- 18,861
- 27,531
Introduction
SoI'm evil now this is a tentative downgrade maybe it won't end up as a downgrade, but I'll elaborate further. This is clearly the brain child of Deceived.
Addressing ETSO's Creation
Our creation page states the following,
Lastly, the creation of the object(s) in question needs to happen within a reasonably short timeframe for the whole result to apply to the Attack Potency.
The obvious implication here is that creation feats need a combat applicable timeframe in order to be quantifiable for AP. And in the instance in which the timeframe is not combat applicable, but it is known, we simply divide by the timeframe in seconds to get a yield in energy per second. This is seen all throughout the wiki commonly with overtime feats, but as for a creation feat that follows this protocol look no further this calc. In the aforementioned calc and realm with a star is created over 3 days, and we divide by that time to get the feat quantifiably at High 5-A.
Why this matters for the ETSO is because, as far as I am aware, there is no means of reasonably obtaining a timeframe for how long it would take the ETSO to create a realm with a star. The ETSO never stays around long enough to expand across an AU's distance to consume a star as we currently treat it capable of, and it doesn't appear to have been expanding quickly at all, it only reached the size of a large mountain. I believe we have even less indication of how long it would take for its creation. If that is the case, the feat is unquantifiable and its rating would need to get removed from Kaguya's verse page.
Conclusion
The ETSO needs to have its rating removed if there is no means of reasonably quantifying a short time frame or a timeframe at all. However, if someone can quantify a timeframe we can adjust the feat by dividing by said timeframe to accurately quantify it. Let's keep it civil and I'm interested to hear anyone's thoughts on obtaining a timeframe here.
Agree: ingempest, amage, ubin (maybe change the rating to possibly), LOL, ordracer, ordriffin (fine with a possibly)
Neutral:
Disagree:
So
Addressing ETSO's Creation
Our creation page states the following,
Lastly, the creation of the object(s) in question needs to happen within a reasonably short timeframe for the whole result to apply to the Attack Potency.
The obvious implication here is that creation feats need a combat applicable timeframe in order to be quantifiable for AP. And in the instance in which the timeframe is not combat applicable, but it is known, we simply divide by the timeframe in seconds to get a yield in energy per second. This is seen all throughout the wiki commonly with overtime feats, but as for a creation feat that follows this protocol look no further this calc. In the aforementioned calc and realm with a star is created over 3 days, and we divide by that time to get the feat quantifiably at High 5-A.
Why this matters for the ETSO is because, as far as I am aware, there is no means of reasonably obtaining a timeframe for how long it would take the ETSO to create a realm with a star. The ETSO never stays around long enough to expand across an AU's distance to consume a star as we currently treat it capable of, and it doesn't appear to have been expanding quickly at all, it only reached the size of a large mountain. I believe we have even less indication of how long it would take for its creation. If that is the case, the feat is unquantifiable and its rating would need to get removed from Kaguya's verse page.
Conclusion
The ETSO needs to have its rating removed if there is no means of reasonably quantifying a short time frame or a timeframe at all. However, if someone can quantify a timeframe we can adjust the feat by dividing by said timeframe to accurately quantify it. Let's keep it civil and I'm interested to hear anyone's thoughts on obtaining a timeframe here.
Agree: ingempest, amage, ubin (maybe change the rating to possibly), LOL, ordracer, ordriffin (fine with a possibly)
Neutral:
Disagree:
Last edited: