- 15,393
- 22,288
What? Why assume it didn’t hit opponents that were standing in place?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You believe it hit all of them? We don't know who hit who.
Actually how the hell did they survive
2 of them are star level
1 is solar system
1 is universe
While Piccolo and Gohan are both universe yet did nothing to the far weaker ones.
This scene is PIS.
Ki sword is not the same technique as kienzan. Despite being energy, similar looking attacks and techniques can behave differently. It is absolutely not negating durability because it cannot harm much stronger opponents, it just has a higher AP to harm stronger opponents.Ki swords work using the same concept but don't nearly do the same thing as the kienzan, that should be removed and replaced by dura neg , the verse threats it as such , it has a direct statement frim the author and the only anti-feat it has is non canon
Krillin vs Frieza?It is absolutely not negating durability because it cannot harm much stronger opponents, it just has a higher AP to harm stronger opponents.
Please check out all the previous threads regarding the topic.
We simply don't see it hit anyone, if your only argument against it being dura neg is an ambiguous shit where it may or may not have hit anyone then you know you're on the wrong side .What? Why assume it didn’t hit opponents that were standing in place?
Jiren literally caught it with bare hands.Krillin vs Frieza?
I know about the other threads , i disagree with them , wouldn't be here if i thought the was it was handled was right .Ki sword is not the same technique as kienzan. Despite being energy, similar looking attacks and techniques can behave differently. It is absolutely not negating durability because it cannot harm much stronger opponents, it just has a higher AP to harm stronger opponents.
Please check out all the previous threads regarding the topic.
Because it's not kienzan, duh. If a ki sword was that effective, Krillin would have used a ki sword and not a disc technique. The point remains, kienzan does not negate durability as stronger characters can be unharmed by it. There is no proof of it being dura negating. It is just a technique that can harm stronger opponents and that's all. Claiming it's dura neg is exaggeration with no strong basis.Why are ki sword any different ?
And Frieza got he's tail cut off and was about to be cut in half.Jiren literally caught it with bare hands.
Piercing Damage, debunk this before you claim anything about Dura NegTechnically wasn't it base form Vegeta that tanked Genkidama??
I mean if that guy survived Genkidama....and survived beat up from KKX4 Goku....then Oozaru Vegeta taking conscious precautions in dodging Kienzan says it alll.....that it is Dura Neg....
Unless you want to end up with Kienzan>>>>>>Genkidama in AP
All the reasons that point to it being an attack capable of damaging much stronger opponents, yes. And there is also evidence of it not being dura neg because it fails to do any damage to a much stronger opponent. That's why the profile notes it as having higher AP.And Frieza got he's tail cut off and was about to be cut in half.
Nappa almost got decapitated.
Vegeta had to dodge it.
Even Goku got cut by it.
Also it was Great Ape vegeta that had to dodge a attack from a weaken Krillin. The same Vegeta that survived a Spirit Bomb
Piercing damage or not narrative wise Kienzan having so much tactical and "AP" superiority over Genkidama is wrong on every lvl...Piercing Damage, debunk this before you claim anything about Dura Neg
We don’t visibly see the hit =/= it didn’t occur. Give me an alternative explanation for how an attack somehow missed all of them while they were standing still, otherwise Occam's razor favors the interpretation that they simply got hit and weren’t affected.We simply don't see it hit anyone, if your only argument against it being dura neg is an ambiguous shit where it may or may not have hit anyone then you know you're on the wrong side .
We already explained above why it just having higher AP due to piercing damage doesn't work when similar techniques from from faaaar superior characters don't even have the same effect , the fact that Ki swords exist proves that it's not just higher AP
Pray tell which opponents??And there is also evidence of it not being dura neg because it fails to do any damage to a much stronger opponent
Dude play the scene in 0,5 speed and you'll see that the only attacks that hit them are gohan's ki blast and roshi's kamehameha, it's as simple as that , you don't need Occam's razor for this .We don’t visibly see the hit =/= it didn’t occur. Give me an alternative explanation for how an attack somehow missed all of them while they were standing still, otherwise Occam's razor favors the interpretation that they simply got hit and weren’t affected.
It’s not vague, it’s pretty obvious what the scene is trying to convey.
Okay tell him to try and do the same to his headDoes Yajirobe have Durability Negation too?
Isn't the saiyans tail treated as severe weakness , even for ones who have trained it??Does Yajirobe have Durability Negation too?
Ohh youuIsn't the saiyans tail treated as severe weakness , even for ones who have trained it??
