- 4,523
- 2,242
"significantly" affect is not what transcend means. It literally means to be able to affect things on the level of aleph 2. Like, later on it says that layers into 1A start at aleph 3Those are the literal definition of transcend bruh.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"significantly" affect is not what transcend means. It literally means to be able to affect things on the level of aleph 2. Like, later on it says that layers into 1A start at aleph 3Those are the literal definition of transcend bruh.
He said with the Ultimate Ensemble. He didn't even address the Q and AThe other one staff doesn't agree on 1-A, he agreed on Low 1-A.
Even Elizhaa said that At lowest Yogiri is Low 1-A. And can reach 1-A with much context.
1-A transcend aleph-2, not being on it. That Low 1-A. And the fact that the FAQ are still being revised.
Also, where?
From the Tiering Systems page. 1-A is equivalent to aleph 2, Low 1-A is equivalent to aleph 1, High 1-B would be equivalent to aleph 01-A: Outerverse level
Characters or objects that can affect structures with a number of dimensions equal to the cardinal aleph-2
Preferably based on the discussion rules page there should be at least 2 staff who both agree on the same tiering, especially for tier 1 stuff like this.I am fine with it, one admin already agreed with 1-A and he is expertise in verse and tier 1. I can still wait for more input.
But generally, stop derailing with question type, we have dealt with it in the first page.
Semantic, yes that what i mean."significantly" affect is not what transcend means. It literally means to be able to affect things on the level of aleph 2. Like, later on it says that layers into 1A start at aleph 3
Transcending Ultimate ensemble will only make you 1 layer above it except with r>f.He said with the Ultimate Ensemble. He didn't even address the Q and A
You're saying that means they transcend aleph 2. That is the opposite of what it says there.Semantic, yes that what i mean.
The Ultimate Ensemble is Low 1A. He's saying that taking that along with everything else could get a good 1A, but High 1A or higher requires more context which doesn't really existTranscending Ultimate ensemble will only make you 1 layer above it except with r>f.
That mean you are superior to Aleph.You're saying that means they transcend aleph 2. That is the opposite of what it says there.
The context is r>f.The Ultimate Ensemble is Low 1A. He's saying that taking that along with everything else could get a good 1A, but High 1A or higher requires more context which doesn't really exist
No, it means you're on the same level.That mean you are superior to Aleph.
What?The context is r>f.
Oh come on.No, it means you're on the same level.
In order to reach 1-A, Yogiri should transcend UEG in R>F degrees.What
Affecting something does not mean you transcend it lol. Low 2C beings affect space-time continuums, they don't transcend them.Oh come on.
The argument is that he literally doesIn order to reach 1-A, Yogiri should transcend UEG in R>F degrees.
Right, obligatory action for this.The argument is that he literally does
Mitsuki R>Fs the world including UEGRight, obligatory action for this.
Scan please?
The Yogiri>Mitsuki scan?Mitsuki R>Fs the world including UEG
Yogiri's true form > him
I would have explained this whole ordeal better in another thread since this one was really rushed.
That scan is for Mitsuki > UEG, since its all a dream to him.The Yogiri>Mitsuki scan?
What did mitsuki dream of? The sea? Or the space beyond the sea?That scan is for Mitsuki > UEG, since its all a dream to him.
In V14 it is implied/explained that the relationship between Mitsuki and the world (including UEG) is the same between Yogiri's true form and the entire cosmology. But this Volume is untranslated for now.
And, as one would expect, Yogiri defeated Mitsuki already
Higher dimensional transcendences are qualitative, but that's not too relevant to your questionFollow up question: Exactly how would Dreaming bridge the gap between Low 1-A and 1-A ? I thought the gap between Azathoth-like relationships between dream and dreamer was higher-dimensional, not qualitatively above what they dreamed.
The difference between Low 1A and 1A is a lot smaller than High 1A to 1A. But that's a good point. However, I have to point at the FAQ again where it explains how a character can be 1A without a High 1B (or higher) cosmologyUm thank you for the correction Tarang, but the gap between 1-A & Low 1-A is like really big, I think conceptually above Low 1-As like High 1-As are conceptually above 1-As, from what I remember, which means nothing like the Higher-Dimensional or Mythos' Gates / Infinite Spiral like gaps would be enough for a Low 1-A to reach it.
Oh. Um, I'm aware that you can be 1-A w/o having a High 1-B Cosmology. I've seen it happpen a 1-2 times. I was just wondering if dreams like I aforementioned was enough to satisfy the requirement with how far you are > the dream of the cosmology by being it's dreamer or viewing it akin to a dream.The difference between Low 1A and 1A is a lot smaller than High 1A to 1A. But that's a good point. However, I have to point at the FAQ again where it explains how a character can be 1A without a High 1B (or higher) cosmology
Absolutely no problemThanks for derailment
Lazy, if you do me favour and count them, I will be happyWhy the votes haven't been updated?
Bruh, what a lazy girl.Lazy, if you do me favour and count them, I will be happy
1 agree 99 disagree including 10 staffLazy, if you do me favour and count them, I will be happy
That would mean the deletion of the thread, not just some mere halt.It’s as if yogiri used his instant death on this thread
No he killed the activity of the thread not deleting itThat would mean the deletion of the thread, not just some mere halt.
He doesn’t have to necessarily kill you, he could just kill your arm and it won’t work anymore.Whatever Yogiri kills, stays dead.
No need to, call staff members. People here are just derailingBumping this silent thread
so just close this thread if it slips a lot, plus you have no intention of this thread eitherNo need to, call staff members. People here are just derailing
? Damn I did not know you read my intentions. And no, if I wanted to close, I would request it's closure.so just close this thread if it slips a lot, plus you have no intention of this thread either
Yes, and that was my point earlier kekIf consider dimension as a subset of a universe so wouldn't HRE,UEG will become 1A (or low 1A idk) and making ultimate ensemble 1A+ or high 1A.
That a big if and a big stretch lol.If consider dimension as a subset of a universe so wouldn't HRE,UEG will become 1A (or low 1A idk) and making ultimate ensemble 1A+ or high 1A.