• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Dragon Ball: Finite Universe

Status
Not open for further replies.
If most of the people here agreed mostly because of the inconsistencies in the series, I think the next CRT I'll make about DB will be much more simple than this one. Regardless, thanks to everyone who participate.
if is because of the inconsistences, the DB supporters would have a easy time arguing, because that can be contend upon.
 
I want to know if DB ends up having a finite or infinite universe in this wiki. I am commenting on this post just to know when the arguments reach their conclusion.
 
I want to know if DB ends up having a finite or infinite universe in this wiki. I am commenting on this post just to know when the arguments reach their conclusion.
its most likely finite
most of the mods agreed and there isnt much opposition from other
 
Interesting. A bit unrelated, but how big is the DBS cosmology? 5D? 4D?

4D, as any standard fictional cosmology, basing off real life (three spatial dimensions and one temporal dimension).

do all their multiverse exist in the same 3D space?

If you refer to the 12 Universes, then yes, they share the same 3D space. However, that's a topic for another thread, let's not derail here.
 
4D, as any standard fictional cosmology, basing off real life (three spatial dimensions and one temporal dimension).



If you refer to the 12 Universes, then yes, they share the same 3D space. However, that's a topic for another thread, let's not derail here.
So you're gonna start a thread to downgrade DB down to High 3-A?

Anyways, disagree FRA
 
Where? You asked if the multiverse shares the same space? If this was accepted, no one in DBS would have been rated 2-C
DBS would've been 3-A lmao

God, the nightmares have yet to be returned
 
4D, as any standard fictional cosmology, basing off real life (three spatial dimensions and one temporal dimension).



If you refer to the 12 Universes, then yes, they share the same 3D space. However, that's a topic for another thread, let's not derail here.
3-A universe ain't happening buddy. This has been brought up many times before and each time it was rejected. Don't even try unless you have new argument or evidence. In fact, the staff made a discussion rule against it a while ago. The macrocosm will remain 2-C(3U).
 
If he does that he will create a rule, this is the third time someone has tried to do this, I will be happy to create a rule about it.
God, I'm so sickened of goddamn rules

Ad nauseam, it is
 
this crt was agreed by 3 mods and majority of the people with no real counter argument
its waiting for 48hrs rule i think
Pretty sure there's been more than 48 hours; actually, this thread should be closed if the changes are gonna be applied in another crt.
 
this crt was agreed by 3 mods and majority of the people with no real counter argument
its waiting for 48hrs rule i think
Wdym no real counter-argument? 无线 translate to infinity. Nonetheless, the only proof in this thread of the Universe possibly being finite is Bulma's statement of "edge of Universe". However she only referred to the universe and we could inferred to she was insinuating the observable universe rather than the space-time continuum itself.
 
3-A universe ain't happening buddy. This has been brought up many times before and each time it was rejected. Don't even try unless you have new argument or evidence. In fact, the staff made a discussion rule against it a while ago. The macrocosm will remain 2-C(3U).
just ask staff for permission, if they give he can do as he pleases, we also had a rule against infinite universe, yet we all knew what happened don't we?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top