- 2,226
- 1,424
- Thread starter
- #241
@Jasonsith Do you feel like adding this to the RfCF page along with the rest of the accepted feats?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Expanding the References for Common Feats page
- Thread starter Omnificence
- Start date
- 32,736
- 37,870
What do you think @DontTalkDT?
- 2,226
- 1,424
- Thread starter
- #243
I also happened to come across a few more blogs I think would prove to be beneficiary:
- Fire Calculations
- Calculations for Destroying Certain Objects
- Understanding Cloud Calculations
- "Frozen Time" Calculations
- Energy necessary to destroy Virgo Supercluster and multiple galaxy superclusters
- Some missing destruction values
- Lightning creation feats
- Angsizing
- storm blog revision
- Inverse Square Law Page
- Shaking The Stars
- Low KE Calculations
- 32,736
- 37,870
DontTalkDT already evaluated this long ago and suggested using the 104 kJ value
Evaluated, accepted, added to our Reference pages eons ago and heavily updated multiple times since then. I recommended many of the objects myself
Also largely accepted, added and updated over time. Cloud Calculations has its own page.
CloverDragon03 already made a brand-new blog for that, which DT also accepted most of the parts minus a couple things on your blog since you did put the link on your blog. But the blog is still largely incomplete, the gun speed is currently incorrect and I recommended GUNS, LOTS OF GUNS to calculate since not all firearms are built the same and even flintlocks and wheellocks of yore are much faster than what the blog actually states.
And while the formula itself uses snail speed, it's just one of the possible speeds you can use, with cinematic times we can accurately gauge the amount of pixels the slowed-down object is seen to move, and then we can dump the values into the formula above.
Deemed unnecessary as per the blog comments. 3-B as it is, perfectly fine.
Already evaluated, accepted and applied to the Table of Destruction Values by me, Bambu, Executor and several other calc group members ages ago. I was the one that gave Spino some of the links.
M3X said he edited the calc to DT's specifications and Ugarik also added an additional non-cloud-to-ground variant in the comments. Not sure if that was ever accepted.
Old and deprecated. Was handled here and here.
Prolly old and deprecated at this point, since we made many new changes to our storm feats since then.
Already has a page on the wiki.
DT suggested some fixes which I'm not sure if they have been applied yet. Haven't tackled astronomy in my physics class yet. But yeah, seems useful, though I've been looking for that dreaded "Solar System shake" calc all over the place with no results.
Using KE for cells is whack, especially if it's sorta pseudo-whack for IRL animals larger, heavier and stronger than us. There's a CRT for IRL animals not scaling to their KE except in special situations if they are like, really large animals and whatnot.
Last edited:
- 2,226
- 1,424
- 6,455
- 1,187
I would like to add my own calc to the references page too: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Hagane_no_Saiyajin/Slicing_swords
- 10,496
- 11,503
Definite nope. The blog looks at a very specific example under very specific circumstances and doesn't generalize in the slightest.
- 32,736
- 37,870
Ah, so it's not common enough to qualify.
What do you think about the speed value tho? Is it okay to use for the Projectile Dodging Feats page? Or is the calc incorrect?
- 2,226
- 1,424
- Thread starter
- #250
- 32,736
- 37,870
Accepted.
Accepted.
Also accepted.
Added a better source to use for thickness in the comments (You have to buy the book tho, but the comments I linked do it for you).
I was planning on doing it myself honestly while including ground-based boom formula.
Accepted by M3X and former calc member Crimson Azoth.
Antarctica end was accepted as reasonable.
Accepted but ground-based version (Which is also accepted) still not added to the blog yet.
Needs to be changed to use a bigger fist impact area of at least 40 cm^2.
- 32,736
- 37,870
This kinda never reached a conclusion.
Still needs to be evaluated, I'd like the opinion of another calc member first before I tackle it.
Accepted by Armorchompy as long as surface area (Or I should say, cross-sectional area) is applied, but that depends on distance from the epicenter of the destruction.
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan/Vaporizing_a_volcano
Wasn't this accepted and added to the Table of Destruction Values 6 years ago?
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Alakabamm/Vaporization_of_Titanium_Value
Not sure if it's a common-enough feat, but Bambu's re-do wields 5.94 kilotons.
This calc kinda never got finished, huh, I wonder what the heck happened...
Wrong vaporization value used, the M1 Abrams is not made of ordinary steel, but rather Chobham Armor, which is mostly a depleted uranium alloy. It should be re-done with specific heat capacity and boiling point of depleted uranium (We only have melting point so it's a ******* crapshoot). Plus at least 75% of the tank's mass is made up of that stuff.
Seems like this never got finished
Blog isn't actually about atomization (It was a naming mistake)
Old calc, should be re-done using the new cast iron frag, v. frag and pulv. destruction values that we have on our Table of Destruction Values chart now.
