• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

All-purpose request thread (New forum)

Mr._Bambu said:
You indeed cannot refute someone sticking their fingers in their ears and saying "la la la I CAN'T HEAR YOU LA LA LA".

I told you how the wiki handles shit like this, pointed out the example of light (it goes with other physical phenomenon too, of course- shockwaves/sonic booms, lightning, etc), and you just... whined. You objectively do not know how this wiki works if you're unaware of our procedures.

If you want a proper discussion, have one. If you want to learn, give it a good honest try. Might be fun, eh?

Edit: If you are interested in actually listening, I can happily reopen the thread. Or, if someone else is interested in discussing it, I'll also reopen it. As it stands, I don't intend to deal with it.
Click to expand...
You didn't refute what I said when I mentioned how the wiki treating light shouldn't mean we treat everything including particle beams the same way. There could also be other people interested in it. We can continue the discussion in that CRT
 
XXKINGXX69 said:
You didn't refute what I said when I mentioned how the wiki treating light shouldn't mean we treat everything including particle beams the same way. There could also be other people interested in it. We can continue the discussion in that CRT
Click to expand...
The wiki does do that. Your CRT is not of the scope to argue we ought to change how we treat more or less everything in this godforsaken hobby.

If someone's wanting that discussion, make a thread for it. Shan't clog this one up with more discussion, you know your options.
 
I am not involved here but would be better if you linked the policy you are referring to? Will make the discussion shorter and he may realize he is wrong when he sees the policy exists and you are only sharing it.

Again, I am not involved in a way, just out of curious
 
Dread said:
I am not involved here but would be better if you linked the policy you are referring to? Will make the discussion shorter and he may realize he is wrong when he sees the policy exists and you are only sharing it.

Again, I am not involved in a way, just out of curious
Click to expand...
It's less a broad policy and more the trait of the wiki itself. We do not hand out traits automatically because something is named, in this example, a photon beam, much like we do not assume something is light solely because it is presented as a laser nor do we assume everything named "black hole" bears the exact properties thereof. The conflict here is that King believes we do in fact do these things. Whether by lack of awareness of our standards or willful ignorance of them, it doesn't really matter.
 
Last edited:
Mr._Bambu said:
It's less a broad policy and more the trait of the wiki itself. We do not hand out traits automatically because something is named, in this example, a photon beam, much like we do not assume someone is light solely because it is presented as a laser nor do we assume everything named "black hole" bears the exact properties thereof. The conflict here is that King believes we do in fact do these things. Whether by lack of awareness of our standards or willful ignorance of them, it doesn't really matter.
Click to expand...
Thanks for clearing this out
 
Mr._Bambu said:
The wiki does do that. Your CRT is not of the scope to argue we ought to change how we treat more or less everything in this godforsaken hobby.

If someone's wanting that discussion, make a thread for it. Shan't clog this one up with more discussion, you know your options.
Click to expand...
Ok, then I'll make a new one with what you said in mind
 
Just_a_Random_Butler said:
Can I ask the reason for this request first?
Click to expand...
Dereck03 said:
Can you provide a reason of why they must have their name changes?
Click to expand...
:worried~1:
 
Dunk and Egg are the stories in which Duncan is the protagonist. Duncan does not appear in A Song of Ice and Fire, but in Dunk and Egg stories/Tales of Dunk and Egg.

The same for the Targaryens, Fire and Blood is the book that tells their stories in detail.
 
Uh... we only specify that a character comes from a particular work over their verse as a whole if there's other pages in the same verse that'd overlap otherwise or similar, as much as we don't label Naruto characters that debuted in Boruto as "(Boruto)".
 
Bobsican said:
as much as we don't label Naruto characters that debuted in Boruto as "(Boruto)".
Click to expand...
We write that on the profiles of ASOIAF so as not to confuse them with those of GOT.((well some characters from the books don't have profiles of their version of the show yet but it could happen in the future)
 
Ser_Hakim_Dayne said:
We write that on the profiles of ASOIAF so as not to confuse them with those of GOT.((well some characters from the books don't have profiles of their version of the show yet but it could happen in the future)
Click to expand...
That’s not really the same, A Song of Ice and Fire and Game of Thrones are technically separate franchises, they aren’t just installments in the same franchise like Fire and Blood and Dunk and Egg with ASoIaF.
 
Mr._Bambu said:
It's less a broad policy and more the trait of the wiki itself. We do not hand out traits automatically because something is named, in this example, a photon beam, much like we do not assume something is light solely because it is presented as a laser nor do we assume everything named "black hole" bears the exact properties thereof. The conflict here is that King believes we do in fact do these things. Whether by lack of awareness of our standards or willful ignorance of them, it doesn't really matter.
Click to expand...
I think you are looking for these pages:

vsbattles.fandom.com

Laser/Light Beam Dodging Feats

"Light" or "Laser" dodging is a fairly common trope seen in fiction and often the center of debate regarding characters' speeds, given that light is the fastest known thing in the real universe. This article will set forth the standards of this wiki in determining what is considered a real...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com

vsbattles.fandom.com

Black Hole Feats in Fiction

When it comes to the topic of black holes there are a lot of common misconceptions about their nature and through that also misconceptions about the evaluation of feats involving them. Generally, black holes are often depicted wrong in works of fiction. While a completely correct depiction can...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Antvasima
  • Sticky
Extremely important announcements for our community
Replies
31
Views
5K
Agnaa
Agnaa
AKM sama
New Staff Promotions
2
Replies
70
Views
8K
DarkDragonMedeus
DarkDragonMedeus
AKM sama
Super Moderator Promotions and New Staff Promotions
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
Greenshifter
Greenshifter
AKM sama
New Staff Promotions
2
Replies
69
Views
11K
GarrixianXD
GarrixianXD
  • Locked
VSBW, FC/OC and Joke Battles: A Few Questions For Staff
Replies
13
Views
1K
Mahek_The_Assassin_Silent_Killer
Back
Top