• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Elden Ring General Discussion

I'm just here to remind you that you are maidenless.

439
 
Hum considering one of the ending of the game and her reaction to that specific ending, I kind of doubt that
Actually I take that as all the more reason for her to be connected to it. Who better to understand the evil of a thing than someone who once followed it? She has the burn marks of Frenzied Flame on her eye, implying the use of such spells, and deliberately speaks out against it.
 
Actually I take that as all the more reason for her to be connected to it. Who better to understand the evil of a thing than someone who once followed it? She has the burn marks of Frenzied Flame on her eye, implying the use of such spells, and deliberately speaks out against it.
Mmh that would make sense
 
Dunno if we've already debunked scaling to Walking Mausoleums in early game, but if it's still a point of discussion then I'd say this is pretty bad news for that particular thread of discussion, cuz this means a one shot even with end-game health
 
Dunno if we've already debunked scaling to Walking Mausoleums in early game, but if it's still a point of discussion then I'd say this is pretty bad news for that particular thread of discussion, cuz this means a one shot even with end-game health

Can confirm, I got one shot with 99 bitch vigor expecting to face tank it.

Maybe there's some lore to scale it to a boss or something but tanking scaling isn;'t a option.
 
Can confirm, I got one shot with 99 bitch vigor expecting to face tank it.

Maybe there's some lore to scale it to a boss or something but tanking scaling isn;'t a option.
For ****'s sake. There goes calc'ing the GBE or KE of those things jumping.
 
Damn, and some of them dont even have skulls on the feet. Though for some reason I've been able to tank some attacks from a few of them.
 
Only some attacks instant kill, I guess maybe if one of the noninstant kill moves happens to be one of the calculatable attacks then I guess that'd be ok?
 
"Guys listen, we're trying to save animals from humans which means if we kill it, it's your fault. It's your fault for having this animal in a loving and nurturing environment. We had to kill it because you had it, and that's not ok. Animals are not slaves, even though 99% of you treat them like members of your family. When we finally kill every pet animal, there will be no animals left to be enslaved, and our work will be done."
 
If Godfrey kills you with his grab, he digs his fingers into your chest, and tears it open.

If Rykard grabs kills you, instead of tossing, he eats you.
 
Last edited:
Only some attacks instant kill, I guess maybe if one of the noninstant kill moves happens to be one of the calculatable attacks then I guess that'd be ok?
I don't think I've ever been insta killed by it stomping. Though had all my health depleted one time.

The only times I instantly died against it was when I tried to jump on it and fell 😭
 
Back
Top