- 32,835
- 38,111
Or maybe, staff are too stronk. Not all arrived at Planck's beck-and-call, who mind you, is a higher-dimensional goober than I am.That means your tag powers are weak.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Or maybe, staff are too stronk. Not all arrived at Planck's beck-and-call, who mind you, is a higher-dimensional goober than I am.That means your tag powers are weak.
(Continuing the argument of the post) Actually, the basis of your reasoning lacks support from any existing evidence, whereas what I am suggesting is that Kratos has already demonstrated the feat. My interpretation relies on a more grounded approach rather than assuming that "Kratos could not detect her power since it is immeasurable.You are not disproving why she won't grant the resistance instead of a sketchy assumption that her power is immeasurable, and hence Kratos could not detect it.
Why would not the reason be that she got resistance to his already feat, and hence he can't detect it.
Aha, but there is also no narrative reason that the reason Kratos could not detect it is that the power is immeasurable, either. Why would your interpretation be more valid? At least explain it.Because there is absolutely no narrative reason for Athena to have resistance to Kratos' powers when her being of a higher level of existence with higher power is far too much for Kratos to even fathom or come to terms with. That is literally the simplest explanation one can give you.
What are you even talking about, Dread? Speak sense or stop derailing with such silly assumptions that don't make sense to begin with.
Thanks for irony, no, I was responding to one of your reasons you used to give her 5D.I guess the real higher power was the information analysis resistance we got along the way.
Yet no proof of this at all.
- Her power is no longer measurable by Kratos, who can see through everything from the power of artefacts to the nature of beings that slip between the sheets of reality.
No, your interpretation is full on headcanon.(Continuing the argument of the post) Actually, the basis of your reasoning lacks support from any existing evidence, whereas what I am suggesting is that Kratos has already demonstrated the feat. My interpretation relies on a more grounded approach rather than assuming that "Kratos could not detect her power since it is immeasurable.
Aha, but there is also no narrative reason that the reason Kratos could not detect it is that the power is immeasurable, either. Why would your interpretation be more valid? At least explain it.
Thanks for irony, no, I was responding to one of your reasons you used to give her 5D.
Yet no proof of this at all.
Why would he imply in terms of power? It is more he could not detect the difference in appearance, which she later explained that looks can be deceiving.Kratos can't discern any difference in her new state. He even comments that "you still appear to be an Olympian" to him in direct response to her saying she ascended.
Wait, if I am not missing anything, why would appearance relate to the magic and power or be equivalent to?He'd be able to tell said difference if he could sense her magic and it'd strength as per usual. That's the observation of the scene. Something anyone can tell you if they watch it.
Because his information analysis can be better used for it's intended purposes rather than ogling at his dead half sister.Why would he imply in terms of power?
Skill Issue identified :- Can't read between lines.Wait, if I am not missing anything, why would appearance relate to the magic and power or be equivalent to?
He can see people's power, their magic and abilities. Said magic is a universal energy system that's responsible for all attributes, physical or otherwise, in the series.Wait, if I am not missing anything, why would appearance relate to the magic and power or be equivalent to?
Kratos was a 3-D demigod when he could sense the power of weapons and beings that could command fate to a high enough degree to cause the merge and destruction of realities on a whim.Could not be that when she ascended to higher existence, she grants resistance to information analysis because the dimensionality of the ability is 4D or 3D?
Could be a good argument that you can't detect or hax her unless the dimensionality of said ability is equivalent to her HDE?
Could not be that when she ascended to higher existence, she grants resistance to information analysis because the dimensionality of the ability is 4D or 3D?
Could be a good argument that you can't detect or hax her unless the dimensionality of said ability is equivalent to her HDE?
Or maybe you can wait for more staff votes?Could be a good argument that you can't detect or hax her unless the dimensionality of said ability is equivalent to her HDE?
My point is, that she could gather side advantages for being HDE which includes preventing any ability that have lower dimensionality than hers.Kratos was a 3-D demigod when he could sense the power of weapons and beings that could command fate to a high enough degree to cause the merge and destruction of realities on a whim.
But we already proved her AP scales to her level of existence.My point is, that she could gather side advantages for being HDE which includes preventing any ability that have lower dimensionality than hers.
I am presuming, I don't know if there is any anti-feats to what I am saying.
