Bare minimum we have U10 and U7 in the alternate timelines, the fact that U10 is still referenced that way should be self-evident that the 12 macrocosms still exist, but either way there’s still a timeline overarching multiple time dimensions, since U7 and U10 still exist bare minimum.
stop explaining, gonna have to agree to disagree, we put the scans right there.
This.
Implies means there is no evidence that this overarching timeline exists? By this logic, every verse with alternate timelines should be low 1-c since they can use this same logic.
You guys keep saying there is, but you haven't shown any evidence that it actually exists.
changing the past of universe 7 does not affect the other universe sevens, only the universe 7 that it originally occured on. If there was no hypertimeline, that would not be the case.
There is no set logic or physics on how a universe is supposed to behave. It behaves so because the story makes it so. This isn't evidence of a hypertimeline. The only evidence of a hypertimeline is if the story says it exists.
The source is the DBS Interval Special that was released during the manga's four-month hiatus. It is official lore written by Toyotaro to explain and supplement the canon.
Honestly to mee this seems obstinate just to be obstinate but I'll assume you don't know much about the DB cosmology and entertain this.
There's not really any particular scan of direct mention of an overarching timeline encompassing multiple time dimensions or space-times but it's gotten from context and how whenever a new timeline is created it also carries on over and contains the multiple macrocosms which house their own time dimensions.
^ beware you're not bound to convince each existence that disagrees, if you have said your thing. Agree to disagree is only thing left rather than dragging it to 9 pages.
this is the last and final cope, anyway i will not address these claims any longer.
"It just works" is not a real argument tbh.
You don't need explicit wording. You just need evidence that there exists a timeline structure that all the timelines exist in. It is that simple.
Explain to me how a verse can get a rating for something that has never be shown to exist?
How does this prove there exists a timeline/time dimension that all the timelines and parallel universe exists in? It doesn't prove anything.
DBS Manga - Chapter 26: Zeno destroying the Future timeline.
As soon as Zeno destroys the multiverse in Trunk's timeline, the ring breaks.
Also, Future trunks and Zamasu come from the exact same timeline, which would not be the case if there was no timeline covering all the universes.
Timelines exist. But this thread is claiming the existence of an overarching timeline that all the timelines exist in. But no one has shown any evidence that this over arching timeline actually exists.
I'll just make it simple. I'll delete redundant comments with a warning and if it happens again the user will be thread banned.
You can have multiple timelines and parallel worlds in verse. I don't see why would this in essence gives low 1-C.
Can you specifically tell me where exactly is low 1-C here? Having multiple timelines (that are, essentially, "multiverses") does not give you low 1-C.
more than 3
Clarification: They don't need 5 staff approvals necessarily (there's no minimum requirement)
It's shown to exist it's just based on context and how things would fit in with said context not some uber direct statement. This is just being stubborn and ignoring literally everything else. You're contradicting yourself here by saying it doesn't have to be explicit but also indirectly saying it has to be explicit.
I see, thanks. Then all good ig.
No, it's 3 actually, but more than 3 are adviced. However 4 have agreed, so it's just till the grace period expires
What? No.
Exactly, the fact that places OUTSIDE the entire multiverse still get duplicated proves everything is under a bigger time dimension.
Fine. I will say this simply:
