- 2,226
- 1,424
- Thread starter
- #161
Well, it's not just spelling errors...I've copied and pasted the text from the page into Grammarly and there are also some problems pertaining to the punctuation, wording, and whatnot.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Expanding the References for Common Feats page
- Thread starter Omnificence
- Start date
- 164,957
- 71,676
Thank you. It is very appreciated.I did what I could find.
References for Common Feats
Throughout fiction and real life, there have been numerous feats demonstrating a certain character's or object's destructive power. This page's purpose is to consolidate calculations for those feats for better convenience in determining an object's or character's Attack Potency or Durability...vsbattles.fandom.com
- 164,957
- 71,676
Would you be willing to fix the spelling and punctuation errors, and not change anything else, if I unlock the page for you?
- 2,226
- 1,424
- Thread starter
- #164
Unless someone else would like to volunteer, sure.
Last edited:
- 4,084
- 2,127
It's nice to see someone try and expand the References for Common Feats thing.
Well, first, there was this: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Drite77/Destroying_wooden_crates
The guy who made the blog declined to get the calc evaluated due to the sheer amount of variables here.
For the Launching Someone into Space thing, yeah, that was accepted under the caveat that it would only be for a single strike.
Well, first, there was this: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Drite77/Destroying_wooden_crates
The guy who made the blog declined to get the calc evaluated due to the sheer amount of variables here.
For the Launching Someone into Space thing, yeah, that was accepted under the caveat that it would only be for a single strike.
- 2,226
- 1,424
- Thread starter
- #166
Perhaps we could still get it evaluated and added.
- 32,737
- 37,870
I evaluated and accepted it myself. I still asked that Bambu and Spino evaluate it too given their experience regarding calc'ing common feats.It's nice to see someone try and expand the References for Common Feats thing.
Well, first, there was this: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blogrite77/Destroying_wooden_crate
The guy who made the blog declined to get the calc evaluated due to the sheer amount of variables here.
@Mr._Bambu @Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan
- 2,226
- 1,424
- Thread starter
- #168
Alright, let's see if we can evaluate and add these feats. Some of them are probably already accepted by calculation group members, so maybe we can pend those to the Common Feats page.
- 164,957
- 71,676
Okay. I will unlock the page. Tell me here when you are done.
- 2,226
- 1,424
- Thread starter
- #170
I'll probably have to wait until I get off work, but I'll be sure to do it as soon as I'm done, unless you'd like someone else to do it in the meantime.
- 4,084
- 2,127
Ah. I just now saw your comment on that. Hmm, well, to me, the best way to reduce clutter is to make that nonsense into a collapsable table.
- 2,226
- 1,424
- Thread starter
- #173
References for Common Feats
Throughout fiction and real life, there have been numerous feats demonstrating a certain character's or object's destructive power. This page's purpose is to consolidate calculations for those feats for better convenience in determining an object's or character's Attack Potency or Durability...
vsbattles.fandom.com
@Antvasima Well, that's all I could find atm; don't think I found all of them, but I guess it's done for now. Did you want the standard format for Common Feats added to all of them, too?
- 2,226
- 1,424
- Thread starter
- #175
You're welcome. If I still see some, I might just copy the entire source code and paste it into a grammar checker and give it to you guys.
Last edited:
- 2,226
- 1,424
- Thread starter
- #176
Alright, now let's get back to evaluating and accepting these feats and calculations.
Also, since we only have the low-end for lighting one's self on fire which is Supersonic, I think we'll have to look around the wiki and change pages' speeds that use this feat from Hypersonic to Supersonic.
- 164,957
- 71,676
@DontTalkDT @Executor_N0 @Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan @Mr._Bambu @Therefir @DMUA @Damage3245 @DemonGodMitchAubin @Jasonsith @Wokistan @Armorchompy @KieranH10 @Migue79 @Psychomaster35 @Amelia_Lonelyheart @DragonGamerZ913 @KLOL506 @M3X @Dark-Carioca @AbaddonTheDisappointment
Your further help would be very appreciated here.
Your further help would be very appreciated here.
- 32,737
- 37,870
I'm pretty sure there are some examples on the wiki for bare bodies lighting themselves up on fire. The thing is, the Supersonic value is for lighting yourself on fire if you are clothed, if you are bare-naked, then the Supersonic+ value would apply. 1666 m/s is Mach 4.86, which isn't Hypersonic, but Supersonic+.
- 3,013
- 2,421
Huh, I always thought that feat was Hypersonic
- 2,226
- 1,424
- Thread starter
- #180
I guess that's something we should take into account then, but right now we can't be using anything higher than the low-end DontTalk accepted until or unless we're able to get any other ends accepted and added to this common feat.
Still contemplating though on whether or not we should update character pages' speeds of this feat accordingly or wait until we can add more info to the common feat.
- 10,500
- 9,487
What exactly do you want me to evaluate @CreatorJoe
- 10,496
- 11,505
The problem with the 1666 m/s value is that it assumes 1500°C is to be reached due to that being cremation temperature for humans i.e. they assume you get so hot that a normal human would burn to ashes. I see no reason to assume the heat gets big enough for that, unless that actually happens to the character. Being hot enough to burn body hair and/or fat and oils in the body should already be enough to catch on fire.
- 32,737
- 37,870
Yes.
- 32,737
- 37,870
I see. Okay then.
- 10,500
- 9,487
Sure. I'll go and check them out. If some of there have been evaluated already I'll just leave it.
- 3,013
- 2,421
- 3,013
- 2,421
- 3,013
- 2,421
I'll specify in my comment that I mean all are accepted.
- 2,226
- 1,424
- Thread starter
- #198
Maybe @DontTalkDT or some other administrators/content moderators in this thread could do it.
- 2,226
- 1,424
- Thread starter
- #199
Now, while we're on the same page pertaining to speed, I really do think we should consider adding this Catching An Arrow calculation to the References for Common Feats page. I already know @DontTalkDT rejected it, but I'm thinking about making some arguments for this so that we can consider.
