Antvasima said:
The First Firmament is apparently just the first Marvel universe, before it was split into a multiverse. Our High 1-B (rather than 2-A) rating is likely technically inaccurate for this particular story, but must be placed there anyway for the sake of consistency.
This is just arguing about semantics.
This is no difference than the incredibly flawed argument to say that Tenchi Muyo or Demonbane are only 2-A, as their cosmology only includes a "Multiverse". this is completely ignoring that said multiverses have numerous higher dimensions.
Or to say that Cthulhu Mythos is unimpressive simply because Yog-Sothoth is the embodiment of a multiverse.
DC Vertigo's Lucifer explictly never uses the term "Multiverse" throughout the entirety of the comic's main 75 issue run, it instead refers to reality as "Universe", "Creation", "Cosmos", "Totality", etc. Some try to use this to claim that Lucifer Morningstar is only Universal+. Obviously that is not correct.
Yes, the First Firmament was the first Marvel Universe, but the term Universe is here used not because it is simply a singular space-time continuum like ours, but instead because the First Firmament was singular in its own existence. He was all that existed and he was one, thus he was a universe.
Universe comes from the Latin word "Universus". Universus = Unus + Versus. Unus = One, Versus = Past Participle of "To Turn". So, Universus means "All turned in one", "All things as a whole".
Using the term "Universe" to refer to a singular totality is perfectly acceptable, and much more elegant than to clutter the storyline with meaningless made up terms like Megaverse, Omniverse, Zettaverse, Hyperverse, Ultraverse, Xenoverse, etc.
I would appreciate if the debate could be centered around feats (I.e, the First Firmament being once absolutely all that existed, meaning that even the likes of the Living Tribunal and the Beyonders are extensions of his self) rather than to focus on words.