- 8,159
- 2,185
If the Garganta collapses then everything would be gone which is counterintuitive to his goals.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well yeah it’s not a planet merge. He was going to merge both dimensions back to their original form. Life meaning the world of the living and death meaning the spiritual world.that is true but this is probably the author telling us what would happen and he did witness what happened when soul king died and he was with yoruichi who knows about the verse (probably learnt from urahara) as she explained the dangai and kyogokus to ichigo
and merging life and death cant simply mean the planets only as the two realms are seperated by another time space (dangai)
No because he was stated by Askin that he's going to collapse everything and create a new state of existence. Either way he's replicating the Soul King's universal split but in reverse.If the Garganta collapses then everything would be gone which is counterintuitive to his goals.
and this doesnt contradict anything as yhwach was going to reverse everything reio didganju didnt say it would collapse he said it would be gone
which could mean it would be merged with everything else thus creating 1 realm where life and death are mixed
and yukio can no longer hide in garganta as it is basically gone
Exactly my point. Yhwach should scale to whatever Soul King is treated as.No because he was stated by Askin that he's going to collapse everything and create a new state of existence. Either way he's replicating the Soul King's universal split but in reverse.
Running on the lines of this Soul Society and World of the Living are casually closed off by a separate spacetime, as per Isshin's quote that the Dangai is a separate spacetime from SS and WotL. So they are indeed separate from each other.I think the case for 3-A/High 3-A/2-C Bleach would be helped more by trying to establish that the living world and Soul Society are indeed separate Universes/space-times instead of getting into heated arguments about what words mean in regards to Muken.
I know that sounds persuasive to you, since you already believe it but "infinite hell" or "infinite darkness" is clearly hyperbole to me. Also arguing that every name is 100% literal is a very bad argument because then "Almighty" would make Yhwach omnipotentMuken should be infinite.Its name literally means infinite and Ichibe says everything in the SS(barring character names)were named by him and that names form the basic characteristic of everything.Then we have Unohana correlating the name to size,then Kenpachi’s says its an infinite hell and the the novels states it to be “infinite darkness”
i agree we should ignore infinite hell/darknessI know that sounds persuasive to you, since you already believe it but "infinite hell" or "infinite darkness" is clearly hyperbole to me. Also arguing that every name is 100% literal is a very bad argument because then "Almighty" would make Yhwach omnipotent
Considering Yhwach has the powers of the body, both arms, heart, and implied brain of the Soul King, (plus all the other absorbed powers) he is for all intents and purposes the Prime Soul King.Exactly my point. Yhwach should scale to whatever Soul King is treated as.
Destroying the Garganta should be rated at least twice that of destroying the realm of Soul Society since it houses SS and WotL and WotL is a parallel to SS. I know SS has a starry sky. Although Gremmy imagines a void of space with a galaxy, meaning he's at least seen galaxies before, so logically the realms likely contain galaxies.lets focus on 1 thing at a time
how about
first on the garganta thing and the rating it would give
then on muken?
Omnipotent could just mean super strong or strongest in the verse, in which I'd argue Yhwach is "Almighty" within his verse. Infinite on the other hand means infinite.I know that sounds persuasive to you, since you already believe it but "infinite hell" or "infinite darkness" is clearly hyperbole to me. Also arguing that every name is 100% literal is a very bad argument because then "Almighty" would make Yhwach omnipotent
If you want the Tiering to change, I don't really think it's relevant because Muken statements can be easily disregarded as hyperbolelets focus on 1 thing at a time
how about
first on the garganta thing and the rating it would give
then on muken?
