• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

All-purpose request thread (New forum)

No problem. 🙏
 
You are welcome, but I meant that it helps if you elaborate/explain more here, so we can help you better.
Well, the characters in question are called Homunculus, they are special monsters. One is male and is a attack-type monster and the other is female and is a suppor-type monster.
I was thinking of putting them both in the same profile as a species, but the two are different enough to have their own profile (And the profile will be full with the two together)
 
I support the closure, a new thread will be created, since the opposing party who wrote the message above could not refute the recent argument.
 
Don´t know if this is the place, but this match have been changed to be made inconclusive on purpose, which defy all logic of doing a match by setting specific conditions that nulls any type of debate
Isnt htis normal? I thought the OP can be changed to make the match work?
 
If nothing else it has made it come to my attention that more dishonest stuff was applied to the Garfield profile from the recent CRT than I had thought- I have removed the Social Influencing, as it was decided vague threats did not apply.

If the match proves to be spite, it is a rule violation. Currently it is poor sportsmanship and bad faith, but arguably not valid for removal.
 
Back
Top