- 2,363
- 1,523
- Thread starter
- #241
@Jasonsith Do you feel like adding this to the RfCF page along with the rest of the accepted feats?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What do you think @DontTalkDT?Now, there is one last speed blog I'd like us to consider adding to the RfCF page: speed of electricity.
There are several pages on this wiki that use this blog to determine said characters' speed such as Supersonic or Hypersonic. It seems like it'd be a valuable asset to the speed feats section of the RfCF page, but if not, maybe we could create a page for it or put it in the Projectile Dodging Feats page.
What does everyone think? Would we be able to add it to the Common Feats page?
DontTalkDT already evaluated this long ago and suggested using the 104 kJ valueI also happened to come across a few more blogs I think would prove to be beneficiary:
Evaluated, accepted, added to our Reference pages eons ago and heavily updated multiple times since then. I recommended many of the objects myself
Also largely accepted, added and updated over time. Cloud Calculations has its own page.
CloverDragon03 already made a brand-new blog for that, which DT also accepted most of the parts minus a couple things on your blog since you did put the link on your blog. But the blog is still largely incomplete, the gun speed is currently incorrect and I recommended GUNS, LOTS OF GUNS to calculate since not all firearms are built the same and even flintlocks and wheellocks of yore are much faster than what the blog actually states.
Deemed unnecessary as per the blog comments. 3-B as it is, perfectly fine.
Already evaluated, accepted and applied to the Table of Destruction Values by me, Bambu, Executor and several other calc group members ages ago. I was the one that gave Spino some of the links.
M3X said he edited the calc to DT's specifications and Ugarik also added an additional non-cloud-to-ground variant in the comments. Not sure if that was ever accepted.
Old and deprecated. Was handled here and here.
Prolly old and deprecated at this point, since we made many new changes to our storm feats since then.
Already has a page on the wiki.
DT suggested some fixes which I'm not sure if they have been applied yet. Haven't tackled astronomy in my physics class yet. But yeah, seems useful, though I've been looking for that dreaded "Solar System shake" calc all over the place with no results.
Using KE for cells is whack, especially if it's sorta pseudo-whack for IRL animals larger, heavier and stronger than us. There's a CRT for IRL animals not scaling to their KE except in special situations if they are like, really large animals and whatnot.
Definite nope. The blog looks at a very specific example under very specific circumstances and doesn't generalize in the slightest.What do you think @DontTalkDT?
Ah, so it's not common enough to qualify.Definite nope. The blog looks at a very specific example under very specific circumstances and doesn't generalize in the slightest.
Well, from what I can recall we have already approved and added the following:
I'd like us to add and evaluate:
- Vaporizing Earth
- Snowstorm Feats
- Freezing the Earth (organized and improved)
- Pocket dimension with a moon
- Getting hit by a subway train
- Melting a car
- Energy required to destroy planets/stars at certain distance
I found several more vaporization feats I'd like to get evaluated and added:
- Energy to create/destroy a forest
- Destroying a Sink/Toilet
- Freeze a city
- Punching through a car roof
- Destroying New York City
- Destroying the statue of liberty
- Destroying a Continent REDONE
- Destroying Great Britain
- Punching through a skull
Here are some atomization feats I'd like to get added and evaluated:
- Vaporization of Iron revision
- Vaporizing Spain
- Vaporizing a volcano
- Vaporization of Titanium Value
- Vaporising Tokyo Tower
- Vaporising the entire atmosphere
- Vaporising a tank
- Energy to Vaporize a Car
Will continue to update.
Accepted.I'd like us to add and evaluate:
Accepted.
Also accepted.
Added a better source to use for thickness in the comments (You have to buy the book tho, but the comments I linked do it for you).
I was planning on doing it myself honestly while including ground-based boom formula.
Accepted by M3X and former calc member Crimson Azoth.
Antarctica end was accepted as reasonable.
Accepted but ground-based version (Which is also accepted) still not added to the blog yet.
Needs to be changed to use a bigger fist impact area of at least 40 cm^2.
This kinda never reached a conclusion.I found several more vaporization feats I'd like to get evaluated and added:
Still needs to be evaluated, I'd like the opinion of another calc member first before I tackle it.
Accepted by Armorchompy as long as surface area (Or I should say, cross-sectional area) is applied, but that depends on distance from the epicenter of the destruction.
Wasn't this accepted and added to the Table of Destruction Values 6 years ago?
Not sure if it's a common-enough feat, but Bambu's re-do wields 5.94 kilotons.
This calc kinda never got finished, huh, I wonder what the heck happened...
Wrong vaporization value used, the M1 Abrams is not made of ordinary steel, but rather Chobham Armor, which is mostly a depleted uranium alloy. It should be re-done with specific heat capacity and boiling point of depleted uranium (We only have melting point so it's a ******* crapshoot). Plus at least 75% of the tank's mass is made up of that stuff.
Seems like this never got finished
Blog isn't actually about atomization (It was a naming mistake)Here are some atomization feats I'd like to get added and evaluated:
Old calc, should be re-done using the new cast iron frag, v. frag and pulv. destruction values that we have on our Table of Destruction Values chart now.
Need further input from other calc members for this one.
Lina Shields got 317 teratons with his recalc.
Prolly wait for someone capable to edit the calc in into the page, since the References page bugs out for me due to the sheer number of calcs.@KLOL506 will my slicing swords calc be added?
Well, the bones in a wrist are a little thicker than the sword's metal, iinm.
The speed value could vary based on various factors, such as voltage or amperage or stuff.Ah, so it's not common enough to qualify.
What do you think about the speed value tho? Is it okay to use for the Projectile Dodging Feats page? Or is the calc incorrect?
I am sure last time a MLP character has a similar feat.I created yet another crushing calc
To be honest, in fiction, surviving in vacuum space could be hax (like a type of self sustenance), it could be a durability by itself (like some deep sea fishes and characters are wall level+ because of simply surviving for being there). Or in some verses any character can survive in vacuum space because of body skin and internal organ durability but can be hurt by far less.I asked because in fiction there are all sorts of instances of characters being in the vacuum of space without turning into skin balloons like how it would really happen for normal people
I’d like to know how to do that, plstheoretically the durability to survive in outer space is totally calculable
That's way too thin for a wall. Interior walls are 4.5 inches thick at the bare minimum.Just a pretty simple calc I thought of that happens in a lot of street level action media, getting punched through walls
From the human-sized hole calc we have that the cross-sectional area is 9500 cm^2. From the punching through wall calc we have wall thickness as 1.905 cm.
Concrete: 9500*1.905*6 = 108 585 Joules
We could do ends for v. frag and pulv too as well as different materials like rock and steel, just a quick calc I thought of that is often a pretty good feat for peak humans.
I mean I could do it I guess, you would just need to open the page for meIs there really no staff member here that would be willing to take on the responsibility of properly updating this page?
A long time has passed with nothing happening here.