- 136
- 17
That was meant for Julian's response lmao.Sevestus said:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That was meant for Julian's response lmao.Sevestus said:
Which one? Because the one on the OP is literally just more of the "Many World Theory" stuff, which is 2-B.Super Saiyan God Julian said:Xenoverse actually has a 2-A statement
The English statement is a mistranslation. And no , the japanese one is a 2-A statement. It says "limitless/infinite branches (there's the Mugen Kanji)" or "Infinitely branched" (which doesn't mean infinitely branching)Ionliosite said:Which one? Because the one on the OP is literally just more of the "Many World Theory" stuff, which is 2-B.
Actually, yes, but they're not like the English ones.Eganergo said:Does the Japanese even uses tenses?
[URL='https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/vsbattles/images/0/06/3zwq69.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20200503170653'][IMG alt="3zwq69 said:https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/vsbattles/images/0/06/3zwq69.jpg/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/180?cb=20200503170653[/IMG][/URL]
Everything12"]
That picture is wrong in that instead of playing along with Xeno Goku, Archie Sonic will instead be stomping him
Everything12 said:That picture is wrong in that instead of playing along with Xeno Goku, Archie Sonic will instead be stomping him
Drop it. That was already discussed to death and is nowhere near as blatant as this.Badrimoine2019 said:Strange because if this was true than Ben 10 cosmology would already be 2-A
Pretty sure that was rejected.ChocomilkAlex said:Also I'm pretty sure FateHax is getting removed from Archie Sonic sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
No, it is not; the thread didn't get concluded. This topic is best save for another thread.Elizhaa said:Pretty sure that was rejected.
This sums up my opinion.Zenkaibattery1 said:2-A + scaling chain without "At least" can be fine.
Boi, read the OP more closely. I already explained why it isn't 2-B. That statement suggests there are infinite possible paths that history can take, and then another character confirms that there is a timeline for every possibility. If there are infinite possibilities and you have a timeline for each one of them, that's 2-A by default.Firephoenixearl said:I don't disagree i just want to ask about something:
History is infinitely branched out
Why did you use this as evidence for 2-A? If something is branched out infinitely it just means it...well....keeps on branching to no end. So it just keeps on growing endlessly. That is just 2-B.