Forthegood
He/Him- 260
- 242
Thanks for pointing that out. Howevers, the slight wording difference doesn’t really change anything ig?You're adding an extra 's' that doesnt exist here.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks for pointing that out. Howevers, the slight wording difference doesn’t really change anything ig?You're adding an extra 's' that doesnt exist here.
You haven't demonstrated how or why the evidence is ineffective beyond briefly calling it 'weak,'
Apologies. I was speaking colloquially when I say "layer of reality."If it refers to a layer of reality, it isn't High 1-B. And I've already pointed out that the statement itself uses both terms to refer to the same thing. The aliens describe themselves as being from an "incalculable dimension," and this incalculable dimension is "a glorious universe." So even the attempted appeal to some kind of consistent overarching terminology (Which I doubt exists) fails in its own terms.
I'll wait for said details.Currently away from home. I'll have more details later.
And the statment that gives a possibility for their "inaclcuable dimension" to be a universe is also a seperate sentence from inaclcuable dimension sentence ?The aliens being higher-dimensional based on independent pieces of evidence doesn't really change anything. They can be higher-dimensional all they want, and the statement still isn't High 1-B because that reading of the text is not necessary nor even possible.
It’s talking about same thing. It’s like if I said “I came from a giant dimension. A large planet that no man ever saw before”. Here dimension clearly refers to planet. Same thing there, but with “incalculable dimension” and “glorious universe” instead.And the statment that gives a possibility for their "inaclcuable dimension" to be a universe is also a seperate sentence from inaclcuable dimension sentence ?
And the statment that gives a possibility for their "inaclcuable dimension" to be a universe is also a seperate sentence from inaclcuable dimension sentence ?
We have already reached 14 pages, let the staffs handleIt’s talking about same thing. It’s like if I said “I came from a giant dimension. A large planet that no man ever saw before”. Here dimension clearly refers to planet. Same thing there, but with “incalculable dimension” and “glorious universe” instead.
"The incalculable dimension" , "higher breadth and functionality" etc , all were actually explaining nature of that universe so it can't be linked this wayIt’s talking about same thing. It’s like if I said “I came from a giant dimension. A large planet that no man ever saw before”. Here dimension clearly refers to planet. Same thing there, but with “incalculable dimension” and “glorious universe” instead.
"The incalculable dimension" , "higher breadth and functionality" etc , all were actually explaining nature of that universe so it can't be linked this way
We have already reached 14 pages, let the staffs handle
Can you reiterate your initial question for the current case so I can better address the concerns?I'll wait for said details.
The evidence is just thoroughly insufficient overall. There is an appeal to an alleged consistent overarching terminology in Ben 10 where "Dimension" refers to axes as distinct from "Universe," but that fails because this case in specific is one where the two terms are being used interchangeably to refer to the same thing, since the "incalculable dimension" is just the place the aliens come from.Is it in regard to the usage of the verbiage in this specific case?
Okay, so what you would like us to provide is more examples of the distinction within the storyline?The evidence is just thoroughly insufficient overall. There is an appeal to an alleged consistent overarching terminology in Ben 10 where "Dimension" refers to axes as distinct from "Universe," but that fails because this case in specific is one where the two terms are being used interchangeably to refer to the same thing, since the "incalculable dimension" is just the place the aliens come from.
After that, there's an attempt to say that it doesn't really matter if "dimension" is being used in reference to place, which I address here.
unless im missing somethingSo my position of disagreeing with the upgrade is unchanged.
That was an earlier message.Why does OP say Qawsed agrees with High 1-B
unless im missing something
That wouldn't change much, no, since the specific quote that's of interest to us here is treating dimension and universe as interchangeable terms for the same thing anyway. So, overall: Have you any counterpoints to the objections I've raised?Okay, so what you would like us to provide is more examples of the distinction within the storyline?
To clarify, the current concern is the statement allegedly using them as interchangeable terms?That wouldn't change much, no, since the specific quote that's of interest to us here is treating dimension and universe as interchangeable terms for the same thing anyway. So, overall: Have you any counterpoints to the objections I've raised?
"I am from an incalculable country. A glorious continent" makes sense as a sentence if:Also, using two terms to say where they are from doesn't mean they are in the same scope.
An analogy would be:
We are beings from
- an incalculable "country"
- A glorious "continent"
What I’m not getting is why you don’t consider the incalculable dimension to refer to a mathematical one when the alternative interpretation of it referring to a universe doesn’t make sense.since then "Incalculable dimension" and "Glorious universe" would be conceded as referring to the exact same thing
Considering we have Cosmic Mom's statement of visiting to "lower dimensions" which were contextualized as spatial.What I’m not getting is why you don’t consider the incalculable dimension to refer to a mathematical one when the alternative interpretation of it referring to a universe doesn’t make sense.
The arguments in favor of High 1-B are getting more and more incoherent and reachy the more the thread goes on.
Agree with Ultima here.
I agreed to it. Though if the statements don't qualify for evidence then it would just be back to my original stance of incalculable not meaning anything tiering wise.unless im missing something
Ultima’s stance of it being techno-babble would make sense… if it were actually techno-babble. Like the thing with techno-babble is that usually everyone agrees that it’s techno-babble since you can’t make anything sensical out of it no matter how you look at it. But I, and other people advocating for this upgrade, never once went “oh this statement makes no sense whatsoever” in the history of being aware of this statement. Which makes it very unlikely that it means nothing. Heck even the opposition usually doesn’t argue that the statement means nothing at all.I agreed to it. Though if the statements don't qualify for evidence then it would just be back to my original stance of incalculable not meaning anything tiering wise.
I think we can just list out all possible outcomes and start rejecting them one by one to reach the most likely interpretation which makes the most sense in context of the series.Ultima’s stance of it being techno-babble would make sense… if it were actually techno-babble. Like the thing with techno-babble is that usually everyone agrees that it’s techno-babble since you can’t make anything sensical out of it no matter how you look at it. But I, and other people advocating for this upgrade, never once went “oh this statement makes no sense whatsoever” in the history of being aware of this statement. Which makes it very unlikely that it means nothing. Heck even the opposition usually doesn’t argue that the statement means nothing at all.
Ultima also doesn’t just say it doesn’t mean anything tiering-wise, he goes once step further and says it means nothing in any conceivable way.
Damn man, bro is demonMost importantly, I disagree .
omg frDamn man, bro is demon
Since Ultima is the one who redid the Tiering system, if they think that it doesn't qualify for a rating then it wouldn't qualify for a rating.Idk abt qawsed atp
That's not how it works, plus “they?”Since Ultima is the one who redid the Tiering system, if they think that it doesn't qualify for a rating then it wouldn't qualify for a rating.
He just meant that he agrees with Ultima’s stance I think. Also I think he said “they” because we don’t know Ultima’s gender? Idk.That's not how it works, plus “they?”
Most importantly, I disagree