Rakih_Elyan
He/Him- 4,408
- 3,041
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Yogiri, 1-A possibly high 1-A
- Thread starter ImmortalDread
- Start date
- Status
- 97
- 6
It's HRE who is low 1A.
Rakih_Elyan
He/Him- 4,408
- 3,041
WHat is HRE? Holy Roman Empire?
- 5,341
- 6,084
heavenly record eater
Rakih_Elyan
He/Him- 4,408
- 3,041
Those are just 1-B lol.
- 12,447
- 5,641
are there any scans aside from an author statement of yogiri being 1-A?
- 3,346
- 1,911
I believe 1 staff approval, and 1 staff disapproval, the OP hasnt updated their count in forever though
- 18,393
- 14,323
- Thread starter
- #371
I am a bit busy currently, if anyone want to help me with staff vote tally, your welcome, but if you don't mind, link their posts as well.
- 3,346
- 1,911
- 9,982
- 10,821
I dunno what is being argued but;
the answer alone does line up with what question is and atleast that's what is given as by default assumption, I don't see that author "answered" a question without taking into account "what's question is". So that's pretty given.
About it being 1-A or L1-A, author has said that yogiri can ignore Dimensions as a property itself in a way that he can ignore even structures/space whose property is to not even have Dimensions, as per our FAQ, it's straight up 1-A, given that Dimensions as property doesn't matter to him and so take it to whatever amount is just unnecessary.
the answer alone does line up with what question is and atleast that's what is given as by default assumption, I don't see that author "answered" a question without taking into account "what's question is". So that's pretty given.
About it being 1-A or L1-A, author has said that yogiri can ignore Dimensions as a property itself in a way that he can ignore even structures/space whose property is to not even have Dimensions, as per our FAQ, it's straight up 1-A, given that Dimensions as property doesn't matter to him and so take it to whatever amount is just unnecessary.
Abstractly_a_Protagonist
He/Him- 1,675
- 1,428
Uh, no offense to Phoenks.
But I don't think FC/OC staff has the same degree of authority as VSBW staff regarding CRT.
Correct me if I'm wrong tho.
- 9,982
- 10,821
Uh.. yeah. They don't.
- 3,346
- 1,911
dont they have the vsbw tag? or is that given to all staff,regardless if they're in vsbw
Abstractly_a_Protagonist
He/Him- 1,675
- 1,428
- 3,346
- 1,911
never mind, i cant read, yea i guess no staff disagreements then
- 3,346
- 1,911
this thread needs 1 more agreement to pass since this a tier 1 thread i believe
- 3,693
- 2,061
I believe the problem is about what the context of "dimension" that author mean, if that higher dimension, then it definetly make yogiri 1A or low 1A
- 9,982
- 10,821
Dimensions being used as elements in Universe/space makes it pretty clear that it's axiomatic.
- 3,693
- 2,061
Well...... still not enough for say is a higher dimension
- 4,769
- 7,810
I said 1-A would be fine in the case that I got the context for the Ultimate Ensemble quote which I still never really got.
Also I'm like 99% sure calc mods don't count as mod votes so yeah it'd still be 1 approval 1 disapproval
Abstractly_a_Protagonist
He/Him- 1,675
- 1,428
So in the end.
Only Elizhaa vote is counted:
In case of misunderstanding.
@Phoenks is FC/OC staff and @AbaddonTheDisappointment is Calc member, their vote is not counted as Mod vote according to our rule.
Only Elizhaa vote is counted:
In case of misunderstanding.
@Phoenks is FC/OC staff and @AbaddonTheDisappointment is Calc member, their vote is not counted as Mod vote according to our rule.
- 167,855
- 76,474
@Ultima_Reality @Qawsedf234 @PrinceofPein @Everything12 @Planck69 @Ovy7 @TheUnshakableOne
What do you think about this?
PrinceofPein
Username Only- 9,073
- 5,999
To put it simply, it is a question directly asking the author "is Yogiri 1-A" and such leading questions are banned here and that is the basis for this upgrade
- 5,341
- 6,084
- 1,528
- 855
I don't understand how it works to just write the ultimate ensemble and just write the ultimate essemble without adding any other mathematical terms, not even math or commentary. throughout the piece, r>f talks about imaginary worlds and passes the ultimate for this world, but there is not even any mathematical space or mathematical universe hypothesis.
