• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

4-B Kaguya (this is useless and I'm wasting my time 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Did Damage post his debunk?
Not a debunk exactly; I just didn't think there was a solid basis for Kaguya's ETSO to have the same "chakra density" as the Truth-Seeking Orbs created by Naruto & Obito. Obito showed the ability to greatly increase the size of his TSO's with the constructs he created without any suggestion that he was making them massively more powerful as a result. Kaguya expanding the size of her ETSO doesn't necessarily imply that she's putting in proportional amounts of chakra to volume every second, and that she'd do this for 15 years straight consistently. It seems to me that the method in the OP depends on some generous assumptions.
 
I don't think there's a rule like that. The minimum is 2 votes and it should be in the majority to get approved. There's no rule that states there has to be a 2 point lead. Unless I'm mistaken.
2 is the bare minimum for non controversial changes. A change with staff disapproval imo doesn't fall under that category.
 
2 is the bare minimum for non controversial changes. A change with staff disapproval imo doesn't fall under that category.
Well I don't think 1 staff disagreement makes this controversial and I've seen other CRTs pass through without a 2 point difference, but as you wish.
 
Not a debunk exactly; I just didn't think there was a solid basis for Kaguya's ETSO to have the same "chakra density" as the Truth-Seeking Orbs created by Naruto & Obito. Obito showed the ability to greatly increase the size of his TSO's with the constructs he created without any suggestion that he was making them massively more powerful as a result. Kaguya expanding the size of her ETSO doesn't necessarily imply that she's putting in proportional amounts of chakra to volume every second, and that she'd do this for 15 years straight consistently. It seems to me that the method in the OP depends on some generous assumptions.
I mean the nonuboku sword is actually massively stronger than his other balls
 
I think there is a problem with the calc. We have already seen inside of a ball and it was empty. Most likely explanation is that energy is stored in the surface layer. But if that is the case then surface area should be used instead of the volume.
 
I think there is a problem with the calc. We have already seen inside of a ball and it was empty. Most likely explanation is that energy is stored in the surface layer. But if that is the case then surface area should be used instead of the volume.
When did we see the inside?
 
I mean the nonuboku sword is actually massively stronger than his other balls
The bigger issue is that it's not an assumption that Kaguya doesn't make her balls bigger by stretching them.
It's an assumption to say she does. The entire argument is just making a claim and trying to shift the burden of proof to me.

Imagine I tried to use Damages interpretation that Kaguya stretches out the TSO to destroy the dimension to calculate the KE of it. I would get hit with "prove Kaguya moves the TSO and doesn't just expand it like the name implies".

The argument is the same as if we saw someone destroy a planet and said "well you can't prove the planets wasn't made out of cotton candy so you can't say destroying it is planet level"
 
Like I already said before. The ability is called EXPANSIVE Truth Seeking orb. It's stated to be identical to the TSO behind Naruto (which are not stretched out), just bigger. Its stated that it's "expanding mass is filled to the brim". It's stated it contains the power to turn the dimension into nothing.
All of these statements directly imply if not outright prove the balls density stays the same.

Meanwhile there's literally no implication that Kaguya directly changes the shape of the ball and either moves it around or just stretches it out to achieve the dimensions destruction. That is a completely baseless assumption that doesn't require counter evidence to prove wrong simply because there's no evidence implying it's true to begin with
 
Bump
its-been-so-long-the-man-behind-the-slaughter.gif
 
I see that this could be useful, but the 4-C that we have for Kaguya would be like the creation of a dimension with a star, while the 4-B would be total destruction

Although it would still seem a bit exaggerated to me that the Gudoudama is 4-B (Although the method convinces me too much :'v)
 
I see that this could be useful, but the 4-C that we have for Kaguya would be like the creation of a dimension with a star, while the 4-B would be total destruction

Although it would still seem a bit exaggerated to me that the Gudoudama is 4-B (Although the method convinces me too much :'v)
?. 4B is not an exaggeration.
 
I'll switch to neutral. I'm not stubborn enough to be the lone dissension if multiple staff members think that this is valid.

You can apply it.

Though I may revisit it at a future date if I discover a better alternative.
Great, thank you for being reasonable.

Now what I need is someone to open Kaguya's profile for me real quick 🙏
 
Sup slayer, have you decided on your vote?
I'm tentatively fine with it, I think.

I'm not like totally 1000% convinced, but I don't really have any true argument against this either. So, given that I have no real reason to disagree, I guess I gotta agree lol.

We have a known energy value for the standard TSB. We know the ETSB is X-times bigger. We know it expands, doesn't stretch. And there's no reason to assume its density or composition are different, really. So yeah.

The only thing I actually disagree with is the 'Energy/second' value, but that wasn't really introduced in this thread, so I won't waste time on it.
 
Aight bet
Based on my personal beliefs one our standards for feats like this and the context of Naruto scaling, I agree with the OP.
I'll switch to neutral. I'm not stubborn enough to be the lone dissension if multiple staff members think that this is valid.

You can apply it.

Though I may revisit it at a future date if I discover a better alternative.
I'm tentatively fine with it, I think.

I'm not like totally 1000% convinced, but I don't really have any true argument against this either. So, given that I have no real reason to disagree, I guess I gotta agree lol.

We have a known energy value for the standard TSB. We know the ETSB is X-times bigger. We know it expands, doesn't stretch. And there's no reason to assume its density or composition are different, really. So yeah.

The only thing I actually disagree with is the 'Energy/second' value, but that wasn't really introduced in this thread, so I won't waste time on it.
Thank you all for your valuable input. I really appreciate it, knowing how busy everyone is. David, there’s your answer—we’ve achieved success!
Thus, this was not useless and you didn’t waste your time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top