Deletion of the Hyperverse and Outerverse Pages (Proposal)

[Ultima_Reality]

That should be fairly straightforward. I was originally planning to do this anyways, for a while, but I figured doing it without input from the community was a bit dishonest and kinda shady, so anyways.

I believe we should delete both the Hyperverse and Outerverse pages. The reason behind why I believe this, is that they are just plain redundant and only serve to explain terms that are already explained in the Tiering System page, and are currently just names, and don't specifically refer to structures of any kind, being moreso just measures of power and whatnot. They are also outdated, particularly the Hyperverse page, which implies 1-B structures and realms must be necessarily physical and spatio-temporal when put together with the contents Outerverse page, when that is not necessarily the case anymore.

So, any opinions? Personally, I am fine with keeping the Hyperverse page if the majority deems it necessary, but I can't find any use to the second one.

 

[CrimsonStarFallen]

What about these pages?

 

[Jasonsith]

But how do we redefine 1-B and 1-A then? Or re-draw the lines of 1-C?

Or just max out author-tier characters at Tier 0 and any infinite ^ infinite ^ infinite dimensions ... transcending infinite ^ infinite ^ infinite dimensions ... transcending infinite ^ infinite ^ infinite dimensions shenanigans would be Tier High 1-A and then we back tier others?

 

[Ultima_Reality]

What about these pages?

Those are very basic terms that would need some measure of clarification, though, at least for our purposes, especially the latter, which is chock full of misconceptions among a bunch of VS Debating communities.

Hyperverse and Outerverse are just extensions of the former concept which are already explained in the Tiering System page, as I've said.

 

[CrimsonStarFallen]

Gotcha.

Then yeah, i agree with deleting the pages.

 

[Andytrenom]

Were neither of them updated after the revision? If no then deletion is probably okay. Especially given the point of them not referring to an actual kind of structure, just a level of power

 

[Ultima_Reality]

But how do we redefine 1-B and 1-A then? Or re-draw the lines of 1-C?

Or just max out author-tier characters at Tier 0 and any infinite ^ infinite ^ infinite dimensions ... transcending infinite ^ infinite ^ infinite dimensions ... transcending infinite ^ infinite ^ infinite dimensions shenanigans would be Tier High 1-A and then we back tier others?

I am not actually proposing that we change the tiers altogether, just delete those two explanation pages in particular.

 

[Celestial_Pegasus]

Agreed.

 

[PrinceOfTheMorning]

Seems fine to me.

 

[Matthew_Schroeder]

I agree too.

 

[Ionliosite]

Makes sense, I agree.

 

[Dienomite22]

I didn't know those pages existed

 

[Kepekley23]

I agree with your point of view.

 

[Antvasima]

I suppose that this seems harmless if the Tiering System page and Tiering System Explanation Page sufficiently explains how these tiers function for our visitors already.

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

I agree as well.

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

Yeah as long as we aren't changing the tiering system again deleting those two is fine

 

[Jasonsith]

Tier 1-B is literally named Hyperverse level

And Tier 1-A is literally named Outerverse level

How do we rename these tiers?

Or are we just deleting the "pages" of Hyperverse and Outerverse and merging the contents into the Tiering System Explanation Page?

 

[Ultima_Reality]

We are just deleting those pages, yeah.

 

[Antvasima]

I would appreciate if you check through them to see if there are any parts of them that would be useful for our visitors to explain elsewhere though.

 

[Jasonsith]

I have backed up the profiles just in case.

User blog:Jasonsith/Sandbox: Explanation Page - Hyperverse and Outerverse

 

[Antvasima]

Thank you for trying to help out.

 

[Ultima_Reality]

I can see the code of deleted pages, so that's not really needed, but thank you, nonetheless.

So, I suppose I can go ahead and delete those?

 

[Antvasima]

I think so, yes, as long as there is not any information worth preserving in them.