• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

(DB Tier 1) We must imagine a DB scaler happy.

Status
Not open for further replies.
So… who’s getting upgraded?
 
Like last time, I'm open and in agreement with Low 1-C DB also. . .

"Technically speaking, our cosmology has been approved for Low 1-C"

Unless I'm misunderstanding, are you saying that our IRL cosmology is "Low 1-C"?
 
MrHazama said:
Unless I'm misunderstanding, are you saying that our IRL cosmology is "Low 1-C"?
Click to expand...
Technically, our cosmology is 10-D to 26-D according to many quantum string theories such as Superstring Theory and Bosonic String theory. Heck, even the Electromagnetic Spectrum alone is 5-D.
 
MrHazama said:
Pardon my lack of understanding, but I'm going to assume that's a yes?
Click to expand...
No. Our reality is rather High 1-C to 1-B which is actually countless times more advanced than many fictional cosmologies, ironically.
 
ImmortalDread said:
We are forced to draw this conclusion because there is no other explanation provided.

I have changed my stance to agreement, albeit with a possible/likely rating.
Click to expand...
This has not aged well. Depending on the outcome of Georr's thread, I find myself in agreement with DT, and thus, I don't believe a multiverse (or a timeline in our case) consisting of multiple other spacetime continuums suffices for tier 1.

Heh, my original thoughts on the standards have never changed and were initially correct, but I seemed to have doubted my sense of judgment.

I don't think any of you will recreate the thread to downgrade it, so I will be changing my stance to disagreement.

And please, don't come at me and say this is what Reiner's thread was about because DT himself stated that it was a complete standard modification, which he essentially doesn't agree with.
 
ImmortalDread said:
This has not aged well. Depending on the outcome of Georr's thread, I find myself in agreement with DT, and thus, I don't believe a multiverse (or a timeline in our case) consisting of multiple other spacetime continuums suffices for tier 1.
Click to expand...
cap
vsbattles.com

Re:evulation of temporal dimension standards

So the flow of time in different universes can be very independent while they have the same time axis. So other than R>F where one is fictionalized in depiction, what would count as an orthogonal timestream if even an independent time flow could be within the same axis?
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
Depends on context, but possibly yes. Although that hinges on the word time travel.

Like, fundamentally you could say that you have one timeline that spans multiversal space. In the beginning, that space is empty. Then you rewrite the past so that 3 universes already existed in the space (which is the same as creating 3 timelines). So you rewrite the timeline of the multiversal space.
Then you do the same again to add 5 more.

Technically, you could say you only spawned several more multiverse spanning timelines. Like, now a empty multiverse spanning timeline, a multiverse spanning timeline with 3 universes and a multiverse spanning timeline with 8 universes exist. The total number of timelines is only 11.
If you are able to travel between multiverse spanning timelines, you would also be able to switch back from the multiverse spanning timeline with 8 universes to the one without any universes/timelines.

However, if you do that specifically via time travel, then that could be a good indicator that you are actually dealing with an additional time dimension. Because that indicates that the progression of the creation of timelines is done within a (presumably continuous) flow of time and that time wouldn't be that of the regular past where those universes always existed.
Click to expand...

This is textbook DB example. DB isn't getting affected. It's still tier 1.

Carry on DB bois.
 
You essentially need to elaborate more with the scans attached because the main argument was that a timeline consisting of other timelines is alone sufficient which in fact is not.

As per say, me and DT has the same timezone and region, so for me it is 7 am (6:55), my responses will be slow.
 
ImmortalDread said:
This has not aged well. Depending on the outcome of Georr's thread, I find myself in agreement with DT, and thus, I don't believe a multiverse (or a timeline in our case) consisting of multiple other spacetime continuums suffices for tier 1.

Heh, my original thoughts on the standards have never changed and were initially correct, but I seemed to have doubted my sense of judgment.

I don't think any of you will recreate the thread to downgrade it, so I will be changing my stance to disagreement.

And please, don't come at me and say this is what Reiner's thread was about because DT himself stated that it was a complete standard modification, which he essentially doesn't agree with.
Click to expand...
DT hasn't even commented here.
 
ImmortalDread said:
You essentially need to elaborate more with the scans attached because the main argument was that a timeline consisting of other timelines is alone sufficient which in fact is not.

As per say, me and DT has the same timezone and region, so for me it is 7 am (6:55), my responses will be slow.
Click to expand...
I'm sure you were the one who pulled up the argument of standards first from DT's quotes from another thread. And now you're asking for scans attached for the specific verse which isn't a relevant counterargument.
confusion-what.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

REX9097
  • Locked
Ninjago: Tier 1
2 3 4
Replies
130
Views
8K
TheOrangeGuy09
TheOrangeGuy09
Reiner04
  • Locked
Dragonball: 1-B Timeline
2
Replies
67
Views
7K
Qawsedf234
Qawsedf234
Georredannea15
  • Locked
A downgrade for space beyond??[Ben10]
2
Replies
71
Views
6K
Firestorm808
Firestorm808
TheUnshakableOne
This Saint Seiya CRT Was A Mistake Part 1....................
2
Replies
46
Views
3K
Hasty12345
Hasty12345
LordGriffin1000
Danny Phantom/A Glitch in Time - Verse Cosmology Update/Potential Upgrade
Replies
16
Views
1K
Huesito88
Huesito88
Back
Top