- 15,441
- 5,031
^Eficiente said:Is anybody going to remove the comments of this guy or what?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
^Eficiente said:Is anybody going to remove the comments of this guy or what?
^Antvasima said:Has this calculation been accepted by the calc group?
If so, you should probably ask Azathoth to comment here.
You can also find other staff members via the Knowledgeable Members List and the Kirby (Universe) page.
I actually meant your "arguments", those circle like arguments are destroying the thread.Somelatinguy said:Bump... What about this argumentation, which doesn't use the "Bigger on the Inside" argument?
... And yes, Kirby71, that's a good idea; comments making fun of an argument instead of actually refuting it should be deleted.
First off, how is "Bigger on the Inside" a circle-like argument? So far, it's never been debunked; rather, it's been only made fun of... Coments doing that would've to be deleted instead.Kirby71 said:I actually meant your "arguments", those circle like arguments are destroying the thread.
Also please listen to antvasima, we need Someone from calc group.
Wouldn't it be more logical to assume that they are just scaled down for cutscenes? Kirby is (at best) a little smaller than a human child, so representing something as big as a planet with any accuracy would be nigh-impossible if you wanted both Kirby and this planet-sized thing in the same cutscene. I think that would be better than assuming that each of Kirby's planets are like the Tardis. Plus, we see in the minigames like Megaton Punch planets like Popstar represented in a more accurate scale.usSomelatinguy said:Nobody would be dumb enough to believe that the planets are room-sized on both the outside and inside; the argument is that they're planet-sized on the inside.
Also, the moments in question are cutscenes.
... I hope everybody understands me now.
Well,there is also this information:AKM sama said:Is it stated that Pop Star is at the exact opposite end of the universe from where the feat happens?
Is there any other evidence which suggests a time frame of 6 seconds? Because going by just the cinematic timing is not reliable, there seems to be a screen-cut.
That's a possibility, but there are methods to depict planets as big as they are along with characters or other objects .Foggysniper said:Wouldn't it be more logical to assume that they are just scaled down for cutscenes? Kirby is (at best) a little smaller than a human child, so representing something as big as a planet with any accuracy would be nigh-impossible if you wanted both Kirby and this planet-sized thing in the same cutscene. I think that would be better than assuming that each of Kirby's planets are like the Tardis. Plus, we see in the minigames like Megaton Punch planets like Popstar represented in a more accurate scale.
Now, back to the main topic, with this again.Somelatinguy said:wall of text
>"done far away from the universe"Eficiente said:snip
Sorry, it's me who derailed this, but that can be fixed… I've decided to drop the "Bigger on the Inside" argument; not only is it hard to deduce, but also it has enough objections.Antvasima said:@Eficiente
So should we close this severely derailed thread?
Sorry, but the thread is already screwed up, better say "...due to the update the Game had today and the derailing this thread got, we should make a new thread"Eficiente said:There is important stuff to discuss due to the update the game had today, I would appreciate no more derail.