- 16,286
- 17,801
*end of the arcWe're waiting for the new redraw
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
*end of the arcWe're waiting for the new redraw
i wanna 3-C saitama so i can make kang vs saitamahttps://cdn.**********.com/attachme...2023294809161860/saitamagrowthscalethingy.png
just so you know. taking the graph absolutely seriously would make saitama 64 times more powerful and garou over 20 times more powerful near the end of their fight and galaxy level as a result.
apparently yesIs the current chapter getting redrawn?
Damn. Wonder what the changes might be.apparently yes
saitama loses power mimicry and garou doesn't dieDamn. Wonder what the changes might be.
The graph no longer exist, Saitama was just holding back and continuously using more and more power during his fight.Damn. Wonder what the changes might be.
Is this a bad thing? I hope he remembers that, so that he stops looking for someone to challenge him and focuses more on the relationships he has created.saitama remembers the other timeline
what will happenThe graph no longer exist, Saitama was just holding back and continuously using more and more power during his fight.
Is this a bad thing? I hope he remembers that, so that he stops looking for someone to challenge him and focuses more on the relationships he has created.
What if the redraw put alephs as the unit of measure of Y axis? =)Unironically, I think the graph nerfed Saitama more than it helped him, since we now know that his power is not infinite and that other characters can surpass previous version of him.
I don't think he nerfed him, I think he buffed his previous forms, since the training saitama when he was one-shotted increased in power and one-shotted the one who one-shotted him.Unironically, I think the graph nerfed Saitama more than it helped him, since we now know that his power is not infinite and that other characters can surpass previous version of him.
blast:i care about earth*proceds to literraly see how people die*I like how this sequence implies Blast just stood there watching Garou destroy Genos and allowed Bang to fall.
Bang goes from standing up yelling at Garou with Blast then it cuts to Bang down and Genos dead with half of his head gone. Like what?
unless it is literally a logic as justanormalperson said, that it is literally for alephs, or as I can think of it.In the perception of your average OPM fan who thinks he soloes fiction and that ONE intended him to be an undefeatable gag character then yeah it's a nerf, since it proves his power isn't beyond infinity+++.
But now he actually has a chance to win battles in his tier and not be called an unskilled haxless brick.
4-A is a huge tier, I wonder what matches Saitama can even have without them being a stomp for either side.
Oof.*end of the arc
This was kinda true. ONE had gone on record stating multiple times how he wrote Saitama to be pretty much capped at max level and the strongest in OPM.that ONE intended him to be an undefeatable gag character then yeah it's a nerf
i will say that,the fights will be:maybe one character from Kirby
I'll try to refute this point using mathematical proofs. Let's say Saitama's power is graphed as being 1 unknown unit on the Y axis, and then he's shown on the next plotted point, he's 2 units up the Y axis. That means from point 1 to point 2, he has grown 2 times in power, regardless of the units.There is literally no units on the graph at all. You can’t say it’s in joules because that’s not that the manga says. You can’t say it’s in megatons because that’s not what the manga says. You’re trying to add something that literally isn’t there.
The graph is unquantifiable. The increases are unquantifiable. We aren’t giving Saitama an over 9x increase based on that.
the only think i understand his:I'll try to refute this point using mathematical proofs. Let's say Saitama's power is graphed as being 1 unknown unit on the Y axis, and then he's shown on the next plotted point, he's 2 units up the Y axis. That means from point 1 to point 2, he has grown 2 times in power, regardless of the units.
Let's use a very simple mathematical proof to show this. Say 1 point on the graph is R in value. That means each point is R times how many units up from the origin they are. We'll start small and work our way up to prove this equation is true.
Starting simple, R = 2. No units. Well if we're 1 unit up on the Y axis, the equation is Y1 = R x 1. 2 x 1 = 2, duh, so that means we have a value of 2.
Moving on if R = 2, and we're 2 units up on the Y axis, that would mean our equation is Y1 = 2 x 2 = 4. Seems internally consistent
Now if we want to find the multiplier required to get from our 1st Y value to our 2nd Y value, we just divde the larger number by the smaller one, getting a x2 multiplier.
