There’s no way this is being misunderstood like this.
“It’s implied” Sounds like a massive Cope that you can’t provide direct evidence. Your “implications” are hilariously weak strings of headcanons that straight invent concepts that aren’t in Bleach. All of your arguments have been responded too. You can’t give any proof.
.Coolio?
Moyai emoticon
“It’s implied” Sounds like a massive Cope that you can’t provide direct evidence. Your “implications” are hilariously weak strings of headcanons that straight invent concepts that aren’t in Bleach. All of your arguments have been responded too. You can’t give any proof.Asking for statements is spoon feeding now
Uh sure. If you want to conclude our debate then sure. We’ve said our pieces, so okay.
.
When Aizen says power its really vague and we need additional context of what could mean. Power as I was always saying the capability to do something, for example, if I have a gun and I am pointing it to someone, that would mean that I have the power to kill someone, so in this instance, that means when Aizen says that humans get erased because of his power and then says that they will cease to exist, that would mean he has the capability to erase them from existence, and it still goes along nicely with the scans. Now its up to you to say that its raw power, which you can't because of a higher proponderence of evidence on my side.
Let's say for 1 quick second that Aizen's existence erasure is strength based and what you just said here is true, why doesn't erase everyone present? He is way stronger than all of them, but they don't get erased, which means that the existence erasure has a pre set range that can't be increased or decreased. Your arguments clearly aren't working, because it relies on headcanon. Now if you want, I can just go to the previous thread and respond to every detail of the argument.
Thing is, the OP changed nothing. You could read the OP and read the previous thread and everything gets addressed. It's more like, you're disagreeing with the last thread, but instead doing so in a new thread, without much to debunk any of it.I really really despise the “I don’t see anything new so I don’t have to respond to the arguments” stuff, despite this thread being a critique of the prior arguments against the OP. However, I think to make that extremely clear, I will copy paste the points of Damage’s old OP and address it directly. This way no lazy dismissal of our arguments can be employed under the guise of “I already addressed this last thread”. I’ll get to that in a bit
I really have to question if you actually read Arcker’s argumentation with this above comment. But as I said earlier, I’m going to copy paste the previous thread OP arguments into a response here, so there should be no excuse for dismissing the arguments I make in my next post.
Arcker123's arguments are hardly that new. His primary points are:
You're so intellectually Lazy it incredible. Refute the arguments, we've provided new justifications for why these claims are, nd i'm willing to bet you couldn't provide where some of this was brought up in the previous thread. This is getting ridiculous, pls read what we are saying to you and stop being lazy. It's also very ironic y'all are the same people saying stuff doesn't have to be spoon fed...
They weren’t close enough to get their entire body erased, hence why we see only part of them erased. Ofc there’d be blood if you had a hole open up in you…
No, if the “limited EE” is based on that scene?
That manga scan is part of it, but them being partially or fulled erased has nothing to do with it.
No, I meant, the “limited” part comes from the fact that this EE is only applied to weak spirits, aka humans. Which I found frustrating ngl..
I am bleach fan for over 10 years mate, read it whole like 5 times and watch it 5 times, it is my childhood anime, chill I aint biased
Cool I include that in what I should respond to
. He’s saying that this thread critiques what’s on profile, and it’s annoying for you to retreat to “well previous thread” instead of responding.
)