Need further input from other calc members for this one.
Lina Shields got 317 teratons with his recalc.
- 6,455
- 1,187
@KLOL506 will my slicing swords calc be added?
- 32,736
- 37,870
Prolly wait for someone capable to edit the calc in into the page, since the References page bugs out for me due to the sheer number of calcs.
- 2,226
- 1,424
- 6,455
- 1,187
- 2,226
- 1,424
- Thread starter
- #257
Well, the bones in a wrist are a little thicker than the sword's metal, iinm.
- 10,496
- 11,503
The speed value could vary based on various factors, such as voltage or amperage or stuff.
So what I meant by saying it doesn't generalize is that I'm unsure under which circumstances other feats would match what is happening in the video.
- 14,081
- 11,035
When's the common feat for reducing dudes to just immolated skeletons coming 
- 2,226
- 1,424
- Thread starter
- #260
@DontTalkDT Do you think you can add the feats @KLOL506 listed off?
- 6,455
- 1,187
I created yet another crushing calc
- 13,753
- 13,984
I am sure last time a MLP character has a similar feat.
Equestria Girls: Sunset Shimmer crushes a skull with her bare hands
vsbattles.fandom.com
- 6,455
- 1,187
@Jasonsith I fixed it, I converted incorrectly
- 2,226
- 1,424
- Thread starter
- #265
@Jasonsith @DontTalkDT Did anyone else wanna offer to add the recently accepted feats?
- 6,455
- 1,187
Not sure if this derails the thread, but what is the minimun durability to survive in the vacuum of space?
- 14,081
- 11,035
That's less a durability thing then it's a physiology thing.
Space isnt gonna be hitting you with energy or force (or well, it could but it isn't coming from the vacuum, it'd be from other shit), it's just a bunch of adverse effects or lack thereof that ***** ya over.
A literal ant's body can physically survive in a vacuum even if the ant itself can't due to the adverse effects.
Space isnt gonna be hitting you with energy or force (or well, it could but it isn't coming from the vacuum, it'd be from other shit), it's just a bunch of adverse effects or lack thereof that ***** ya over.
A literal ant's body can physically survive in a vacuum even if the ant itself can't due to the adverse effects.
- 6,455
- 1,187
I asked because in fiction there are all sorts of instances of characters being in the vacuum of space without turning into skin balloons like how it would really happen for normal people
- 13,753
- 13,984
To be honest, in fiction, surviving in vacuum space could be hax (like a type of self sustenance), it could be a durability by itself (like some deep sea fishes and characters are wall level+ because of simply surviving for being there). Or in some verses any character can survive in vacuum space because of body skin and internal organ durability but can be hurt by far less.
Usually more context is required, although theoretically the durability to survive in outer space is totally calculable.
- 6,455
- 1,187
I’d like to know how to do that, pls
- 2,226
- 1,424
- 6,455
- 1,187
When will my sword slicing calc be added?
- 164,955
- 71,672
@DontTalkDT @Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan @Jasonsith @KLOL506
Your further help here with evaluating which calculations that are acceptable, and then adding them to our standard feats page, would be very appreciated.
Your further help here with evaluating which calculations that are acceptable, and then adding them to our standard feats page, would be very appreciated.
- 11,095
- 4,317
Just a pretty simple calc I thought of that happens in a lot of street level action media, getting punched through walls
From the human-sized hole calc we have that the cross-sectional area is 9500 cm^2. From the punching through wall calc we have wall thickness as 1.905 cm.
Concrete: 9500*1.905*6 = 108 585 Joules
We could do ends for v. frag and pulv too as well as different materials like rock and steel, just a quick calc I thought of that is often a pretty good feat for peak humans.
From the human-sized hole calc we have that the cross-sectional area is 9500 cm^2. From the punching through wall calc we have wall thickness as 1.905 cm.
Concrete: 9500*1.905*6 = 108 585 Joules
We could do ends for v. frag and pulv too as well as different materials like rock and steel, just a quick calc I thought of that is often a pretty good feat for peak humans.
- 32,736
- 37,870
That's way too thin for a wall. Interior walls are 4.5 inches thick at the bare minimum.
Also we should make ends for stone walls and reinforced concrete walls as well. Load-bearing walls are often made of reinforced concrete and can be 8 inches to a foot thick.
- 2,226
- 1,424
- Thread starter
- #277
Can I get you to send notifications once more? Sorry for asking you this. I'll look for anyone else willing to update the page.
- 2,226
- 1,424
- Thread starter
- #279
- 15,325
- 14,945
I mean I could do it I guess, you would just need to open the page for me
All I have to do is add the calcs in the OP right?
