- 17,147
- 26,855
That didn't remotely help I'm still very confused because I never used the fire bending ship at all period in the 8-A calc so idk what you're taking about
Could you perhaps be referring to the water bender ship that fits 5 people
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That didn't remotely help I'm still very confused because I never used the fire bending ship at all period in the 8-A calc so idk what you're taking about
Oh that feat (that's 8-C) he whole point is that that's not a cylinder its got a third dimension as a wave that covered the entire length of the ship and pushed it we're only seeing one side of it there but when it pushes against the ship we see the water covers the entire top portion of the ship and pushes it so I used the length of the ship and a half cylinderThis value you found in you compilation
Use it as a minimum width for the ice structure
Then plug all that into this
Volume of an elliptic truncated cone Calculator
Calculates the volume, lateral area and surface area of an elliptic truncated cone given the lower and upper semi-axes and height.keisan.casio.com
Thats your new volume
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOh that feat (that's 8-C) he whole point is that that's not a cylinder its got a third dimension as a wave that covered the entire length of the ship and pushed it we're only seeing one side of it there but when it pushes against the ship we see the water covers the entire top portion of the ship and pushes it so I used the length of the ship and a half cylinder
The ship wouldn't be pushed and seperated the way it was if it was that shape and the water wouldn't cover as much of the top of the ship it did coming from that one spot when its shown to cover it all
This value you found in you compilation
Use it as a minimum width for the ice structure
Then plug all that into this
Volume of an elliptic truncated cone Calculator
Calculates the volume, lateral area and surface area of an elliptic truncated cone given the lower and upper semi-axes and height.keisan.casio.com
Thats your new volume
Ah okay I see what you mean then that was very confusing, I'll switch it up when I'm off overwatch, it honestly should still be 8-A tbhNOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Use the width of the ship you found on Katara's calc
Move it over to your water benders calc to use as the WIDTH of the ice structure, not the length. The length is correct
The ice structure is not cylindrical, as in they only rose the area of the ship which is shaped like an oval
You see what I mean?
Your calc uses a frustum (Which is correct) but it assumes the mass of ice is perfectly circular when looked at from above
When in reality it only needs to lift up the ship (which is ovular in shape) hence the structure would also be an oval
It's super easy to fix
just do what I said up here
I just did in in calculator it's now 41 tons per benderAh okay I see what you mean then that was very confusing, I'll switch it up when I'm off overwatch, it honestly should still be 8-A tbh
Based gameAh okay I see what you mean then that was very confusing, I'll switch it up when I'm off overwatch, it honestly should still be 8-A tbh
I just payed 20 for a brigette skin lolExcept for there monetization system
All I want is a decent Zen skin why do I got to pay 20$?
I'm only forking over my money for the OPM crossover and that's itI just payed 20 for a brigette skin lol
How'd you do this fix because there's no "width" portion for a truncated cone/frustrum as the volume formula is this:NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Use the width of the ship you found on Katara's calc
Move it over to your water benders calc to use as the WIDTH of the ice structure, not the length. The length is correct
The ice structure is not cylindrical, as in they only rose the area of the ship which is shaped like an oval
You see what I mean?
Your calc uses a frustum (Which is correct) but it assumes the mass of ice is perfectly circular when looked at from above
When in reality it only needs to lift up the ship (which is ovular in shape) hence the structure would also be an oval
It's super easy to fix
just do what I said up here
Use thisHow'd you do this fix because there's no "width" portion for a truncated cone/frustrum as the volume formula is this:
V = (1/3) * π * h * (r12 + r22 + (r1 * r2))
I still need the two base radius and top radius along with the height. So like is there an elliptical frustrum or something?
You forgot to half the diameter of the ship width for it's radiusDone
Using the updated Northern Water Tribe and mushroom cloud calcs Book One would be “8-B+, likely Low 7-C” and Book Two/Three would “8-A, likely Low 7-C”.snip
I would actually do something like thisUsing the updated Northern Water Tribe and mushroom cloud calcs Book One would be “8-B+, likely Low 7-C” and Book Two/Three would “8-A, likely Low 7-C”.
And Roku and the people who scale to Toph are just plain Low 7-C.
We can upscale the cast to baseline 8-B+Just 8-B now
What happened to "likely 7-C"?Using the updated Northern Water Tribe and mushroom cloud calcs Book One would be “8-B+, likely Low 7-C” and Book Two/Three would “8-A, likely Low 7-C”.
And Roku and the people who scale to Toph are just plain Low 7-C.
The 7-C calc still existI would actually do something like this
Book One - 8-B+, possibly Low 7-C
Book Two - 8-A+, possibly Low 7-C
Book Three - Low 7-C
For three I put Aang as Low 7-C because even though he was inferior, he was able to block and match Amped Ozai blow for blow
Toph, Boomi, Ozai, Iroh are all Low 7-C
My version of the Aang sand nuke fits more in line with the scaling chain I believeWhat happened to "likely 7-C"?
The PSI required to create 30 mph winds (What we see them affected by) is only 0.001102 bars@Shmeatywerbenmanjenson add the shockwave of the blast to your calc its still lowballed
No you add that to the blast for total energyThe PSI required to create 30 mph winds (What we see them affected by) is only 0.001102 bars
Using my first found distance of around 2 km
R^3*((27136*P+8649)^(1/2)/13568-93/13568)^2
2000^3*((27136*0.001102+8649)^(1/2)/13568-93/13568)^2 = 1.12134038894 tons (8-C)
So it wouldn't be an upgrade
Also I have a feeling that if mine is the one accepted it's gonna be the sand version of it, because it makes more sense both narratively and scaling wise
I don't think you do since the calculated energy is already higher than what is required to create a blastwave of that size and magnitudeNo you add that to the blast for total energy
Not it wouldn't its literally all the same one feat of shooting the mass into the air and creating the shockwave so itsI don't think you do since the calculated energy is already higher than what is required to create a blastwave of that size and magnitude
Adding them together would be like adding two different versions of a calc together to get a final value
Yeah Shmeaty; stop trying to lowball my boy smh. /s
Wouldn't it look bad if I suggest the higher end after already accepting the lower oneI mean technically it's Dale trying to do that
Use sand like I did and make it 7-BWouldn't it look bad if I suggest the higher end after already accepting the lower one
And nah 7-C pog more accurate
Therefir dusted me so that's whyUse sand like I did and make it 7-B
I legit wanna hear his reason why Sand is not acceptableTherefir dusted me so that's why
Idk bro I was told to use dust instead of sand I'd even argue 50/50 dust and sand is more accurate than just dustI legit wanna hear his reason why Sand is not acceptable