• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

PMMM AP Changes

Status
Not open for further replies.
Overlord775

Overlord775

26,331
3,127
Currenly PMM's 5-B are rated as such via scaling to fourth timeline Kriemhild being able to destroy the planet, but i think these rating aren't adaquate.

You see, for each time the timeline is reset it gives Madoka an immense power boost, which made her go from 6-C to being comparable to fourth timeline Kriemhild Gretche in only 5 resets

and every PMM 5-B profile scales to Madoka after 100 RESETS

so i think it would be better to rate them Unknow, as rating them at only Planet Level is a serius downplay of the sheer difference between them and the feat (They difference was calced to be above decillion of times).
 
That's why they have the "far higher". I get your point, but at the end of the day it would change virtually nothing.

And at the very least we avoid a bunch of unknowns this way
 
And we don't do that for Ultron (Marvel Comics) so the point is moot.

And being listed as "Unknown" doesn't either, especially when it still means "ridiculously higher than baseline 5-B".
 
Ultron is not even close to the upscale levels of Dark Samus and PMMM

Aand no, arguably they should be more like 3-A
 
I mean, yeah, but they don't have feats on that level and there is really no way at all to pinpoint how strong you get after ~100 "exponentially stronger", so there is no real way to determine their AP excluding "a lot higher than baseline 5-B".
 
If we cannot determine their AP propelly, then we should put them at Uknow, it's the whole point of that rating
 
Kaltias said:
excluding "a lot higher than baseline 5-B".
Click to expand...
^ We do have a baseline to refer to.

At the end of the day I don't care much, it's simply that an actual tier looks better and it basically says the same, and doesn't lead to stuff like people saying that Madoka is 5-B in a thread and 3-C in another one
 
"a lot higher than baseline 5-B" means decillion of times above baseline, when the gap between bottom and top of 5-B is only 45.5, and almost everybody threats it like that
 
Older profiles seem to do the "Unknown" thing, newer profiles seem to do "At least (tier), likely far higher".

I think the 'at least' and 'far higher' accurately represent that they should be obscenely far above.
 
I think " likely far higher" should be used when theres things suggesting you are a higher tier but there's still reason to believe that maybe you aren't actually too far off from the current rating.

In cases where it's extremely unlikely for you to actually be in the listed tier, I think Unknown should be used instead.
 
@Agnaa No other verse as a upscaling as massive as PMMM's (Masadas are getting upgraded to 3-A i think)

I don't think "At least" or "Far Higher" are enought to compensate for the cosmic level they are above that 5-B feat

it's like saying that if the power in a single electron of character is enought to destroy a planet, we should rate that character 5-B instead of Uknown
 
Overlord775 said:
No other verse as a upscaling as massive as PMMM's (Masadas are getting upgraded to 3-A i think)
Click to expand...
Probably not, but Shinobu Oshino used to have it for casually almost destroying Antarctica when simply jumping to travel, and has statements of being able to destroy the planet.
 
Agnaa said:
Probably not, but Shinobu Oshino used to have it for casually almost destroying Antarctica when simply jumping to travel, and has statements of being able to destroy the planet.
Click to expand...
That's not upscaling, that just a Saitama situation, where the character is always casual and we don't know the actual limits of their power

and planet destroying statement don't mean much without context
 
You're right. Considering the situation, Unknown should probably be used.
 
Kaltias said:
^ We do have a baseline to refer to.

At the end of the day I don't care much, it's simply that an actual tier looks better and it basically says the same, and doesn't lead to stuff like people saying that Madoka is 5-B in a thread and 3-C in another one
Click to expand...
If it leads to that, you could just point out the flaw in trying to use the AP of an unknown character as an argument.
 
I can't be in every thread where it could possibly come up to point that out though. If the page doesn't cause the issue to begin with it's better.

Regardless, i'm mostly neutral, I just really don't like the idea of having five characters (including the two most iconic ones) with unknown stats when it's avoidable. I get that "it looks bad" isn't really a strong argument but as I explained both unknown and at least 5-B say basically the same anyway.
 
Just to clarify, I don't think they should just be rated Unknown. They should be "Unknow, at least 5-B, likely far higher"
 
On topic.

I think Unknown at least 5B also makes sense, even if I don't think 5A is really that far off.
 
