• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Dragon Ball Super Discussion Thread 100

Dude, the "/" is an "or". I was saying that I thought no DB film before Super was canonical in general anime/manga.
Even then no because Garlic Jr got an entire filler arc in the anime to himself, not to mention the assload of references to the movies thanks to GT considering Fusion Reborn part of its continuity which included a bunch of movie villains.
 
Even then no because Garlic Jr got an entire filler arc in the anime to himself, not to mention the assload of references to the movies thanks to GT considering Fusion Reborn part of its continuity which included a bunch of movie villains.
I do not care.

I said "I thought" because I don't see much of the TOEI continuity, and I only saw it in general. I don't care if it's non-canon for the anime.
 
No he didn't, he never saw that in Z
0312-013.png
 
Broly and the rest of the toei movies have a direct connection to fusion reborn since the characters from the movie appear while invading Earth, you can see Bojack, a crusher corp member, Paragus etc.

I feel like with it not fitting with the movie you could just justify Goku going into base for Gohan's interview, and Vegeta is simply a victim of bad writing like other Toei filler moments (Gohan jobbing to a regular ass whip moment)

I feel like you can't really say that Fusion Reborn fits the timeline but others don't without just applying headcanon to it, there's literally no timeslot for the movie to have happened since Goku and Vegeta are never dead at the same time long enough to fight Janemba, and you can't really ignore the blatant appearances of Paragus and stuff

Yes, all films are canon to each other, not here where there is a lot of bureaucracy.
 
According to Koyama, yhe guy who wrote them all, the movies share a Timeline. As little sense as that makes at times. Fusion Reborn being canon to GT necessarily makes the other films canon retroactively, identically to how Cooler appearing retroactively makes his films canon—Though for some reason this is ignored on Wiki. Well, all except Super 13, as they’re the only film villains who don’t show up.

(An argument could be made that either 1} fully mechanical Androids in Dragon Ball have no Soul, and thus cannot be revived by Shenron. As seen with 16, so it was a purposeful decision. Or 2} They were just ignored. Unfortunately, GT contradicts rule 1, having A19 appear, so it matters not regardless and as such A13’s lack of appearance makes it exempt from the retroactive canoning.)
 
According to Koyama, yhe guy who wrote them all, the movies share a Timeline. As little sense as that makes at times. Fusion Reborn being canon to GT necessarily makes the other films canon retroactively, identically to how Cooler appearing retroactively makes his films canon—Though for some reason this is ignored on Wiki. Well, all except Super 13, as they’re the only film villains who don’t show up.

(An argument could be made that either 1} fully mechanical Androids in Dragon Ball have no Soul, and thus cannot be revived by Shenron. As seen with 16, so it was a purposeful decision. Or 2} They were just ignored. Unfortunately, GT contradicts rule 1, having A19 appear, so it matters not regardless and as such A13’s lack of appearance makes it exempt from the retroactive canoning.)
If I'm not mistaken, the manga also mentions about Android 13.
 
According to Koyama, yhe guy who wrote them all, the movies share a Timeline. As little sense as that makes at times. Fusion Reborn being canon to GT necessarily makes the other films canon retroactively, identically to how Cooler appearing retroactively makes his films canon
film in singular, we don't consider his sequel movie to be canon

—Though for some reason this is ignored on Wiki. Well, all except Super 13, as they’re the only film villains who don’t show up.

(An argument could be made that either 1} fully mechanical Androids in Dragon Ball have no Soul, and thus cannot be revived by Shenron. As seen with 16, so it was a purposeful decision. Or 2} They were just ignored. Unfortunately, GT contradicts rule 1, having A19 appear, so it matters not regardless and as such A13’s lack of appearance makes it exempt from the retroactive canoning.)
well.....then that is a shoot in the head for Fusion reborn being canon as the contradictions would severely outweight the evidence in this case
 
in the words of Hasty himself:
The funniest thing is to think that Chronos from ND is the same Cronos from episode G, i think the right thing would be to separate, because both works do not fit into the plot in any way

What I find most funny is that some profiles use EPG to provide conceptual manipulation, whereas the original did not show this
 
Back
Top