- 8,849
- 9,509
I know that. I'm just saying "intension" should never be used to justify an argument. Qawsed aadmitted there are contradictory things but chose author's intension over the actual show.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Alien X 3-A Downgrade
- Thread starter TauanVictor
- Start date
- Status
- 8,849
- 9,509
Why do Ant's arguments matter here and how does that make what I said wrong?
- 16,963
- 4,865
No offense but thats just more whataboutism. Dc and Marvel's cases don't effect Alien Xs, and if anything only puts the formers into question too.
- 168,536
- 77,318
I don't remember doing that, but we can talk about it via PMs if you wish.
- 168,536
- 77,318
But I linked to what Zamasu asked me to mention earlier.
- 20,607
- 17,607
I'm just going with the dialogue over the visuals of the scene. The dialogue seems rather consistent as with the sheer white void of the background, which is very different from how the normal universe is portrayed.
It's no more death of the author than our Bleach city sizes or taking Saiyan Saga Vegeta's statement at face value.
- 8,849
- 9,509
What about what I mentioned earlier? 3-A destruction with low 2-C creation for the Annihilargh.
- 15,602
- 22,921
Low 2-C seems kinda agreeable ngl
- 8,849
- 9,509
Why is everyone blindly agreeing to low 2-C without going over my points… like at all?
- 11,141
- 14,180
Mind quoting your points again? I thought this was only about Low 2-C creating and Alien X DNA can breach a field that was intended to protect from that Low 2-C creation blast wave.
- 8,849
- 9,509
Agnaa
VS Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Translation Helper
Human Resources
Gold Supporter
- 15,677
- 14,055
(Minor nitpick, but "death of the author" is a response to earlier artistic criticism, where it was believed that you had to understand the author to understand their art, "death of the author" argued that all that was important was the text. It only makes sense to use it to dismiss author statements. Trying to derive the author's intentions solely by looking at the work itself (what Qawsed was doing) is actually exactly what "death of the author" tells you to do.)
- 12,319
- 11,261
Agnaa spittin' over here.
- 8,849
- 9,509
- 16,963
- 4,865
On top of that, it was still established early that "tanking creation" isn't a thing.
So even if by chance the Creation is Low 2-C, scaling durability to it isn't quantifable.
So even if by chance the Creation is Low 2-C, scaling durability to it isn't quantifable.
- 11,141
- 14,180
I am not too sure on our standards on this myself.
- 168,536
- 77,318
- 168,536
- 77,318
Also, you should stop being disrespectful.Yes dear… one second.
- 5,554
- 2,329
I've read Zamasu Chan's arguments before. And as I said, I agree with their line of thinking. Mostly because of that clip I linked earlier.
- 7,638
- 7,806
Can you please elaborate on that? What conclusion is drawn from that scene you are referring to?
- 8,849
- 9,509
Oh sorry. I didn’t mean to come off as disrespectful. I was just disappointed that my arguments were mostly glossed over.
- 10,398
- 4,564
That was a clip of the view of the universe, which contains a multiverse, from the outside. I don’t see how this affects anything.
- 31,648
- 34,701
I still agree with Firestorm here.
- 540
- 867
- 16,963
- 4,865
Well we don't know yet since we still have to settle on the downgrade or not. Most here are still in favor of it.
- 16,963
- 4,865
Not all are.
- 6,029
- 3,530
a sample of his DNA did, and it should be around equal to alien x himself
it also cut the forcefield like butter
- 8,849
- 9,509
Ben did indeed use Alien X’s power to breach the force field. However, due to the Big Bang being a creation feat, and the ship being undamaged by things far less than low 2-C, the Big Bang has no low 2-C force behind it.
- Status
Similar threads
