• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

About the Kienzan

Status
Not open for further replies.
Also as I said earlier

You believe it hit all of them? We don't know who hit who.

Actually how the hell did they survive
2 of them are star level
1 is solar system
1 is universe

While Piccolo and Gohan are both universe yet did nothing to the far weaker ones.
This scene is PIS.
 
Ki swords work using the same concept but don't nearly do the same thing as the kienzan, that should be removed and replaced by dura neg , the verse threats it as such , it has a direct statement frim the author and the only anti-feat it has is non canon
Ki sword is not the same technique as kienzan. Despite being energy, similar looking attacks and techniques can behave differently. It is absolutely not negating durability because it cannot harm much stronger opponents, it just has a higher AP to harm stronger opponents.

Please check out all the previous threads regarding the topic.
 
It is absolutely not negating durability because it cannot harm much stronger opponents, it just has a higher AP to harm stronger opponents.

Please check out all the previous threads regarding the topic.
Krillin vs Frieza?

Also I'll try find the old ones
 
What? Why assume it didn’t hit opponents that were standing in place?
We simply don't see it hit anyone, if your only argument against it being dura neg is an ambiguous shit where it may or may not have hit anyone then you know you're on the wrong side .

We already explained above why it just having higher AP due to piercing damage doesn't work when similar techniques from from faaaar superior characters don't even have the same effect , the fact that Ki swords exist proves that it's not just higher AP
 
But the thing is if it was just AP then it doesn't just partially slash into the opponent who are technically even stronger than the technique.....they get cut clean through without resistance.

Also then Jiren and SSB Goku contradicts it....even though Jiren is stronger....they are not that far apart like Krillin and Frieza.....yet Jiren shatters them....which would imply Jiren has that much more AP compared to SSB Goku.

So you can't have your cake and eat it too....
 
Ki sword is not the same technique as kienzan. Despite being energy, similar looking attacks and techniques can behave differently. It is absolutely not negating durability because it cannot harm much stronger opponents, it just has a higher AP to harm stronger opponents.

Please check out all the previous threads regarding the topic.
I know about the other threads , i disagree with them , wouldn't be here if i thought the was it was handled was right .

Why are ki sword any different ? You said yourself that it's special because it focuses on dealing cutting damage , same concept as the Ki swords , literally no difference
 
Why are ki sword any different ?
Because it's not kienzan, duh. If a ki sword was that effective, Krillin would have used a ki sword and not a disc technique. The point remains, kienzan does not negate durability as stronger characters can be unharmed by it. There is no proof of it being dura negating. It is just a technique that can harm stronger opponents and that's all. Claiming it's dura neg is exaggeration with no strong basis.

Here are the previous threads where it was discussed and the current addition was made in Krillin's and the other's pages:
 
It is Piercing Damage, cause what, if it is truly Dura Neg, Jiren can't hold or physically punch it, and it will not be easily detonated by a casual ki blast when Goku train with Krillin on a rooftop pre-ToP
 
Technically wasn't it base form Vegeta that tanked Genkidama??

I mean if that guy survived Genkidama....and survived beat up from KKX4 Goku....then Oozaru Vegeta taking conscious precautions in dodging Kienzan says it alll.....that it is Dura Neg....

Unless you want to end up with Kienzan>>>>>>Genkidama in AP
Piercing Damage, debunk this before you claim anything about Dura Neg
 
And Frieza got he's tail cut off and was about to be cut in half.

Nappa almost got decapitated.

Vegeta had to dodge it.

Even Goku got cut by it.

Also it was Great Ape vegeta that had to dodge a attack from a weaken Krillin. The same Vegeta that survived a Spirit Bomb
All the reasons that point to it being an attack capable of damaging much stronger opponents, yes. And there is also evidence of it not being dura neg because it fails to do any damage to a much stronger opponent. That's why the profile notes it as having higher AP.
 
We simply don't see it hit anyone, if your only argument against it being dura neg is an ambiguous shit where it may or may not have hit anyone then you know you're on the wrong side .

We already explained above why it just having higher AP due to piercing damage doesn't work when similar techniques from from faaaar superior characters don't even have the same effect , the fact that Ki swords exist proves that it's not just higher AP
We don’t visibly see the hit =/= it didn’t occur. Give me an alternative explanation for how an attack somehow missed all of them while they were standing still, otherwise Occam's razor favors the interpretation that they simply got hit and weren’t affected.

It’s not vague, it’s pretty obvious what the scene is trying to convey.
 
Does Yajirobe have Durability Negation too?
image0.webp
 
We don’t visibly see the hit =/= it didn’t occur. Give me an alternative explanation for how an attack somehow missed all of them while they were standing still, otherwise Occam's razor favors the interpretation that they simply got hit and weren’t affected.

It’s not vague, it’s pretty obvious what the scene is trying to convey.
Dude play the scene in 0,5 speed and you'll see that the only attacks that hit them are gohan's ki blast and roshi's kamehameha, it's as simple as that , you don't need Occam's razor for this .