Now for a larger scale example:
Let's say R = 76954768457654876 we're 2 units up. Well let's just plug it in to our equation, Y1 = R x 2, which equals 1.5390954e+17.
Then, on the next point, we're 4 units up. So Y2 = R x 4, which gets us 3.0781907e+17.
Now how many times more powerful did the person get between Y1 and Y2? They grew twice as powerful. Why does this matter? In the OPM graph we never get how much 1 equals, so why does this long response even exist?
Because mathematical reasoning exists. Let me phrase this like a math question. Person X one starts 5 units up on the Y axis. He then climbs another five units. Without knowing R, how many times more powerful is Person X at Y2 when compared to Y1?
Well even without knowing R, making our equation Y1 = R x 5 and Y2 = R x 10, we still know that the value of R is a constant on a graph. So we just divide the two numbers we have by each other to learn that they grew twice as powerful. The units are abritrary, it doesn't even matter if they use their own made up system called Terragiggachadchucknorris Scooby Doos, it is still showing his power doubled.
Aren't there also graphs that make use of logarithmic scales?I'll try to refute this point using mathematical proofs. Let's say Saitama's power is graphed as being 1 unknown unit on the Y axis, and then he's shown on the next plotted point, he's 2 units up the Y axis. That means from point 1 to point 2, he has grown 2 times in power, regardless of the units.
Let's use a very simple mathematical proof to show this. Say 1 point on the graph is R in value. That means each point is R times how many units up from the origin they are. We'll start small and work our way up to prove this equation is true.
Starting simple, R = 2. No units. Well if we're 1 unit up on the Y axis, the equation is Y1 = R x 1. 2 x 1 = 2, duh, so that means we have a value of 2.
Moving on if R = 2, and we're 2 units up on the Y axis, that would mean our equation is Y1 = 2 x 2 = 4. Seems internally consistent
Now if we want to find the multiplier required to get from our 1st Y value to our 2nd Y value, we just divde the larger number by the smaller one, getting a x2 multiplier.
Now for a larger scale example:
Let's say R = 76954768457654876 we're 2 units up. Well let's just plug it in to our equation, Y1 = R x 2, which equals 1.5390954e+17.
Then, on the next point, we're 4 units up. So Y2 = R x 4, which gets us 3.0781907e+17.
Now how many times more powerful did the person get between Y1 and Y2? They grew twice as powerful. Why does this matter? In the OPM graph we never get how much 1 equals, so why does this long response even exist?
Because mathematical reasoning exists. Let me phrase this like a math question. Person X one starts 5 units up on the Y axis. He then climbs another five units. Without knowing R, how many times more powerful is Person X at Y2 when compared to Y1?
Well even without knowing R, making our equation Y1 = R x 5 and Y2 = R x 10, we still know that the value of R is a constant on a graph. So we just divide the two numbers we have by each other to learn that they grew twice as powerful. The units are abritrary, it doesn't even matter if they use their own made up system called Terragiggachadchucknorris Scooby Doos, it is still showing his power doubled.
This. I didn't want to say it, but this is what I want. For the graph to be removed. It would change pretty much everything.The graph no longer exist, Saitama was just holding back and continuously using more and more power during his fight.
the reason why the graph is bad,is because,don't say anything about saitama power growing(we see,but not multiply or something)This. I didn't want to say it, but this is what I want. For the graph to be removed. It would change pretty much everything.
adding onto what's already been saidThere is literally no units on the graph at all. You can’t say it’s in joules because that’s not that the manga says. You can’t say it’s in megatons because that’s not what the manga says. You’re trying to add something that literally isn’t there.
The graph is unquantifiable. The increases are unquantifiable. We aren’t giving Saitama an over 9x increase based on that.
Full stop, right here. This is why Saitama’s not getting the multiplier, because nothing on the graph indicates what each point equals. And your logic of “oh he moved two points up so he’s two times stronger” doesn’t work when there’s graphs that count up each decimal point.In the OPM graph we never get how much 1 equals, so why does this long response even exist?
