• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

General DC Comics Discussion Thread

Ya'll missed This sucka
Bump

And why is supergirl High 1-C exactly?
 
Bump

And why is supergirl High 1-C exactly?
It's explained on the profile.
 
@Tllmbrg Why is there no speed stat?
 
So, I'm looking at one of the feats people argue as an Anti-feat, and it is HILARIOUSLY out of context.

This one: Superman passes out after stopping a ship that would destroy a continent. Action Comics 902

Well, if you read the storyline you'd see: Superman was already weakened from being tortured and repeatedly blasted by Lex Luthor with the power of the Zone Child before he even got to where Doomslayer was. Action Comics #900. He even passes out before he even fights Doomslayer.

Then he gets into another fight with the Doomsdays and gets beaten up by Doomslayer AGAIN immediately before performing this feat. Action Comics 901-902.

Using that as an anti-feat when he's already clearly incredibly weakened feels....disingenuous to me.
 
So, I'm looking at one of the feats people argue as an Anti-feat, and it is HILARIOUSLY out of context.

This one: Superman passes out after stopping a ship that would destroy a continent. Action Comics 902

Well, if you read the storyline you'd see: Superman was already weakened from being tortured and repeatedly blasted by Lex Luthor with the power of the Zone Child before he even got to where Doomslayer was. Action Comics #900. He even passes out before he even fights Doomslayer.

Then he gets into another fight with the Doomsdays and gets beaten up by Doomslayer AGAIN immediately before performing this feat. Action Comics 901-902.

Using that as an anti-feat when he's already clearly incredibly weakened feels....disingenuous to me.
You may post this in the Tier 2 thread if you’d like.
 
We discussed the Warworld one on here and it was agreed that that one has way too many asterisks. While Superman was sundipped, Warworld was being moved by FTL Thrusters amped by Imperiex.


Also, All Star Superman is super non-canon, so not sure why that one is constantly referenced.

The Superman 187 one in the full scan has Superman disagree with Lois on whether he could or couldn't, and he ends up moving Krypton via both his strength and using his heat vision to power Ion engines to help so that one's not a good example. At best, it's a feat of a weakened Superman having enough strength and power in his heat vision to assist in moving a planet.

The JLA #75 one has them literally having just come back to life and still being weakened.

The Justice League of America (2006) #29 one has them pulling the Earth against Starbreaker trying to pull it into the sun, with Starbreaker explicitly taking energy to do it and them fighting his energy even as he powers up.

Adventures of Superman 618 is actually more of a high showing than a low showing as John and Alan aren't just holding the Earth together, they're holding it together and creating atmosphere and gravity against Fifth dimension magic.

Trinity#49 is just plain unusable as Hal's ring and every hero's power are being drained. It's not just that the planet was busted and torn apart, but its worldspirit was removed, which was connected to all the heroes powers and was draining them all (Trinity vol 1 (2006) #49). That's why his ring was counting down the charge in that scan, and why his powers came back the moment the World-Spirit was restored despite both his main and emergency charge being depleted.

Action comics 901-902, I've discussed, so I'll just quote it again here:
So, I'm looking at one of the feats people argue as an Anti-feat, and it is HILARIOUSLY out of context.

This one: Superman passes out after stopping a ship that would destroy a continent. Action Comics 902

Well, if you read the storyline you'd see: Superman was already weakened from being tortured and repeatedly blasted by Lex Luthor with the power of the Zone Child before he even got to where Doomslayer was. Action Comics #900. He even passes out before he even fights Doomslayer.

Then he gets into another fight with the Doomsdays and gets beaten up by Doomslayer AGAIN immediately before performing this feat. Action Comics 901-902.

Using that as an anti-feat when he's already clearly incredibly weakened feels....disingenuous to me.
Teen Titans/JLA is slightly more complicated than "A team is moving the moon". The team specifically is dismantling the weapons and tactics of the Cyberion station, reclaiming the New Genesis tech and keeping Cyberion station from moving the moon in a way that would disrupt Earth.