Even analyzing this in vaccum....thats just feat for Yajirobe's sword.....I have no problem with Dura Neg for him.....
Can you not read the thread or?Pray tell which opponents??
no need to be rudeCan you not read the thread or?
the only canon case of it failing is against jiren , but then again that's jiren and he hit the sides anywayPray tell which opponents??
Regardless of it dura neg or not, it still works on opponents a million times stronger than them. They literally should be spamming it, Krillin does to an extent, yet they don’t for the same reason they don’t spam ki blades, it’s probably not fun to win that way or something?Then i still don't know why Goku and Krillin just spam it whenever a battle take place to Dura Neg the hell out of their opponents
That could work, although it should probably be relative to the person who’s using it, his power. So it‘d always be a few million times more powerful than the rating we have said person at at any given time.Could probably be treated similarly to Wolverine's claws in that they're just given an AP rating up to the maximum thing they harmed but not complete durability negation.
Though I'm neutral overall and either could work.
This is false, it can be dura neg on it’s sharp edge and not on the side. That way it doesn’t contradict anything, or at least nothing that’s 100% clear.It is Piercing Damage, cause what, if it is truly Dura Neg, Jiren can't hold or physically punch it, and it will not be easily detonated by a casual ki blast when Goku train with Krillin on a rooftop pre-ToP
Yeah this exactly ,because then the same multiplier can be used for other users of Kienzan...That could work, although it should probably be relative to the person who’s using it, his power. So it‘d always be a few million times more powerful than the rating we have said person at at any given time.
Just because it didn't happen doesn't mean I cant use it because these instances explains the mechanics of Kienzan which is what this thread is concerned about.If it would have happened in manga,it would be same as in the anime ie Cell tanking Krillin Kienzan and Gohan tanking Cell's KienzamSo yeah again use something that didn't happen.
Jiren is the only one in canon that took it head on. I didn't know we use one feat over X others. I already proven why Maverick doesn't work.
He isn't Low 2-C until he fights Jiren head on which is after his Kienzan scene where he isn't Low 2-C as he got stomped by same Jiren 1 episode backLow 2C as a SSB. He uses as he's Blue. Nothing on he's page says before powering up or anything.
Ok so you can't prove me wrong.
The Kienzan works the SAME in Toei as it does in manga.Same Nappa dodging Kienzan,Vegeta jumping from Kienzan,Frieza dodging Kienzan is there in anime.Manga having no scenes doesn't automatically make Toei scenes invalid when the mechanics of Kienzan is the same,it just didn't happen in the manga.Also Jiren punching Kienzan and throwing it back exists which Toei scenes just supportsCan we stop using Toei to prove a point? The manga has no such scenes. It's clear as day how Toriyama tried to portray the Kienzan; as an attack that cuts any opponent regardless of their strength. And that's exactly what it has done in the manga.
But Jiren literally holds the blade from the side and throws it back..heck he even punches the blades on the edges though.....This is false, it can be dura neg on it’s sharp edge and not on the side. That way it doesn’t contradict anything, or at least nothing that’s 100% clear.
Not really because you're ignoring how big of an assumption it is that Krillin just multiplied his PL by multiple millions without any charge up nor anyone with a scouter or ki sensing ever mentioning it or reacting to it the same way they reacted to any such jump in PL when even all the way to DBS, everyone always commented on Piccolo's makankōsappō.Again....assuming that its negating the durability in order to hit stronger opponent takes more assumption than it simply having more AP hence it hiting the stronger opponent.Even Occam's razor doesn't support durability negation due to the principle of making more assumption
You don't know how attacks work in DB. Goku's kamehameha is directly shown to double his PL while he use it, same for Piccolo's makankōsappō. When you charge up an attack in DB, your power level jump proportionaly to the same level as the attack. Only exception is the genkidama because the energy doesn't come from you and doesn't enter your body either.It doesn't multiply their PL, what? The attacks themselves are just stronger. That's the whole point of things like Goku using a condensed ball of Ki in his hand to punch Zamasu with. It's significantly stronger than him.
This, plus it being specifically designed to CUT things, can definitely solidify higher AP.
There is no 'physicaly' in DBZ, it's all ki. When Radditz use his scouter on Goku and Piccolo, he say 'Goku's power level jumped to 920!' not 'His power level is still the same and there's now a signal from between his hands that's at 920!'. Until the ki is released into the attack, it's still in your body doing ki things like usual.Yes, the power level of your condensed, focused ki is higher than your power level. That's pretty easy to deduce.
Where on earth did you get that stuff about them being physically way stronger when they condensed and focused their ki on a single point?