@Kaltias

You could just put the Upscaling Explanation in the profiles

@Schnee

Ultron only upscales to not being damaged by a bunch of 4-B blasts, meanwhile Dark Samus upscales to going from 6-C to low 4-C with near to none Phazon to absorbing a planet worth of Phazon
 
Notice the Unknow part of his profile.

Superior Ultron, has 17,000 bodies created in one month, each one vastly superior to the last.

One body made him jump from 1 Megafoe to stomping a 3B+ character.
 
Anyway, back on topic, this kinda makes me realize there's a bit of an inconsistency between the 3 profiles that have massive upscaling

I can agree that "at least 5B" or "unknown at least 5B" is probably best to not start a riot on upscalibg, (personally prefer the latter) but Dark Samus is left at a straight "unknown" which, honestly I think "Unknown at least X" would be best for all of the profiles to maintain some consistency.
 
@Kal My point is that if the character is unknown, their AP shouldn't be a point of discussion to begin with, so an argument in the format of "this unknown character wins/loses via having this much AP" should not be something that has an actual reasonable chance of occurring for it to be a concern.

I don't think they do. "At least" means you are above the feat putting you in the tier and "Unknown" means well...that you don't what tier the character is. If the multipliers are so high that they should logically exceed 5-B but that alone isn't enough grounds for a definitive rating, then I definitely think that's more of an unknown case than an at least case.
 
I'm against this. We don't give Composite Link something above 4-B even though the FD Mask buffed him from High 6-C to High 4-C. Even the worst DB wanker won't say that SSJG isn't a boost between where Goku was in 4-B to where he was in 3-A. Frankly, I've been having problems with how PMMM's 5-Bs are ranked regardless due to other reasons. Their current tier is more than fine.
 
That would greatly confuse me because it's the same as, say, Ganondorf's feat except on a smaller scale
 
That's not it. It's that given the intense gap and the exponential jumps, there has to be some sort of an outlier there. Either one, Madoka being 6-C shouldn't be the case and she should straight up be 5-B from first to final timelines, two, the 5-B feat is an outlier, or three, that random jump to 5-B was an anomaly that likely wasn't repeated until the final timeline jump to 2-A (which even then was a result of a wish).
 
That's like saying that Goku had to be 3-A pre-DBS because the jump from 4-B is too big.

Like, Madoka goes from 7-C, to 7-B, to 6-C, to 5-C, then 5-B in four powerups.

Then we simply don't see any version of Madoka till the timeline seen in the anime, we simply know that the loops existed and that each one boosted her immensely

Also, first timeline Madoka is weaker than Sayaka
 
The real cal howard said:
I'm against this. We don't give Composite Link something above 4-B even though the FD Mask buffed him from High 6-C to High 4-C.
Click to expand...
This thread isn't about giving Madoka something above 5-B, it's about giving them an "Unknown" before the rating to represent how unsure we are about the rating, and that it's a mere baseline.

Why would Composite Link even get it in that case? How is that analogous at all? One multiplier which may not stack with another power boost is different from 100 multipliers which we know stack.
 
Also the difference between High 6C and High 4C encompasses such an insanely small part of 4B and is only 1 multiplier its not even relevant to begin win.
 
The point was completely missed on what I was saying.

If we have a choice between unknown and not unknown, definitely go with the latter. Going any higher than planet level severely highballs a character who hasn't shown anything close until she becomes God with a capital G.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Unqver
Puella Magi Verse High 1-B Upgrade
11 12 13
Replies
490
Views
38K
Beast_Zero_Gudako
Beast_Zero_Gudako
SomebodyData
  • Locked
Revising the Puella Magi Top-Tiers to Unknown
Replies
23
Views
3K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Kuro4416
𝗖𝗥𝗧 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗞𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗠𝗮𝗱𝗼𝗸𝗮 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗣𝗠𝗠𝗠
Replies
12
Views
4K
Arzzz
Arzzz
StrymULTRA
Puella Magi - fixing AP and other stuff
2
Replies
64
Views
4K
StrymULTRA
StrymULTRA
StrymULTRA
  • Locked
Puella Magi verse: adding scans for God Tiers
2
Replies
76
Views
7K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Back
Top