• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

Hello, I noticed the SCP 001 Andrew Swans Proposal profile has a very, very, minor typo in it. Within the Transduality justification, fictional is spelled “fictiona.”
Hello, I was wondering if you could take a look at this thread discussing the scaling of specific human characters in Danny Phantom to ghosts in terms of statistics. Currently we do, but recently the ghosts have been buffed to tier 2 and thus has caused issue with how we treat the specific humans characters. I have provided two options and a blog in the OP that showcases the feats/scaling/statements of certain human against ghosts and how they compare to other humans. It would be helpful if you could give your honest thoughts on how should we scale them.

https://vsbattles.com/threads/danny...g-discussion-i-ant-afraid-of-no-ghost.158477/
  • Like
Reactions: Deagonx
Deagonx
Deagonx
I'll try to take a look when I can. I've been a bit busy lately and also recovering from an illness.
LordGriffin1000
LordGriffin1000
No problem.
Elizhaa Sama this crt needs your input i promise this is the last time 🤗
Hey. I saw you evaluating a COTE thread before. Mind evaling this one too? It's not really controversial (we argued for a while but It wasn't about the debunk). I already have 9 agreements but still need staff agreement.
Dinozxd
Dinozxd
Thanks for the evaluation. I've been waiting for this to get evaled for so long lol.

I was gonna ask if it's ok to apply the changes or not?
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
Unfortunately most verses would require at least two evaluations from relevant staff.

The upside is that normally once one of us has pulled the trigger, others are more willing to lean in and say "I agree with what the other guy said". They still need to read it but I've noticed a greater willingness at least.
Dinozxd
Dinozxd
Alright, got it. Thank you for informing me.
Do you mind evaling this thread when you have time? 8 people agreed to the changes. We just need staff agreement here. The thread's kinda clogged up with unnecesary debate so It would probably be easier for you to just check out the problems I pointed out in the OP. Thank you.
Back
Top