Bro I’m only talking about those things which r named by Ichibe.The Almighty isn’t named by him but Muken is,which means Ichibe’s statement about names forming the basic characteristics of an object is only applicable on Muken not AlmightyI know that sounds persuasive to you, since you already believe it but "infinite hell" or "infinite darkness" is clearly hyperbole to me. Also arguing that every name is 100% literal is a very bad argument because then "Almighty" would make Yhwach omnipotent
it isnt a hyperbole when a in verse character acknowledges the reason as to why it is named what it isIf you want the Tiering to change, I don't really think it's relevant because Muken statements can be easily disregarded as hyperbole
The sword names are also not literal (in fact they are super metaphorical) so there goes thatBro I’m only talking about those things which r named by Ichibe.The Almighty isn’t named by him but Muken is,which means Ichibe’s statement about names forming the basic characteristics of an object is only applicable on Muken not Almighty
IIRC Ichibe just knows the names of Zanpakuto and didn't name every Zanpakuto. I know he named techniques like Shikai and Bankai.The sword names are also not literal (in fact they are super metaphorical) so there goes that
Connecting with size is not the same as being literally infinite. Just very very large. Also it's a scaling nightmare. If only an infinite space can withstand Kenpachi's full strength, then there's about 20 different characters that would end up getting High 3-A. Which I don't support at allit isnt a hyperbole when a in verse character acknowledges the reason as to why it is named what it is
and also connects the name to the size
An infinite space being able to contain Kenpachi's full strength means that Kenpachi is inherently less than infinity so it doesn't introduce any scaling issues. It just means there was no finite sized area in Soul Society that was big enough.Connecting with size is not the same as being literally infinite. Just very very large. Also it's a scaling nightmare. If only an infinite space can withstand Kenpachi's full strength, then there's about 20 different characters that would end up getting High 3-A. Which I don't support at all
Ichibe doesn’t name the swords.Thats Nimaiya’s job and by erasing the name of the sword also erases its ability which means that the ability relies on the name.The sword names are also not literal (in fact they are super metaphorical) so there goes that
It also means that Kenpachi is likely at least 3-A so there goes that. ****** Bazz B can be scaled to thisAn infinite space being able to contain Kenpachi's full strength means that Kenpachi is inherently less than infinity so it doesn't introduce any scaling issues. It just means there was no finite sized area in Soul Society that was big enough.
Ichibe’s statement further amplifies the argument so its good to bring it upi dont think we need to use ichibei (as that isnt a strong argument imo so we shouldnt focus on that )unohana statement is enough
it makes sense and doesnt contradict anything
If you have a scan of Ichibe saying he named Muken (specifically). I'd like to see itBro I’m only talking about those things which r named by Ichibe.The Almighty isn’t named by him but Muken is,which means Ichibe’s statement about names forming the basic characteristics of an object is only applicable on Muken not Almighty
let me give u an exampleConnecting with size is not the same as being literally infinite.
Not at all it just means they were taking maximum precautions to ensure Kenpachi didn't hurt anyone while training and Unohana states that Central 46 or the head captain gave the order.It also means that Kenpachi is likely at least 3-A so there goes that. ****** Bazz B can be scaled to this
Ichibe’s statement further amplifies the argument so its good to bring it up
Ichibe's statement is literally the only leg to stand on if you want to prove Muken is infinite. Because he actually does impart properties to what he names by the act of naming them. What Unohana said means jack shit. It is hyperbole by defaulti dont think we need to use ichibei (as that isnt a strong argument imo so we shouldnt focus on that )unohana statement is enough
it makes sense and doesnt contradict anything
Ichibe imparting properties onto the objects he names means Unohana's statement is not hyperbole by default.Ichibe's statement is literally the only leg to stand on if you want to prove Muken is infinite. Because he actually does impart properties to what he names by the act of naming them. What Unohana said means jack shit. It is hyperbole by default
Essentially infinite =/= actually infinitelet me give u an example
as the name of this thread suggests
this thread is supposed to be about how large mugen is
unohana did a similar thing
kubo couldve made her say "muken is an infinite space" but that can be considered a hyperbole
thus by making her say "as the name suggests it is essentially infinite"
gives it more support and shows the character is actually acknowledging why it is called muken and isnt just saying it is infinite just to say it is big
I haven't seen any proof yet that Ichibe personally named MukenIchibe imparting properties onto the objects he names means Unohana's statement is not hyperbole by default.
Essentially is defined as "the most fundamental aspect of an object being referred to" so it does mean actually infinite.Essentially infinite =/= actually infinite
There's your hyperbole
Also this thread is actually about changing character Tierings - that is the final objective
If you want the Tiering to change, I don't really think it's relevant because Muken statements can be easily disregarded as hyperbole
He named most things in SS.I haven't seen any proof yet that Ichibe personally named Muken
What Unohana said doesn't mean anythingand i think the ichibei argument isnt necessary unohana already is enough as i explained
Named "Most" things in SS isn't the same as "named Muken". It could very well be one of the things he didn't nameHe named most things in SS.
I disagree for reasons stated throughout this entire CRT.What Unohana said doesn't mean anything
I'd have to find the quote.Named "Most" things in SS isn't the same as "named Muken". It could very well be one of the things he didn't name