• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

BFG 10,000 FTL attack speed

Jason_Courne

He/Him
Messages
1,663
Reaction score
1,749
The BFG 10,000 can shoot down FTL ships, that's it. That's the entire thread, it should get FTL attack speed

Ok but seriously
Originally established as a mining and communication relay, the UAC outpost on Phobos began immediate expansion following the destruction of the Argent facility on Mars. The UAC Board of Directors, intent on retaining their monopoly of the red planet and its surrounding airspace, issued the construction of an expansive defensive platform. Using technology derived from the BFG-9000, the design plan called for a massive particle cannon to be built on the orbiting moon. The BFG-10000, the largest man-made weapon platform ever conceived, wields enough firepower to defend against even the most sophisticated of capital-grade FTL cruisers in existence - or against the eventual potentiality of a space-bound demonic threat.
The Codex/Story of Earth states the BFG-10000 was designed with the goal of shooting down FTL ships in mind, as a result, the BFG should be capable of shooting projectiles at FTL speeds, for a "Possibly FTL" rating to replace the Relativistic+ one
 
Last edited:
Sounds simple on paper, but I hate being one of those "Devil's Advocates." It just says they can destroy "The most sophisticated FTL Cruisers." It's hyping up great fire power that can basically destroy the largest battlecruisers that came from the most far away places that just so happen to have FTL flight speed (For obvious reasons). But based on proposals I have seen before, one could ask if there is proof the projectiles gain on the ships while flying away at FTL velocities? If sentence said, "Not even FTL Cruisers can escape its might," it be a different story and more obvious. But the current sentence is kind of vague in that regard.
 
Yeah I can understand the vagueness, but for it to actually defend against said FTL cruisers, it should be possibly capable of similar speeds

So how about "possibly FTL" instead?
 
Sounds simple on paper, but I hate being one of those "Devil's Advocates." It just says they can destroy "The most sophisticated FTL Cruisers." It's hyping up great fire power that can basically destroy the largest battlecruisers that came from the most far away places that just so happen to have FTL flight speed (For obvious reasons). But based on proposals I have seen before, one could ask if there is proof the projectiles gain on the ships while flying away at FTL velocities? If sentence said, "Not even FTL Cruisers can escape its might," it be a different story and more obvious. But the current sentence is kind of vague in that regard.
Can't we just angsize Mars and use frame by frame to see how long it took to get there?
 
I agree with this, seems prerequisite that it should tag the ships, and it is not far from the current speed stat.
 
Sounds simple on paper, but I hate being one of those "Devil's Advocates." It just says they can destroy "The most sophisticated FTL Cruisers." It's hyping up great fire power that can basically destroy the largest battlecruisers that came from the most far away places that just so happen to have FTL flight speed (For obvious reasons). But based on proposals I have seen before, one could ask if there is proof the projectiles gain on the ships while flying away at FTL velocities? If sentence said, "Not even FTL Cruisers can escape its might," it be a different story and more obvious. But the current sentence is kind of vague in that regard.
I share the same sentiment. Do we have further context on "how" it destroys FTL Cruisers?

The BFG 10000 fires in a straight line and requires a noticeable priming time. For it to aim and fire on a passing ship going FTL in some direction seems questionable to me.
 
I mean, the priming time and firing in a straight line actually leads to more credence it IS a FTL projectile, because otherwise that would mean some FTL battleships literally sit and wait for a projectile they should outspeed to hit them

Making it kind of a useless defense mechanism
 
I mean, the priming time and firing in a straight line actually leads to more credence it IS a FTL projectile, because otherwise that would mean some FTL battleships literally sit and wait for a projectile they should outspeed to hit them

Making it kind of a useless defense mechanism
That's the thing, we don't know the "movement status" of these ships when they are destroyed. The speed of the the gun's rotationary movements imply that they are stationary ships.
 
That's the thing, we don't know the "movement status" of these ships when they are destroyed. The speed of the the gun's rotationary movements imply that they are stationary ships.
Yeah but like I said, the gun being so large and actually needing to charge up it's attack makes it more likely they wouldn't just be stationary.

Personally I think it lines up with the site's definition of a possibly rating, it has some basis (we are outright told it can defend against FTL ships). Although we don't know the exact manner, we have some reason to believe it's doing so through projectile speed (The shear size, predictable trajectory, and charging time would theoretically make it easier to dodge, and render less substantial against FTL attacking ships)
 
I mean, the priming time and firing in a straight line actually leads to more credence it IS a FTL projectile, because otherwise that would mean some FTL battleships literally sit and wait for a projectile they should outspeed to hit them

Making it kind of a useless defense mechanism
The general impression isn't so much that the ship is retreating, it's more so that it's trying to evade Earth. If anything, the ships are more implied to be flying towards it and not away. The defense mechanism has more to do with range and heavy firepower that not even the largest ships can withstand it, rather than proof it fires FTL projectiles that ships try to retreat against.
 
Back
Top