• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

Hello, if you don't mind, I updated this minor calc that you accepted a while ago, so I would appreciate if you could reevaluate it when you have time. Thanks in advance

Pico matchup
Artorimachi_Meteoraft
Artorimachi_Meteoraft
Could you give your input since you made the character I know the hunter since I’m one of the supporters for the verse thank tou
ShockingPsychic
ShockingPsychic
Gimme a lil bit, but yeah def
Hello Armor can you please state if you currently still hold your same stance on this CRT, we'd like it if it can finally be finished. (Also can you please tag any other staff too)


Eminence in the shadow matchup
Hi, I saw you being a GF supporter, so...

If a cosmology is accepted to be tier 1 by three staff, but a character scaling to the cosmology is accepted by two people. Is that fine?
LephyrTheRevanchist
LephyrTheRevanchist
No imo

But you should ask the staff participating in the thread (specially if an admin is there, as their decision in regards to the threads conclusion goes above a thread mod)
May I have a vote here? Just a few votes to wrap this match up thabks

Hi, could you please invite the moderators to this thread?
Can you give these relatively straightforward Sonic revisions a look?
Basically, this is just about adding Supernatural willpower to some characters. A couple of basic hax resistances, removing Sonic and Tails' resistance to absolute zero temperatures, and giving the verse (mostly Eggman) the hax that's missing from Sonic Shuffle and Sonic Superstars.
could you check this out? already got DDM to say he’ll check back on it once more staff give their evaluation.

Hello there Elizhaa. You seem to be an expert in Tier 1 revisions. A while ago, I made this God of War downgrade thread, but it's closed now. Now, I do want to reopen it, but it would be helpful to get staff support so that my thread doesn't get immediately get shut down again, so I'm looking for your personal input. If you look into it, the main problem with the Low 1-C ratings for God of War is that they're based off of completely unnecessary headcanon about the Nine Realms being parallel even though this is completely unnecessary.

The situation is that God of War's cosmology has multiple realms that exist separate from each other that are unable to be traveled between save for special methods such as portals . The linked post is basically the only one that all the rejections are based off of. There's also this but the argument isn't coherent at all and it's just a bunch of non-sequiturs that don't prove anything substantial. Anyways, these facts of the cosmology are taken as meaning that these realms are parallel and thus embedded in higher dimensional space.

But the issue is that even if we assume it is 5D, there is no proof that it is fully-sized. Thus, the proof for Low 1-C is insufficient, since there is no proof that its 5D volume is any more than just 0. Even if we assume they're parallel and embedded in 5D space, that's not enough for 5D. You can look through the entire thread and even the previous ones or the cosmology page and there's no proof of sufficient extension in the 5th dimensional axis to justify Low 1-C. The closest they get to this is Planck claiming that the branches of the Yggdrasil extend infinitely in 5D space, therefore they must extend substantially along the 5th axis which is obviously a non-sequitur. It has already been pointed out that this is flawed logic as even a 4D object can extend infinitely in 5D space, that does not make it Low 1-C.

Another problem is that there is no proof of these realms being finite, and they are never even said to be universes. The most we know of their size is that they contain galaxies and a cosmos of some sort, but that's obviously not enough to warrant infinite size. Note how even in the cosmology page, there is no evidence of the Nine Realms being universal (which is infinite by our standards unless space is curved or cut off) in size. Only ungrounded statements and extrapolations. Thus, they do not need to be parallel or embedded in a higher dimensional space, as finite dimensions can exist within a larger space of the same dimensionality while neither intersecting nor having to be parallel, so they don't have to be embedded in higher-dimensional space. And the reason why realm travel is generally limited to special methods is not because of some sort of parallelism, but because Odin sealed off travel between realms. That's it.

Would you be willing to open the thread? Maybe support my side if you're convinced?
Hello there Agnaa. You seem to be an expert in Tier 1 revisions. A while ago, I made this God of War downgrade thread, but it's closed now. Now, I do want to reopen it, but it would be helpful to get staff support so that my thread doesn't get immediately get shut down again, so I'm looking for your personal input. If you look into it, the main problem with the Low 1-C ratings for God of War is that they're based off of completely unnecessary headcanon about the Nine Realms being parallel even though this is completely unnecessary.

The situation is that God of War's cosmology has multiple realms that exist separate from each other that are unable to be traveled between save for special methods such as portals . The linked post is basically the only one that all the rejections are based off of. There's also this but the argument isn't coherent at all and it's just a bunch of non-sequiturs that don't prove anything substantial. Anyways, these facts of the cosmology are taken as meaning that these realms are parallel and thus embedded in higher dimensional space.

But the issue is that even if we assume it is 5D, there is no proof that it is fully-sized. Thus, the proof for Low 1-C is insufficient, since there is no proof that its 5D volume is any more than just 0. Even if we assume they're parallel and embedded in 5D space, that's not enough for 5D. You can look through the entire thread and even the previous ones or the cosmology page and there's no proof of sufficient extension in the 5th dimensional axis to justify Low 1-C. The closest they get to this is Planck claiming that the branches of the Yggdrasil extend infinitely in 5D space, therefore they must extend substantially along the 5th axis which is obviously a non-sequitur. It has already been pointed out that this is flawed logic as even a 4D object can extend infinitely in 5D space, that does not make it Low 1-C.