We aren't assuming anything, it literally didn't hit anyone
 
Then i still don't know why Goku and Krillin just spam it whenever a battle take place to Dura Neg the hell out of their opponents
Regardless of it dura neg or not, it still works on opponents a million times stronger than them. They literally should be spamming it, Krillin does to an extent, yet they don’t for the same reason they don’t spam ki blades, it’s probably not fun to win that way or something?
 
Could probably be treated similarly to Wolverine's claws in that they're just given an AP rating up to the maximum thing they harmed but not complete durability negation.

Though I'm neutral overall and either could work.
That could work, although it should probably be relative to the person who’s using it, his power. So it‘d always be a few million times more powerful than the rating we have said person at at any given time.
 
That could work, although it should probably be relative to the person who’s using it, his power. So it‘d always be a few million times more powerful than the rating we have said person at at any given time.
Yeah this exactly ,because then the same multiplier can be used for other users of Kienzan...
 
So yeah again use something that didn't happen.

Jiren is the only one in canon that took it head on. I didn't know we use one feat over X others. I already proven why Maverick doesn't work.
Just because it didn't happen doesn't mean I cant use it because these instances explains the mechanics of Kienzan which is what this thread is concerned about.If it would have happened in manga,it would be same as in the anime ie Cell tanking Krillin Kienzan and Gohan tanking Cell's Kienzam

Only one in canon that took head on doesn't mean others cant,Toei anime shows it that characters with sufficient high PL can tank Kienzan no problem and Kienzan works the same in anime as it does in manga.What using 1 feat over x others? I saw your comment now and you just called it PIS,forgetting the fact that they can simply hold back their strength
Low 2C as a SSB. He uses as he's Blue. Nothing on he's page says before powering up or anything.

Ok so you can't prove me wrong.
He isn't Low 2-C until he fights Jiren head on which is after his Kienzan scene where he isn't Low 2-C as he got stomped by same Jiren 1 episode back

I can,I already thought of a example which doesn't follow your rule but increases AP but I dont have to show it because you have yet to prove that they need to follow the rules you made in order to show increase in AP.
Can we stop using Toei to prove a point? The manga has no such scenes. It's clear as day how Toriyama tried to portray the Kienzan; as an attack that cuts any opponent regardless of their strength. And that's exactly what it has done in the manga.
The Kienzan works the SAME in Toei as it does in manga.Same Nappa dodging Kienzan,Vegeta jumping from Kienzan,Frieza dodging Kienzan is there in anime.Manga having no scenes doesn't automatically make Toei scenes invalid when the mechanics of Kienzan is the same,it just didn't happen in the manga.Also Jiren punching Kienzan and throwing it back exists which Toei scenes just supports
This is false, it can be dura neg on it’s sharp edge and not on the side. That way it doesn’t contradict anything, or at least nothing that’s 100% clear.
But Jiren literally holds the blade from the side and throws it back..heck he even punches the blades on the edges though.....
 
Again....assuming that its negating the durability in order to hit stronger opponent takes more assumption than it simply having more AP hence it hiting the stronger opponent.Even Occam's razor doesn't support durability negation due to the principle of making more assumption
 
Again....assuming that its negating the durability in order to hit stronger opponent takes more assumption than it simply having more AP hence it hiting the stronger opponent.Even Occam's razor doesn't support durability negation due to the principle of making more assumption
Not really because you're ignoring how big of an assumption it is that Krillin just multiplied his PL by multiple millions without any charge up nor anyone with a scouter or ki sensing ever mentioning it or reacting to it the same way they reacted to any such jump in PL when even all the way to DBS, everyone always commented on Piccolo's makankōsappō.
 
It doesn't multiply their PL, what? The attacks themselves are just stronger. That's the whole point of things like Goku using a condensed ball of Ki in his hand to punch Zamasu with. It's significantly stronger than him.

This, plus it being specifically designed to CUT things, can definitely solidify higher AP.
 
And how do they become stronger??
Why shouldn't Kienzan maintain same amount of relative power difference compared to Krillin no matter how strong he is??
 
It doesn't multiply their PL, what? The attacks themselves are just stronger. That's the whole point of things like Goku using a condensed ball of Ki in his hand to punch Zamasu with. It's significantly stronger than him.

This, plus it being specifically designed to CUT things, can definitely solidify higher AP.
You don't know how attacks work in DB. Goku's kamehameha is directly shown to double his PL while he use it, same for Piccolo's makankōsappō. When you charge up an attack in DB, your power level jump proportionaly to the same level as the attack. Only exception is the genkidama because the energy doesn't come from you and doesn't enter your body either.

That's also why you can't just attack someone while they are charging unless they are an absolute non-threat to you.
 
Yes, the power level of your condensed, focused ki is higher than your power level. That's pretty easy to deduce.

Where on earth did you get that stuff about them being physically way stronger when they condensed and focused their ki on a single point?
 
Yes, the power level of your condensed, focused ki is higher than your power level. That's pretty easy to deduce.

Where on earth did you get that stuff about them being physically way stronger when they condensed and focused their ki on a single point?
There is no 'physicaly' in DBZ, it's all ki. When Radditz use his scouter on Goku and Piccolo, he say 'Goku's power level jumped to 920!' not 'His power level is still the same and there's now a signal from between his hands that's at 920!'. Until the ki is released into the attack, it's still in your body doing ki things like usual.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top