- 8,510
- 1,847
Off-Topic but that also severely upgrade GT Pan's potential / power considering her feats against Baby & Oceanus.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yeah, but the thing is that the scans in the op suggest that gt is in the same timeline as superOmega, I think you can vary the cosmology of another timeline, like there are 18 Universes, another parallel world is just a void, there is still the void left by Zeno'oh in the other line of the time, according to the trunks theory, Universes with different history suggest different time streams as well as Universes
what is the evidence for that? also that wouldn't debunk gt being on the cannon timeline of events alongside superNot sure but Ik gt being in dr slump isn’t because it’s originally from that timeline an author avatar was making a GT character as explained here
what? That’s the scene in the Dr Slump mangayeah, but the thing is that the scans in the op suggest that gt is in the same timeline as super
what is the evidence for that? also that wouldn't debunk gt being on the cannon timeline of events alongside super
this is the argument it’s not the main one but it’s supporting evidence the rest of the evidence is in the opKoyamas author avatar cuts into Nakatsuru’s author avatar for getting side tracked and drawing GT in Dr Slump So the argument is that it's proof GT exists in the multiverse if author avatars from the main timeline are aware of it
and dr slump is in the same timeline as super, quote from the op "You read that right, Goku from Dragon Ball GT made an appearance in the official sequel to Arale, remembering that Arale shares the same world as Dragon Ball"what? That’s the scene in the Dr Slump manga
okay then, the timeline argument still prevails thothis is the argument it’s not the main one but it’s supporting evidence the rest of the evidence is in the op
Koyamas author avatar cuts into Nakatsuru’s author avatar for getting side tracked and drawing GT in Dr Slump So the argument is that it's proof GT exists in the multiverse if author avatars from the main timeline are aware of itand dr slump is in the same timeline as super, quote from the op "You read that right, Goku from Dragon Ball GT made an appearance in the official sequel to Arale, remembering that Arale shares the same world as Dragon Ball"
okay then, the timeline argument still prevails tho
Agree.@Stefano4444 Can I count on your vote and have things to add here?
ThanksAgree.
I don't want something that complicated, I just want the timeline of GT to be part of the canon, but without scaling anything to super, the cosmologies are different from each other
Hehehei know where these things lead
So do you agree?There is actually no primary canon source which says GT is an alternate timeline to Super. It's all based on WOG and there is no contradiction because THEY ARE DIFFERENT CONTINUITIES.
He agreesSo do you agree?
I'll put it hereHe agrees
Again, main point is that it isn't a serious moment, but a meta-ish gag.We will not merge, GT will be a separate line, like trunks.
no, look close dr slump and dbs are in the same timeline, and if the continuation of dr slump makes dbgt characters appear, then it means that in the future of dbs dbgt would happen since the future of dr slump is the future of dbs since both are in the same universe/timeline
and if there is an officcial placement of it in the timeline alongside dbs, i am not oposed to them being alternate timelines, it is just that this is not what the scans in the op suggests
I only have a 15 minute break (currently at work) so I'll make this quick....Koyamas author avatar cuts into Nakatsuru’s author avatar for getting side tracked and drawing GT in Dr Slump So the argument is that it's proof GT exists in the multiverse if author avatars from the main timeline are aware of it
i know where these things lead
Ok i concede on that point, but there is still the time placement argumentI only have a 15 minute break (currently at work) so I'll make this quick....
I could have addressed the entire matter from top to bottom but my attention is split between different tasks so Ill make this quick
In regards to DBGT. I would not say that they specifically share the same timeline with Dr. Slump, not in the way your thinking at least
Godofice basically said 10% of what I would have said had I had the full time
This scan here is all that is needed to make my point
Basically, All that happens and occurs in Dr. Slump is written to happen. Thats the nature of Dr. Slumps reality. DBGT existing was simply because the Author Avatars simply drew it to exist nothing more and nothing less. Its NOT because the Brief Returns chronologically flows into the DBGT timeline (even more so because Z-Timeline Goku and Goten made appearances in the chapters as well) but more so because the Author Avatars HAS the KNOWLEDGE of DBGT's world and simply drew it into being because they can which proves that Author Avatars of the Main timeline are aware of DBGT existence in the multiverse.
Parallel worlds with different events F.T timeline main timelinewank?
Ok i concede on that point, but there is still the time placement argument
That is not the argument, they are listed as if they were in the same timelineParallel worlds with different events F.T timeline main timeline
No they’re just listed as their canon the events in the dbs manga and dbs anime are different too it they’re both regarded as canon same ring beteThat is not the argument, they are listed as if they were in the same timeline
Time placement for what exactly?there is still the time placement argument
No they’re just listed as their canon the events in the dbs manga and dbs anime are different too it they’re both regarded as canon same ring bete
If it is only the manga, then the argument stays the same only now it is the manga canon
They’re just as canon timelines that’s the point of this thread it’s just listed as it’s canon which also explains dbs manga and dbs anime’s canonicity status they’re both canon but AU timelines same with Gt hereThat is not the argument, they are listed as if they were in the same timeline
If it is only the manga, then the argument stays the same only now it is the manga canon
It list dbs and dbgt as if they were in the same timelineDoesn’t this just prove what I just said?
Who knowsIt list dbs and dbgt as if they were in the same timeline
They just have it in the chronical events for canon like how db wiki does it where it shows the age for future trunks and one for main timelineIt list dbs and dbgt as if they were in the same timeline
Doesn’t matter not canonWho knows
Maybe at some point they plan to incorporate DBGT events into the DBS Timeline
If you look to the games then that Idea isn't too farfetched considering GT Goku knows Beerus in both XV and Fighterz and still speaks as if BoG events happened and he experienced them
Maybe at some point they plan to incorporate DBGT events into the DBS Timeline
If you look to the games then that Idea isn't too farfetched considering GT Goku knows Beerus in both XV and Fighterz and still speaks as if BoG events happened and he experienced them
they have it in the same "line" of events as dbs thoThey just have it in the chronical events for canon like how db wiki does it where it shows the age for future trunks and one for main timeline
Hehehe, just a few things that should have happened years ago here on the wiki and are now doing the right thing.oh my lord so many dragonball crt
Let me give an examplenot gonna lie, i would love that so much
they have it in the same "line" of events as dbs tho
yeah but in that case both timelines are "connected" via events in both of them, this can't be the case with gtLet me give an example
in age 779 in future trunks timeline he goes back into the past
in age 779 ROF takes place in the main timeline
The events happened in different timelines it would be the same thing here
Wdym by ”connected?” and why can’t it be the case with gtyeah but in that case both timelines are "connected" via events in both of them, this can't be the case with gt
events of one interfere in the other, so narratively speaking they are conected in the same "line" of eventsWdym by ”connected?”
if gt is an alternate timeline then it couldn't appear there since those events didn't interfered with super in everand why can’t it be the case with gt
I have 0 idea of what you’re talking about…events of one interfere in the other, so narratively speaking they are conected in the same "line" of events
if gt is an alternate timeline then it couldn't appear there since those events didn't interfered with super in ever
let us go simple then, as a narrative, the sequence of events of mirai trunks' timeline is connected to the main one, do you understand?I have 0 idea of what you’re talking about…
Who tf Is Mirai?? Im still confused asf on what ur implyinglet us go simple then, as a narrative, the sequence of events of mirai trunks' timeline is connected to the main one, do you understand?
future trunks, i am saying that the only reason the future/mirai trunks' timeline appears in the timeline of events in that other occasion is because both timelines' events are connected, which wouldn't be the case with gtWho tf Is Mirai?? Im still confused asf on what ur implying