• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

Hello! if you have time, can you please check these out?

Pls opinion here.
You have to take that cube like a sentient thing there Is even informations manipulation type 1 and maybe biological manipulation
Could you take a look?
Sorry for the bother, dude. If you have a minute, can you give your input in this CRT? Thanks in advance.

I was told to ask you if we can calc gravitational forces (attraction and repulsion as AP feat)
This is the feat
can i ask for you calc knowledge on a topic good sir
Mizuki67
thank you so much
I wanted to know about crushing force of massive stars if its calculatable
This feat include releasing gravitational waves which is Sol (speed of light or so i hear)
Here is the feat

This feat was a character dodging the gravitational waves

Idk if you can help me figure all this out (also lifting strength)
Chariot190
Chariot190
Without exponentially more information like, mass, density, size, and so on of said stars and what exactly blud is doing (idk what novel this even is), it'd be nigh impossible to calc without just making stuff up.

Ya could skip the middle man though, an easy way to do it would it be to just disregard the scifi star stuff, and skip straight to calcing what he's crushed. Which is kinda easy, mostly just need the surface area of the object and the relevant Mpa or structural integrity. Even just crushing a fist sized rock is Class K, depending on what he's done, it could be wild.

If, quite literally, it's a gravitational wave; zero rest mass rad type shit. Literally. Then yes, it'd be SoL. That's an if though, ya def gotta prove it's an actual 100% gravitational wave adheres to the actual stuff, much like one would need to prove a funny pewpew beam gun is lightspeed.
Mizuki67
okay, lets just say things like mass is the Same as our star, but the gravitational influence is something bigger like sirius or alpha centauri, what would that entail?
If you use the mass, density and whatever calc info of this
Hello, could you please evaluate our calc on namek's size?
Chariot190
Chariot190
I've seen it, it's inflated and wrong, put simply, I've just refrained because I didn't wanna come off as mean.
Literally just do what I said in the thread when I originally brought it up, it's the safest way. But.

Using multiple shots to calc it is kinda bad because we have no idea when and where each individual sun is in, in relation to each other, between said scenes.

The shot used to angsize on landing isn't usable, as we do not know which sun that is, that could be the sun furthest away, which in turn wanks the next panel because you could be taking the distance from the furthest sun, applying it to the closest sun, and then getting hyperinflated results, which is why I said how to do it. unless multiple suns in shot, you simply can't do it that way.

Additionally, the angsize distance to PoV in the next shot, doesn't work.
That very panel shows how wrong it is, we know, for a fact, that one such sun must be parallel with Namek, ie, directly next to or in front of it, for the day/night cycles to work. Yet, by taking the 19m km distance, well put simply the gap between Namek and said sun, or ****, any sun, should be 20 suns long visually, that, is evidently not how it's drawn, and most definitely not with the sun that's used for scaling, at best it'd a few sun gap.
But then you could say "well maybe the sun is smaller/bigger", yeah, sure, but then that'd also affect the angsize distance in turn, ultimately, no matter the case, the gap should be 20 of however big that sun is in length, it isn't, in any shot we have.

Then there's just art accuracy, assuming Akira drew the sun in the sky perfectly as per distance, when we know he's kinda bad with stuff like that (just look at moon shots from earth, they never align with the actual stated moon distance and sizes) not exactly reliable, doubly when you're taking it onto a panel drawn months later irl that physically can not corroborate the angsized distance based on how it's drawn.

I could go on, there's a lot of stuff here that nuh uh.

Literally just pick a panel, draw two lines and be done with it, it's the safest, and put simply, only way, to calc it without having like a 3D dioramic shot of the thing or jst guessing. And unless some game has that, it be what it be.
Chariot190
Chariot190
which btw, gets namek to be like, 5-7m km in diameter, **** do a high end with the spirit bomb shot if ya want, probably get like 25m km, as long as ya have the low ends too, but this way ain't it chief
can you give some input here? only needs 1 more approval to be accepted
Excuse Me

Can you evaluate this CRT?
Thanks
Been thinking about the Gandalf > Andúril > Sauron > Gandalf issue and got a few ideas.


One thing is that it's mentioned that Gandalf the White can briefly manifest as a "guardian angel" in power at dire moments in reference to his power as a Maia. This could have him briefly be stronger than LA Sauron for short bursts but isn't 100% compatible with Gandalf's statement that Third Age Sauron is above him (not outright incompatible since this would be a brief thing).


Another is turning Gandalf into a stonewall with possibly High 3-A durability or with a form of Invincibility up to that level (he was brought back by Eru with increased power and sanctity).


