- 13,225
- 21,036
You can keep claiming that, but ultimately you're trying to get staff to accept your threadNope that's not how it works. You explained it and I debunked said explanation by giving actual reasoning instead of just claiming it's my burden.
You're debating on VSBW so you kinda have to careSo? I don't care.
That's... literally just our standards. Like, look up "Calc Stacking" on the wiki itself and you'll see just that. You can't use a previously calculated speed or reaction time in another calculation. If someone's Supersonic via scaling to someone else who scales from a calc, then they get blitzed by someone, you can't use Supersonic reaction time to calculate that feat.Are you gonna ignore what I just stated? I told you to prove your claim "anything else is calc stack". Go fetch me a scan saying this or hitchen's razor might have to clear your argument. Justify the claim that my arguments are fallacious and burden shifting. So far I've debunked everything you claimed.
You haven't "debunked" anything no matter how much you try to assert that, if anything I just get the feeling you simply don't like our standards
I'm ignoring the possibility of it being an outlier for now for the sake of discussion, just sayingAre you gonna prove as to why it's not used. Give me a thread since I literally asked within these few minutes of proof and never received such. It's crazy how you jump from hyperbole to outlier once you get confronted by an actual high speed calc. You're funny. Either way, positive claim too. Why is it an outlier. Go ahead and prove it. I'll be waiting.
As for the Muichiro calc, a Calc Group Member most recently commented on even the lowest end of Mach 112 being too high. So there you go
Because the lightning traveled more distance than he did in the same time. That's the basis of the calcWhy is he slower than lightning when all he does is cover the distance to Genya and push him. He's not trynna do all kinds of movements during this timeframe. It goes against your cherry picked evidence, btw.
Feel free to claim as you wish, but ultimately, you're trying to get staff to accept this revisionCan't actually defend their claims, constantly fails burden of proof, burden switching, cherry picking but insists on this dishonest stance.
Sure, you can keep this stance doesn't mean your reasonings aren't completely fallacious and dishonest.