Hi Ultima.
There are some criticisms of modal realism that modal realism postulates an excessive number of objects - an infinite number of possible worlds - leading to an unnecessarily large ontology that violates Occam's razor, which favors simpler theories with fewer objects. What do you think about this? I asked this question elsewhere, but I want to hear your perspective on it.
There are some criticisms of modal realism that modal realism postulates an excessive number of objects - an infinite number of possible worlds - leading to an unnecessarily large ontology that violates Occam's razor, which favors simpler theories with fewer objects. What do you think about this? I asked this question elsewhere, but I want to hear your perspective on it.