Andúril is outright said to he as deadly as Narsil, is still feared by Sauron, and is said to have had its light restored so a downgrade for the blade isn't something I would argue for.
Armorchompy
Armorchompy
I can't say I would know about that, sorry.
Tyranno223
Tyranno223
Ah no worries, I was just commenting since I enjoyed brain storming with you previously.
excuse me, can you evaluate this crt?
excuse me, can you evaluate this crt?
excuse me, can you evaluate this crt?
Hi, sorry to bother you again but this topic is something I need to wrap my head around for LotR.

"Are there any 'bounds to a writer's job' except those imposed by his own finiteness? No bounds, but the laws of contradiction, I should think."

This quote was used to describe the role of the Sub-Creator rather than the Creator I believe, as in Tolkien himself and other authors in the "Real World", this cosmologically puts the "Real World" as High 1-A+

The "Real World" is viewed by Eru as fiction again, being that Eru is author of even "us" and that's wonderful support for Tier 0.

However, the "Primary Reality" that the Ainur reside in is described as, at the very least, on par with the "Real World" in existence if not above it (depending on how literally the Timeless Halls are Eru's abode. It's the awkward situation of Seraphim around God's Throne sort of thing).

The Ainur in their origin at the very least rival "authors" in terms of existence (with the Valar being granted titles as Sub-Creators in their own right, albeit in reference to their work in making the material world).

So going back to my earlier rushed reactionary comment, would this result in the entire race (and the many existing sub-creators) being High 1-A+ in origin? Was it not only possible for only 1 character to be High 1-A+ per verse?

Of course this is assuming that the transferring of the quote to Sub-Creators doesn't shake the quote's usability too much.

can you give your opinion about this thread please? i'd like to hear them.
can you give your opinion about this thread? i'd like to hear your opinions about it.

Can you evaluate this thread please? i'd be happy to hear your thoughts.

Could you help me with this?
Could you help with this?
excuse me, can you evaluate this crt?
excuse me, can you evaluate this crt?
excuse me, can you evaluate this crt?
I forgot to check for this, but who gave you permission to make 9 posts in this thread?
Agnaa
Agnaa
ig you're implying some form of bias? But....
  1. I pursue permission for non-staff posts in staff-only threads a lot. You're not the only person whose posts I've deleted for that reason this week. In fact, in that very thread I've deleted other non-staff user's posts long before I deleted yours.
  2. If I was tryna shut you down, doing it after letting your posts sit for hours seems like a bad way to do it. I think the coherent explanation given the evidence is that I forgot.
  3. Similarly, I could've been more harsh and deleted your first 3 posts, since you do typically need explicit permission.
  4. Similarly, I could've not been even-handed with that, and kept posts responding to yours up, instead of deleting them as I did.
  5. I only realised the issue because Phoenks mentioned it to me while we were talking about the thread, and he agrees with your PoV.
If you'd like to recover some of those deleted posts for once you get permission, let me know, and I can copy/paste all of them in the replies here.
The_Smashor
The_Smashor
If you want my honest opinion, the overemphasis of the power of staff members is one of the worst parts of this wiki. The idea that even someone who was adding to the conversation's comments needed to have their comments be deleted just because they're not a staff member is horrid.

I still stand by what I said during the Mario nerfs. This wiki has devolved into politics. And if you're not a politician, your voice inherently matters less, no matter how knowledgeable you are or how long you've been in the hobby. Even if you have important things to say or good ideas that add to the conversation, just because you don't have a little green bar under your name you barely matter.

I can't bring myself to care about this anymore. I'm going back to the Puyo Puyo revisions. Have a pleasant day.
Agnaa
Agnaa
Yeah, I think it'd be better if we just left up posts which said important things, and enforced that against staff and non-staff alike, but we've ended up with this biased half-measure to save on effort. But I think I should enforce the rules as they are, rather than the rules as I want them.

Sorry about that leaving a bad taste in your mouth. I wish you luck in those Puyo revisions, and hope you have a good week!
I'd like to get your opinion here (probably only a 2 minute job)
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
You've got 90 seconds

(I'm at work, may respond later)
Quintessence_PE
Quintessence_PE
1714853311530.png
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
💀

I see your sins
excuse me, can you evaluate this crt?
Can you give input to this thread
Hello Firestorm if you aren't busy your opinion is needed here, thank you


(This is more on the matter of the standards of Big Bangs that create timelines/space-times)
Hi Damage, we need staff input for this thread, can you take a look when you have time?

Back
Top