Another problem is that there is no proof of these realms being finite, and they are never even said to be universes. The most we know of their size is that they contain galaxies and a cosmos of some sort, but that's obviously not enough to warrant infinite size. Note how even in the cosmology page, there is no evidence of the Nine Realms being universal (which is infinite by our standards unless space is curved or cut off) in size. Only ungrounded statements and extrapolations. Thus, they do not need to be parallel or embedded in a higher dimensional space, as finite dimensions can exist within a larger space of the same dimensionality while neither intersecting nor having to be parallel, so they don't have to be embedded in higher-dimensional space. And the reason why realm travel is generally limited to special methods is not because of some sort of parallelism, but because Odin sealed off travel between realms. That's it.

Would you be willing to open the thread? Maybe support my side if you're convinced?
Hello there Executor_N0. A while ago, you said you were reading this God of War downgrade thread that I made, but you never really responded. It's closed now. Now, I do want to reopen it, but it would be helpful to get staff support so that my thread doesn't get immediately get shut down again. If you look into it, the main problem with the Low 1-C ratings for God of War is that they're based off of completely unnecessary headcanon about the Nine Realms being parallel even though this is completely unnecessary.

The situation is that God of War's cosmology has multiple realms that exist separate from each other that are unable to be traveled between save for special methods such as portals . The linked post is basically the only one that all the rejections are based off of. You can look at the thread and the arguments pretty much all derive from that. There's also this but the argument isn't coherent at all and it's just a bunch of non-sequiturs that don't prove anything substantial. Anyways, these facts of the cosmology are taken as meaning that these realms are parallel and thus embedded in higher dimensional space.

But the issue is that even if we assume it is 5D, there is no proof that it is fully-sized. Thus, the proof for Low 1-C is insufficient, since there is no proof that its 5D volume is any more than just 0. Even if we assume they're parallel and embedded in 5D space, that's not enough for 5D. You can look through the entire thread and even the previous ones or the cosmology page and there's no proof of sufficient extension in the 5th dimensional axis to justify Low 1-C. The closest they get to this is Planck claiming that the branches of the Yggdrasil extend infinitely in 5D space, therefore they must extend substantially along the 5th axis which is obviously a non-sequitur. It has already been pointed out that this is flawed logic as even a 4D object can extend infinitely in 5D space, that does not make it Low 1-C.

Another problem is that there is no proof of these realms being finite, and they are never even said to be universes. The most we know of their size is that they contain galaxies and a cosmos of some sort, but that's obviously not enough to warrant infinite size. Note how even in the cosmology page, there is no evidence of the Nine Realms being universal (which is infinite by our standards unless space is curved or cut off) in size. Only ungrounded statements and extrapolations. Thus, they do not need to be parallel or embedded in a higher dimensional space, as finite dimensions can exist within a larger space of the same dimensionality while neither intersecting nor having to be parallel, so they don't have to be embedded in higher-dimensional space. And the reason why realm travel is generally limited to special methods is not because of some sort of parallelism, but because Odin sealed off travel between realms. That's it.

Would you be willing to open the thread? Maybe support my side if you're convinced?
Hello there Ultima. You seem to be an expert in Tier 1 revisions. A while ago, I think you said you'd look over this God of War downgrade thread that I made, but it was closed before that could happen. Now, I do want to reopen it, but it would be helpful to get staff support so that my thread doesn't get immediately get shut down again.

Anyways, the arguments here essentially boil down to me saying that none of the "evidence" brought up is sufficient to demonstrate that God of War has 5D cosmology let alone 5D in a substantial enough manner to warrant Low 1-C. Basically, the situation is that God of War's cosmology has multiple realms that exist separate from each other that are unable to be traveled between save for special methods such as portals. The linked post is basically the only one that all the rejections are based off of. There's also this but the argument isn't coherent at all and it's just a bunch of non-sequiturs. Anyways, these facts of the cosmology are taken as meaning that these realms are parallel and thus embedded in higher dimensional space. The issue is that these realms are finite and are never even said to be universes. The most we know of their size is that they contain galaxies, but that's obviously not enough to warrant infinite size. Note how even in the cosmology page, there is no evidence of the Nine Realms being universal (which is infinite by our standards unless space is curved or cut off) in size. Only ungrounded statements and extrapolations. And of course, finite dimensions can exist within a larger space of the same dimensionality while neither intersecting nor having to be parallel, so they don't have to be embedded in higher-dimensional space. And the reason why realm travel is generally limited to special methods is not because of some sort of parallelism, but because Odin sealed off travel between realms. That's it.

Another problem is that even if we assume it is 5D, there is no proof that it is fully-sized. Thus, the proof for Low 1-C is insufficient, since there is no proof that its 5D volume is any more than just 0. Even if we assume they're parallel and embedded in 5D space, that's not enough for 5D. You can look through the entire thread and even the previous ones or the cosmology page and there's no proof of sufficient extension in the 5th dimensional axis to justify Low 1-C. The closest they get to this is Planck claiming that the branches of the Yggdrasil extend infinitely in 5D space, therefore they must extend substantially along the 5th axis which is obviously a non-sequitur. It has already been pointed out that this is flawed logic as even a 4D object can extend infinitely in 5D space, that does not make it Low 1-C.

Would you be willing to open the thread? Maybe support my side if you're convinced?
Want to help us finish this match? Only two more votes needed.

JnSteHar002
JnSteHar002
Just did; any chance you can look at this thread?

Could you check this out?

Could you take a look?

I need some votes votes for these matches and was wondering if you could give them thanks




Back
Top