Pokémon follows a worldview where every material is meant to be happening in the grander universe so yes, it is canon
Answered above
Again if you want an actual non canon Pokémon thing, look no further than super Smash bros using Pokémon characters . Not on their official website, not on their YouTube, have no TPC seal on it.
Keep ignoring that
Now you know what a non canon Pokémon product is
I ignore baseless claims as this wiki doesn't follow whatever you say. There aren't even WoG claims for this "worldwide" view. Take just the things with direct confirmation and gg, not "everything is canon unless proven otherwise" wtf.
Like RéBURST.
Executor_N0 goes into detail.
Says you?
Issue is that it even covers crossovers like Conquest under said rule. I'm not against this but extending this to whatever spin off, no matter how obscure or irrelevant it is is definitely dishonest and purposely leading to just a wanked composite.
Looking at the Canon page, Conquest is a Onesided Crossover. Canon to Pokemon, but not to Nobunaga's Ambitions
Nah, but people are really overprotective to the point of forgetting the main point.
Im not sure what you're getting at
You used Dragonair as your argument, which was debunked, no?
You brought that up in your post. So I have to, and will address that
Well yeah, but even then, the question would remain because there’s just no crossover feats period in Conquest.
We make exception if said Pokémon is immensely different than regular ones. We have lots of examples.
Nobunaga's Rayquaza was given in an official Giveaway Event when the game got released on Gen 5 games.
That’s easily written off as a reference/crossover
I guess that every single movie Giveaway Event is that too... Sure, let's make this the exception. But I guess this wiki will literally do this too.
Care to place a wadger? I already mentioned this earlier, but it does abide by the canon lore of Pokémon and for a very big reason that I’m surprised people wouldn’t remember
And Phoenix Wright is still a blue-suited lawyer in Marvel vs. Capcom. So?
So you're just ignoring my evidence because yes?
Massive false equivalence. You can do better than this with an example
You blatantly said Conquest doesn’t follow canon lore. I gave you evidence that it does
Please, you don't have much time, as the thread has gone on for a long while and there's more than an overwhelming majority for passing it.
Aside from the fact that you're admitting there are even better examples for why your argument doesn't work, there's no false equivalence. I'm not going to entertain your roundabout point-missing jabs. Either prove that Conquest is objectively and strictly canon or not. No gameplay-only promotional events, an actual statement or piece of definitive proof that Pokemon Conquest is canon to the actual story of the game.
And doesn’t explain how it’s not a false equivalence and doesn’t bring a better example than the shitty one they pulled out of their ass.
Glad to hear your concession since bringing a counter argument doesn’t seem to be something your capable of.
Your "addressing" is literally "literal confirmation and explicit info about the provenience are just promotional material" when is literally just receiving a Mon from another universe.
You acquire Nobunaga's Rayquaza in the Core games, which is the same one that is used in Conquest
Wrong quote lol
A spin-off of a game having similar lore in the case of a single character is not enough to solidify it being canon, I won’t speak on whether Conquest is canon but this is not the smoking gun by a long shot