Don't get me wrong, you did really amazing work, but a lot of these were discussed and the context is missing for the Anti-feats.
 
Being weakened, even to a significant degree, doesn't actually prevent these from being anti-feats given the relative enormity of the tier being proposed. So those aren't really rebuttals to these feats and shouldn't be taken as such.
 
Being weakened, even to a significant degree, doesn't actually prevent these from being anti-feats given the relative enormity of the tier being proposed. So those aren't really rebuttals to these feats and shouldn't be taken as such.
That's... just wrong, and kinda naive?

A character can be weakened to any level, it just depends on what the author wants.
 
Like I said, the relative enormity of the tier being proposed makes that stance unrealistic. They are still valid anti-feats for the tiers being proposed. Though I'd certainly agree not to using using as anti-feats for star level tiers.
 
It does. It'd be illogical to think differently, given the tier he's being alleged to have.
 
Your logic is, since Superman has some kind of infinite strength/power (according to the proposed Tier), he can't be weakened to a state where this infinity becomes finite, right? Just to make sure we're on the same page.
 
he can't be weakened to a state where this infinity becomes finite, right?
I genuinely have no idea where you got that impression, because none of my comments up to this point ever used the word infinite or finite.
 
Then what you are saying is even more wrong than I initally thought. Hopefully this won't make a difference on the thread.
We have a Tier 2 that can hold back to the point that they don't kill 10-Bs, this is basically the same thing
Doesn't Dragon Ball Super has something like this too?
 
Being weakened matters a lot, literally everyone knows it. You're the only one arguing the opposite. It's common knowledge, if someone is weaker than their base form, then an anti feat doesn't mean much to their regular base form.
 
Sure, like I said, it'd be inappropriate to use it as an anti-feat for star level or something comparable, but being weakened alone doesn't justify it in this circumstance.

I can see you won't be convinced so I won't go around in circles explaining it any more, but that's just the most reasonable approach.
 
What circumstance is even preventing being weaker not mattering?
 
So scrolling through general discussion threads led me here somehow

Characters can be weakened to any degree the author wants so me personally, I don't see any "anti-feats" involving a weakened version of a character to actually be anti-feats. *********** Tier 2 Goku got grazed by a bullet to show he's "getting rusty" (even though he's still easily in the 2-C range) so clearly the writers can just do whatever the hell they want.

That's just my two cents
 
Eh. You can say that of course, but these are the facts. Some vague notion of "weakened" doesn't mean an event is incapable of telling us anything about a characters power. Pretending that just to achieve a higher rating than is justified is simply an inaccurate way to rate a character.
 
Eh. You can say that of course, but these are the facts. Some vague notion of "weakened" doesn't mean an event is incapable of telling us anything about a characters power. Pretending that just to achieve a higher rating than is justified is simply an inaccurate way to rate a character.
Uh, no. It really isn't. The facts are that [insert anti-feat here] is done by a weakened version of a character, and said character can be as weakened as the narrative needs them to be.

Saying we're "pretending" and that our viewpoint is "simply inaccurate" as if yours is objectively correct ain't the best look
 
Eh. You can say that of course, but these are the facts. Some vague notion of "weakened" doesn't mean an event is incapable of telling us anything about a characters power. Pretending that just to achieve a higher rating than is justified is simply an inaccurate way to rate a character.
Dude. In one of those supposed anti-feats, DOOMSDAY kicked his ass. Twice. Not even counting the other events in that comic, but Doomsday going to town on him is more than enough to weaken him to such a degree, given that he, you know, damn near killed him in their first, and pretty much every, encounter.
 
Doomsday going to town on him is more than enough to weaken him to such a degree, given that he, you know, damn near killed him in their first, and pretty much every, encounter.
I absolutely agree with that. Just not for the same reason as you.
 
Eh. You can say that of course, but these are the facts. Some vague notion of "weakened" doesn't mean an event is incapable of telling us anything about a characters power. Pretending that just to achieve a higher rating than is justified is simply an inaccurate way to rate a character.
nope-filthy-frank.gif
 
Back
Top