- 13,903
- 5,404
Accepted calc
should be simple
should be simple
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Call Damage
should be simple
I don't care enough about this. Call someone else for it.Call Damage
the latterIt's hard to tell because of the lack of scans, but did the calc use the distance Boros' leg traveled, or the distance Boros' leg was in contact with Saitama. Because for momentum based calculations, you only use the timeframe the force was in contact with the object.
Or in this case, how long Boros [foot/leg] was in contact with Saitama. Not the entire distance it covered. Which would only increase the result.
I do agree of course, not that my vote matters.
I'll take your word for it. I thought from the wording it calc'd the entire distance Boros' leg traveled, including the distance where he wasn't in contact with Saitama.the latter
only the best for chad boros
Well, who are gonna be the ones to discuss it though? It seems Damage isn't interested.OH SHIT
I was gonna make a calc discussion thread for this because a few members didnt agree with it being usable for LS
But I guess we can just discuss it here
I argued this in the last thread butI can see why. It is from a kick. Though given the foot is in contact with Saitama for over a meter, I think it warrants being considered a "push" of sorts.
well, it seems like the people arguing that got debunked in the thread from before anywaysOH SHIT
I was gonna make a calc discussion thread for this because a few members didnt agree with it being usable for LS
But I guess we can just discuss it here
its not allowed to use MFTL+ acceleration to get force.Acceleration = 31655373500000000 m/s^2
I feel like this was already discussed multiple times in the previous Boros LS CRTDisagree.
its not allowed to use MFTL+ acceleration to get force.
What was the reasoning ?I feel like this was already discussed multiple times in the previous Boros LS CRT
Read the thread.What was the reasoning ?
MFTL+ acceleration
Force is rate of change of momentum. The said force has MFTL+ accelerationDid the calc even use the acceleration value? It looked like they just went on to calc the force using the relativistic momentum formula.
There was no reasoning at all.Read the thread.
Doesn't use that figure to find force.Lol. Lmao even
Then why even calculate it???Doesn't use that figure to find force.
No ideaThen why even calculate it???
Still the formula F=ma , p= F*t are closely related ,derived from Newton's second law.Then why even calculate it???
Isn't momentum mass x velocity, not force x time?Still the formula F=ma , p= F*t are closely related ,derived from Newton's second law.
momentum = Force *time
mass*velocity = Force*time
and velocity/time = acceleration , no matter what.
If such bypassing is allowed, then i have no problem
Since when ?MFTL acceleration is scientifically acceptable, MFTL velocity isn't.
Both mean the same thing.Isn't momentum mass x velocity, not force x time?
Shmeatywerbenmanjenson said:
I'm not gonna try to explain it but here's what this guys said
"Acceleration and speed a fundamentally different things. Speed is the change in position over time. Acceleration is the change in speed over time. Relativity limits speed not acceleration."
Some more sources:
Click to expand...
- https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/can-you-accelerate-faster-than-the-speed-of-light.456739/
- https://www.quora.com/Is-it-possibl...elerate-at-300-000-000m-s-2-for-half-a-second
- https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/101985/is-there-a-limit-to-acceleration#:~:text=Acceleration depends on velocity per,given time, acceleration is infinite.
I'll wait for his responseMFTL+ acceleration is a massive no-no. Don't believe me? Ask @DontTalkDT