Not related to what she's asking right now, not like it matters, her question is in of itself, derailing.But we already proved he's AP scales to her level of existence.
Seems odd since the one who brought the point is Planck, and I am simply questioning his claim and the reasons why it would be valid.Not related to what she's asking right now, not like it matters, her question is in of itself, derailing.
I dunno about you but I feel that her just being too powerful for him to sense requires less assumptions than Athena pocketing random resistances via ascending to a higher plane.My point is, that she could gather side advantages for being HDE which includes preventing any ability that have lower dimensionality than hers.
I am presuming, I don't know if there is any anti-feats to what I am saying.
My reasoning is that HDE do allow those type of side advantages while range of his ability requires more assumption. Specially we are relying on our interpretation in a visual feat.I dunno about you but I feel that her just being too powerful for him to sense requires less assumptions than Athena pocketing random resistances via ascending to a higher plane.
Absolutely is derailing since it's no longer pertaining to the actual pieces of evidence in OP at hand.I don't see any part of my comments to be derailing as long as it is within the scope of the thread's relevance.
Is this not your buddy fault for bringing up the point?Absolutely is derailing since it's no longer pertaining to the actual pieces of evidence in OP at hand.
I disagree with your reasoning, like Planck said, simply assuming that Athena got far too OP for Kratos to make heads and tails out of is the much simpler interpretation that is far more in line with the game's narrative as a whole. Yours just takes more extra steps to take that assumption to be put into effect.My reasoning is that HDE do allow those type of side advantages while range of his ability requires more assumption. Specially we are relying on our interpretation in a visual feat.
But does it bring any ?I disagree with your reasoning, like Planck said, simply assuming that Athena got far too OP for Kratos to make heads and tails out of is the much simpler interpretation that is far more in line with the game's narrative as a whole. Yours just takes more extra steps to take that assumption to be put into effect.
inconsistencies/anti-feats? If not, I don't see how it is invalid.
Why are you talking about inconsistencies and anti-feats here? How the **** are they relevant in this part where narrative is the main key to proving this whole case?But does it bring any?
You mean visual narrative? Ya sure, I think those are valid to be discussed if my interpretation is not indeed inconsistent or contradicted in-verse. So instead of dodging my question, simply answer it if there is indeed, so I can concede that it can't be by any chance.Why are you talking about inconsistencies and anti-feats here? How the **** are they relevant in this part where narrative is the main key to proving this whole case?
Welcome back to the communityYou’re wrong. All the pantheons are mere planets. Every realm is an island or country. God of War is not tier 2.
I agree.
Dimensionality has never given resistances though.My reasoning is that HDE do allow those type of side advantages while range of his ability requires more assumption. Specially we are relying on our interpretation in a visual feat.
And my last question is, does this indeed bring inconsistencies/anti-feats? If not, I don't see how it is invalid.
Dimensionality has never given resistances though.
Pseudo-Invulnerability: Due to the additional axis spatially inherent to them, higher-dimensional objects are comprised of more information than what can normally be described in lower-dimensional spaces, and thus may only be capable of interacting with them through lower-dimensional "slices" or cross-sections of their bodies.
So my interpretation is not invalid. Alright noted. We can move on.It doesn't but neither does the latter case. Heck, neither does 1-A Athena. That being said, lacking issues isn't proof of being legitimate.
All stated in the OP. You can check and check the sources.So let me get this straight this are the arguments for Athena
1. She was stated to have ascended to a higher plane
2. She was said to have power beyond anyone in the verse
3. Kratos could not measure her power level
Did I miss anything?
Read the OP because there is more.So let me get this straight this are the arguments for Athena
1. She was stated to have ascended to a higher plane
2. She was said to have power beyond anyone in the verse
3. Kratos could not measure her power level
Did I miss anything?
Here are counter-argumentsDid I miss anything?
I did and I did not find anything else, so please point me to the other pointsRead the OP because there is more.
Nine Realms are low 2-C structures for having different flows of time and shit like that, then you have the bifrost which "transends" everything inside the realms and Realms themselves are nothing more than little structures on infinite branches on the yggdrasil. Each branch "transending" space and time altogether to the point that it's meaningless to the yggdrasil. And yet, Athena is even beyond that, more specifically, on a "higher plain of existence".
I did and I did not find anything else, so please point me to the other points