It’s not a far reach at all, but without an explicit multiplier, we cannot say Saitama made the over 9x gap to 3-C just because he became far stronger than Garou.Too much importance is being given to the graph. What I, and a few others, are saying is that it's not that far of a reach for at least Saitama to possibly have reached the realm of 3-C, given how he had completely and utterly exceeded Garou's level by the end of the fight and had potentially reached the same power gap as it was between him and normal Garou in the past, if not higher.
where I'm from we would call that a bad argumentFull stop, right here. This is why Saitama’s not getting the multiplier, because nothing on the graph indicates what each point equals. And your logic of “oh he moved two points up so he’s two times stronger” doesn’t work when there’s graphs that count up each decimal point.
Let’s take your example but say the graph counts decimals. If Saitama starts at 1.1 and moves up two points, he’s only at 1.3 now. It’s not a 2x difference anymore, is it?
Also you seem to confuse me saying units with me wanting it to say joules or something. That’s not the point I was making. The point is that there is not a single number given on the graph, any multiplier you come up with will be headcanon, whether that’s 2x, 9x or 80x like that other guy suggested.
Also, logical deduction would disprove it being in decimal scaling since there would practically be no difference in power, unless those decimals represented something else, in which case we are back to square one with regards to that whole argument. But, tbh, this whole graph thing is just a headache.Full stop, right here. This is why Saitama’s not getting the multiplier, because nothing on the graph indicates what each point equals. And your logic of “oh he moved two points up so he’s two times stronger” doesn’t work when there’s graphs that count up each decimal point.
Let’s take your example but say the graph counts decimals. If Saitama starts at 1.1 and moves up two points, he’s only at 1.3 now. It’s not a 2x difference anymore, is it?
Also you seem to confuse me saying units with me wanting it to say joules or something. That’s not the point I was making. The point is that there is not a single number given on the graph, any multiplier you come up with will be headcanon, whether that’s 2x, 9x or 80x like that other guy suggested.
I hate to break it to you, but that’s how the site works. If you don’t have a statement of a multiplier, you’re not getting a multiplier.saitama>>>>Garou>>>Garou>>Garou>Garou>Garou scaling chain of one shots isn't even him getting three times stronger, because clearly that is the more reasonable assumption to make.
I dunno about the graph or whatever but I just wanna explain why this scaling chain won't be accepted.but yes, for the sake of accuracy and being an absolutely reasonable and making profiles that have absolutely the best facts, let's say that saitama>>>>Garou>>>Garou>>Garou>Garou>Garou scaling chain of one shots isn't even him getting three times stronger, because clearly that is the more reasonable assumption to make.
I would advise that you have a response to literally anything else I saidI hate to break it to you, but that’s how the site works. If you don’t have a statement of a multiplier, you’re not getting a multiplier.
ok actually, both of you are ignoring that the scaling chain was never my main argument, I only brought it up because it would be much more compelling to disagree with something like a 2.6 times multiplierI dunno about the graph or whatever but I just wanna explain why this scaling chain won't be accepted.
This guy has a scaling chain that looks like this, Hades (Amped Up) >> Hades (Base) >>>>>> 3 Sacred Treasures >>> Pit (Base) = 317.9 Teratons. To put into perspective how big the gaps here are, base form Hades can casually one shot the 3 sacred treasures just by burping. Yet we only put his amped form a "likely Large Country level+" despite the 317.9 teratons feat he scales massively above is only 35% below the baseline for a + rating.
Funny how you're saying they're ignoring you when you're ignoring them, while you're trying to place headcanon on a graph.ok actually, both of you are ignoring that the scaling chain was never my main argument, I only brought it up because it would be much more compelling to disagree with something like a 2.6 times multiplier
I'm very aware of how messed up scaling chains are here already, I mean I've seen what they did to Jotaro being like a few decimals below the upscale value to 8-B