If I am standing in the ocean, and I decide to erase the entire ocean, I'm erasing the ocean, not myself.
If I am floating in the middle of outer space, and I decide to erase it, I'm erasing outer space, not myself.
Do you get what I'm saying? You need evidence that Zeno would have collateral damage which is not something we generally assume when a character uses an ability on something around them (e.g., poison users do not get resistance for releasing a poison from their body, ice users do not get resistance for unleashing a frost from their hands; although, enduring the aftermath of their attacks, like unaffected standing in the frozen tundra they created, could qualify).
poison user covering the entire universe in poison would give resistance
ice user freezing the entire universe gets resistance
erasing the entirety of the universe you're in is resistance unless there's some kind of proof otherwise
but according to the statement zeno says, he clearly was not being discriminate with his erasure, so you'd still need to show something that suggests he just avoided touching himself with it
and again, it works because otherwise otherwise gods of destruction would be able to erase zeno, which just makes absolutely 0 sense
also those 2 analogies suck and here's why
zeno isn't part of the ocean, so erasing the ocean is just erasing water
zeno isn't a piece of empty space? so erasing empty space wouldn't erase himself.....it would just make the space more empty
zeno is a part of the universe/world, so it likely does apply
and he is also visibly engulfed in his own attack, which is still visible proof
there is no way to justify zeno having no EE
at the very least, he should have "likely resistance to EE" on his profile, since there's absolutely no evidence that suggests he CAN be erased