- 6,457
- 1,187
@DontTalkDT mind trying to calc running up a wall?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Expanding the References for Common Feats page
- Thread starter Omnificence
- Start date
- 2,238
- 1,429
- Thread starter
- #323
Do you mind sending some then, please?
- 6,457
- 1,187
To ask, will a contruction jackhammer get a page?
- 2,238
- 1,429
- Thread starter
- #326
@Antvasima Who else can we get to do this?
- 2,238
- 1,429
- Thread starter
- #328
Can we send them some notifications then, please?
- 2,238
- 1,429
- Thread starter
- #331
Take your time then. Get well soon.
- 15,995
- 25,057
Are there any common feats for characters generating waves or being able to manipulate large bodies of water?
- 7,881
- 8,115
Anyone?
- 2,238
- 1,429
- Thread starter
- #336
I think we should also be adding blogs and articles that deal with calculations on a Tier 3 scale seeing as how we don't have any such common feats added to the page that would be placed on that tier.
- 2,238
- 1,429
- Thread starter
- #338
Oh, is that so? I see; that may be a bit of a problem.
Well, what if we add calculations that deal with such feats on a smaller scale such as these:
But before we add them, we obviously get these calculations evaluated first by the calculation group. If we can do that, then they should be fine.
- 32,774
- 37,943
Needs evaluations, and I'm not the guy to do it.
This one should be added.
It's been made and accepted like, twice now? Mogo's calc was accepted and this is just the same calc copy-pasted.
Needs evaluations. Once again, I ain't even started my astronomy classes yet
Not sure if this is even up-to-date
This one I don't trust, specifically the GBE value of the Galaxy.
- 2,238
- 1,429
- Thread starter
- #340
Can the second and third ones be added for now?
- 6,457
- 1,187
What are the destruction values for cypress?
- 32,774
- 37,943
EDIT: 1.0-2.1 and 1.0-1.9 MPa shear strength according to this.
- 6,457
- 1,187
- 32,774
- 37,943
Couldn't find any compressive strength value for this one unfortunately.
- 6,457
- 1,187
@KLOL506
I found this article
Looks like it ranges from 1747 J/cc to 2661 J/cc depending upon the air quality
I found this article
Looks like it ranges from 1747 J/cc to 2661 J/cc depending upon the air quality
Last edited:
- 32,774
- 37,943
You put the commas in the wrong place, and you used commas for starters. We don't use commas for decimal points with International Standards.
- 6,457
- 1,187
I converted MPa to J/cc, is there a problem?
- 32,774
- 37,943
Nah, just that you used commas instead of decimal dots for the numbers, that's just a minor issue. Everything is fine.
- 6,457
- 1,187
Well, I meant for it to be 1747 J/cc to 2661 J/cc depending upon the air quality
- 165,081
- 71,958
@KLOL506 @Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan @Jasonsith
Would any of you be willing to add the new sufficiently accepted standard calculations in appropriate places in the relevant reference page please?
Also, is anybody willing to improve on the organisation within it?
Would any of you be willing to add the new sufficiently accepted standard calculations in appropriate places in the relevant reference page please?
Also, is anybody willing to improve on the organisation within it?
- 6,457
- 1,187
What AP is needed to rip someone's face off?
XVII
They/Them- 422
- 180
- 6,457
- 1,187
Susie needs an upgrade
- 32,774
- 37,943
Yeah I have no idea on what reasonable ground ripping faces off would be 10-A in any spectrum. It has to be 9-C at the bare minimum.
- 6,457
- 1,187
Wonder if it translates into lifting strength too?
- 32,774
- 37,943
Definitely.
- 165,081
- 71,958
Anyone?
- 6,457
- 1,187
- 32,774
- 37,943
Prolly not, too many variables at play
- 2,238
- 1,429
- Thread starter
- #360
Anyway, does anybody mind adding these calculations to the page?
