda sad, yeah DBS is getting left in the ******* dust.
Click to expand...
SSJ4FP Goku scales directly to the 3-Universe 2-C actually, Vegeta is the one that scales to Syn although he does scale to positive Nuova I'm pretty sure, who scales down from Omega
 
Eseseso said:
I mean, SSJ4FP Goku and SSJ4 Vegeta could scale to 1/10th of a 3-Universe 2-C, while Beerus level people are 1/2 of 2-Universe 2-C, so Beerus lvl people would be above SSJ4FP Goku.

Okay, that's kinda sad, yeah DBS is getting left in the ******* dust.
Click to expand...
Nah, because they still scale to 3 universes instead of 2, DBGT would be just below baseline 3 universes, but still superior to whatever scaling 2 universes are here.
 
StrymULTRA said:
How does this affect Sonic charas? I did not get a good answer yet lol.
Click to expand...
Egg Salamander gets buffed to "At most 2-C" and is the only one who gets that rating (as Supers already scale to 12 universes from Time Eater's 2-C rating), Super Forms keep Low 2-C due to the Time Eater's low-end but get the "At least" removed from it, and... that's about it. There are plans to maybe upgrade the Time Eater, thus removing Low 2-C altogether, but that's not for this particular thread so we'll see where that goes.
 
ShakeResounding said:
Super Forms keep Low 2-C due to the Time Eater's low-end but get the "At least" removed from it, and... that's about it. There are plans to maybe upgrade the Time Eater, this removing Low 2-C altogether, but that's not for this particular thread so we'll see where that goes.
Click to expand...
About that, wouldn't the Time Eater just be 2-C due to scaling from the Super Forms?
 
ShakeResounding said:
Well, Time Eater's feat was at first only considered to be Low 2-C until the 2-C end got added. It'd just need a simple CRT to fully hash-out dropping the Low 2-C rating altogether, which is what I was referencing in my post. I know several supporters who agree with you
Click to expand...
Phantom king?
 
I’m assuming the profile refers to when Whis chopped beerus on the neck, instantly koing him. However, a neck chop works by manipulating blood flow to induce unconsciousness, so it’s kinda dura neg. Now that I think of it, is it really a good feat? All it shows is whis is strong enough to push beerus’ neck around.
 
StekFence said:
I’m assuming the profile refers to when Whis chopped beerus on the neck, instantly koing him. However, a neck chop works by manipulating blood flow to induce unconsciousness, so it’s kinda dura neg. Now that I think of it, is it really a good feat? All it shows is whis is strong enough to push beerus’ neck around.
Click to expand...
…
 
I’m not denying whis is stronger than beerus, I’m just saying this feat might not be the best for showing it if I’m right. Idk, maybe I’m wrong
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Omegabronic
"Multiverse of Power" Sonic the Hedgehog (Main Continuity) Cosmology Scalling continuation
2 3
Replies
102
Views
7K
JJSliderman
JJSliderman
Omegabronic
"Multiverse of adventures, less now" Sonic the hedgehog (Main Continuity) Cosmology page creation
Replies
37
Views
3K
Omegabronic
Omegabronic
Omegabronic
"A multiverse of adventures" A Sonic the Hedgehog Cosmology page creation + upgrade CRT: part 1 "The Cosmology"
2 3 4
Replies
133
Views
11K
Omegabronic
Omegabronic
Digital_Franz
Omniscient Reader's Viewpoint Verse Creation: The Cosmology Part 2
Replies
21
Views
3K
Digital_Franz
Digital_Franz
Peptocoptr27
Catching Up To The Games: Archie Sonic Speed Upgrades + Low 2-C Post Genesis Wave
2
Replies
78
Views
7K
Accelerated_Evolution
Accelerated_Evolution
Back
Top