- 15,968
- 8,184
On the question's point, sites rules is about social media but the question was done on an official site so it doesn't even apply by technically to the wiki. Also, leading questions are yes or no answers. An elaborating response should be sufficient to prove the answer is a serious response.
- Do not pester or harass the authors of various works on social media about versus debating or character statistics. They are often bombarded by numerous questions from fans, and thus are rarely interested in giving a serious response. In addition, the statements they give to appease users are often contradictory to the feats in the stories of the works they have written. Thus, it is frowned upon to bother them over these topics.
- 15,968
- 8,184
@Planck69 @Celestial_Pegasus @Maverick_Zero_X @LephyrTheRevanchist what do you think about the thread?
I think my early response got helpful information.
I think my early response got helpful information.
Last edited:
- 10,343
- 11,894
Will be taking a look, thanks for the heads-up
- 10,343
- 11,894
I must preface this saying my knowledge of higher dimensions is not the best. However, this particular case is easier to understand for me since we do have precedent. As such, I have to agree with @Elizhaa breakdown.
Ovy7
He/Him- 2,622
- 2,474
I agree with Pein
- 18,393
- 14,323
- Thread starter
- #395
One more staff approval, and I will add the changes. Thanks for helping out.
@Abstractly_a_Protagonist I will give you my consent to make the changes once the thread is accepted and approved.
@Abstractly_a_Protagonist I will give you my consent to make the changes once the thread is accepted and approved.
Ovy7
He/Him- 2,622
- 2,474
As for the Tegmark Multiverse, is this the only piece of evidence?
Because IMO it's not anywhere close to enough proof to validate a higher tier, it's just a vague mention of a concept.
Edit: I don't see why The Downstreamers are use as an example here. Anyone can go and read the scans on the profiles - the scans are extremely specific, to the point of breaking down that reality is math and the Ultimate Manifold are all possible universes based on mathematics.
Meanwhile, the above quote just namedrops Ultimate Assemble without any context or explanations of what it means in-universe.
Because IMO it's not anywhere close to enough proof to validate a higher tier, it's just a vague mention of a concept.
Edit: I don't see why The Downstreamers are use as an example here. Anyone can go and read the scans on the profiles - the scans are extremely specific, to the point of breaking down that reality is math and the Ultimate Manifold are all possible universes based on mathematics.
Meanwhile, the above quote just namedrops Ultimate Assemble without any context or explanations of what it means in-universe.
Last edited:
- 15,968
- 8,184
Additional contexts exist, like in my first reply about the gods. The ultimate set was mentioned and elaborated upon, but we got confirmation that it exists with clear raws.
「僕らの一派にはさ、こう考える者もいる。とりあえず宇宙を含む上位宇宙を含む……みたいな究極的な集合があったとしてさ。それが滅びないのはなぜなんだろう、と。時空が無限に存在しているのなら、いずれはそんな存在があらわれても不思議じゃないし、そんな存在が気まぐれに全ての宇宙を滅ぼす可能性はゼロじゃない。そして可能性がゼロでないのなら、無限の時間があればそれは必ず発生しそうなものだよね。けどそうはならない。僕たちが観測できた範囲内でのことなんだけど、一定以上に強くなろうとした、なった神はいずれ消えてしまうんだ。では、それを成している者がいるんじゃないか？ この宇宙には何かの限界が、基準があるんじゃないかとね」
The imgur translation link in my previous post has the info though it should be more explicit in using the ultimate set text; the ultimate set of world was asked and the Q&A and from the author's answer which is to read the novel for info it is the ultimate ensemble.
Last edited:
Ovy7
He/Him- 2,622
- 2,474
Yeah, sorry, but I legit do not see it. Just mentioning "Ultimate Ensemble" or "Ultimate Set" and just leaving at that without MUCH more explanation, something none of those scans is doing, does not cut it in my book.
As previously mentioned, Downstreamers is explaining what it means, down to using mathematics and examples (prime numbers), while these scans here are just name drops.
As previously mentioned, Downstreamers is explaining what it means, down to using mathematics and examples (prime numbers), while these scans here are just name drops.
- 8,215
- 1,939
I'm pretty sure this is the reason why it's being used in conjunction with the infinite dimensions QnA, which is supposed to be the supporting evidence.
- Status
Similar threads
